03.12.2012 Views

Sartre's second century

Sartre's second century

Sartre's second century

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

118 Chapter Eight<br />

Despite these limitations, it is worthwhile in overall terms to<br />

emphasise the positive value of <strong>Sartre's</strong> work in understanding and<br />

navigating our contemporary postmodern situation. Like postmodernists<br />

such as Foucault, Deleuze, Derrida, Guattari, Lyotard and Baudrillard,<br />

Sartre offers a trenchant critique of the condition of modernity and a deep,<br />

searching scepticism towards the project of the Enlightenment. More<br />

importantly, however, his work acts as a kind of critical searchlight that<br />

shines through the cracks and exposes the fragile foundations of both<br />

modern and postmodern excesses. Thus, there are clearly aspects of<br />

postmodernism that are anathema to <strong>Sartre's</strong> theoretical sensibilities.<br />

Beneath the elements of change and evolution in his philosophical<br />

outlook, there is a deep and consistent attachment to the idea of human<br />

freedom and of transforming the world to bring this about. In the 1960s,<br />

this brought Sartre into conflict with (post)structuralists like Foucault,<br />

Derrida and Althusser who were intent at the time on consigning the figure<br />

of "Man" to the dustbin of history. In the late 1960s and the 1970s,<br />

Foucault and others severed their links with structuralism and moved on to<br />

the (Sartrean) project of resurrecting the subject and articulating a vision<br />

of freedom, relinquishing their hostility and adopting a more positive<br />

attitude towards the value of <strong>Sartre's</strong> work. In an interview in 1968 for<br />

instance, Foucault pays homage to <strong>Sartre's</strong> contribution to intellectual<br />

thought in France and views his own work as "minor" in relation to the<br />

"immensity" of <strong>Sartre's</strong>:<br />

I think the immense work and political action of Sartre defines an era. [...]<br />

I would never accept a comparison—even for the sake of a contrast—of<br />

the minor work of historical and methodological spadework that I do with<br />

a body of work like his. 39<br />

In an article devoted to Sartre, entitled "II a 6t6 mon maitre",<br />

published in a special 1964 issue of the periodical, Arts, Deleuze also<br />

expresses his admiration for "the private thinker [who] introduced new<br />

themes, a new style, a new polemic and a new way of raising problems as<br />

well as a hatred for all modes of 'representation'". 40 He reiterates this<br />

tribute in a series of interviews with Claire Parnet, published as Dialogues<br />

in 1977, where he speaks enthusiastically of his respect for Sartre:<br />

Foucault, in La Quinzaine litteraire, no. 46 (1968), 20, cited in Poster, Foucault,<br />

Marxism and History, 5.<br />

40 Deleuze, "II a 6l€ mon maitre", 1208-09 (my translation).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!