100 CHAPTER 5: Probing AGB nucleosyn<strong>thesis</strong> via accurate Planetary Nebula abundancesthe dredged-up material mainly consists of helium and nitrogen produced by the CNO cycle.Consequently, this result should imply a lower syn<strong>thesis</strong> of primary carbon in the convectiveinter-shell, hence a lower carbon abundance in the dredged-up material compared to the standardvalues (X csh ( 12 C) < 0.2 − 0.3). This indication agrees with our suggestion to explainthe measured CNO abundances in PNe with very high helium content.A few years later, Frost et al. (1998) partly confirmed the results by Vassiliadis & Wood(1993), and pushed the analysis further reporting the discovery of a new kind of thermalpulses, designated as “degenerate thermal pulses” (the reader should refer to that work for alldetails). In few words a massive TP-AGB star would experience a sort of cyclic trend: Firsta relatively large number of weak thermal pulses (say 30 − 40) with very deep dredge-uptakes place leaving a long tail of unburned helium, that is then burned at once by a strong“degenerate pulse” (the carbon abundance in the inter-shell reaches 12 C ≈ 0.6), after whichanother sequence of weak pulses starts again, and so on. Similar trends have been reportedby Siess et al. (2002) in their study of the TP-AGB evolution in population III stars.It should be remarked that while there is a close agreement in the results by Frost etal. (1998) and Vassiliadis & Wood (1993) with respect to the high efficiency of the thirddredge-up (λ ≈ 1) in these massive AGB stars, some substantial differences could be presentinstead in the predicted chemical composition of the dredged-up material. In fact, thepossibility of a carbon abundance lower than the standard value (X csh ( 12 C) < 0.2 − 0.3),which is deduced from the Vassiliadis & Wood’s paper, is actually not confirmed by the workof Frost et al. (1998; also Lattanzio’s private communication). <strong>The</strong>se possible differencescould be ascribed to different physical and numerical details of the stellar evolution codes,that can significantly affect the results (see Frost et al. 1998; Frost & Lattanzio 1996; andLattanzio’s private communication).We believe that this point is crucial and it deserves a clarification with the aid of full calculationsof the thermal pulses experienced by the most massive AGB models. Anyway, asour study represents a sort of empirical calibration of the AGB nucleosyn<strong>thesis</strong>, we followVassiliadis & Wood’s indications and assume the possibility that during their TP-AGB evolutionthe most massive intermediate-mass stars suffer many deep dredge-up events that bringa large amount of helium, but little carbon up to the surface. In fact, as mentioned above,this seems just what we need to reproduce the observed abundances of the most He-rich PNe,thus solving a long-standing problem already stated by Becker & Iben (1980).<strong>The</strong> quantitative confirmation comes from the results of our TP-AGB calculations presentedin Fig. 5.10, referring to models with i) stellar masses in the range 4.5 − 5.0 M ⊙ , ii)initial LMC composition (Z = 0.008), iii) assumed very deep dredge-up (λ ∼ 0.9), and iv)inter-shell chemical composition with typically (X csh ( 12 C) = 0.02 − 0.03, X csh ( 16 O) =0.002 − 0.003, X csh ( 4 He) = 0.967 − 0.978). <strong>The</strong>se models experience also HBB (moreefficient at larger masses) as we see by considering the mirror-like evolution of the C- andN-curves in the top-left and top-right panels, respectively. <strong>The</strong> final points, which would correspondto the predicted PN abundances, are clearly in very good agreement with the observeddata for the most He-rich PNe. In particular, models are able to reach He/H∼ 0.17 − 0.20,without over-producing nitrogen, and accounting for the extent of carbon depletion. We notethat the rising part of the C-curves towards the end of the evolution, and the concomitant flatteningof the N-curves reflect the eventual extinction of HBB while the last dredge-up events
5.6. Comparison between models and observations 101still take place.Constraints from neon abundancesWithin the lowest extension of the error-bars, the data for the most He-rich PNe do not showa significant overabundance with respect to solar, though some increasing trend of Ne/H withHe/H might be present. Some useful indications can be derived.Recalling that both the first and second dredge-up episodes are expected not to alterthe initial neon abundance, and looking at Fig. 5.5 we point out two facts, namely: i) thepredicted Ne/H after the second dredge-up in the most massive stars (with M ∼ 4 − 5 M ⊙ )with initial solar composition are already compatible with the measured Ne/H in the mostHe-rich PNe, whereas the models of the same stellar mass but with LMC compositionlie clearly below the observed points; ii) the slightly increasing trend of Ne/H with He/Hat increasing stellar mass merely reflect the decrease in the surface H content due to thedredge-up events, since the neon abundance is completely unaffected.<strong>The</strong> consideration of these two points, together with the conclusions from the analysiscarried out in the preceding sections, would point to a significant Ne production havingoccurred in the progenitor stars of the most He-rich PNe, since all other PN abundances(He, C, N, and O) seem globally consistent with stars originating from gas of sub-solarmetallicity. As shown, our intermediate-mass models with LMC composition do satisfy allthese chemical constraints.Of course, another possibility would be (Ne/Z) LMC > (Ne/Z) ⊙ , that is the initialcontent of Ne in the original metal-poor gas was enhanced compared to what is expected fora solar-metallicity-scaled mixture. In this case, there is no necessity that Ne is syn<strong>thesis</strong>edduring the AGB phase.Going back to the former alternative, which invokes a sizeable Ne production inintermediate-mass stars with LMC composition, we find that models are able to attain a goodagreement with the Ne/H values measured in the most He-rich PNe by assuming that theenrichment of neon is due to the syn<strong>thesis</strong> of 22 Ne during thermal pulses via the chain of reactions14 N(α, γ) 18 F(β + , ν) 18 O(α, γ) 22 Ne. In other words, all nitrogen in the inter-shellshould be converted into 22 Ne (see Sect. 5.5.1). <strong>The</strong> possible channel of subsequent destructionthrough 22 Ne(α, n) 25 Mg should be inefficient. In our calculations we assume that just1% of the newly syn<strong>thesis</strong>ed 22 Ne is burned into 25 Mg (see also Sect. 5.5.1).<strong>The</strong>n, in the context of the proposed interpretation, the immediate consequence wouldbe the inefficiency of the 22 Ne(α, n) 25 Mg reaction as production channel of neutrons, withimportant implications for the syn<strong>thesis</strong> of slow-neutron capture elements (Busso et al. 1999).In this case, the major role for the s-process nucleosyn<strong>thesis</strong> would be played by the 13 C(α,n) 16 O channel.If solar initial metallicity was assumed for these PNe with high helium abundance then,similarly to Sect. 5.6.3, no neon production is needed since the observed values are compatible,within uncertainties, to the solar value.
- Page 1 and 2:
RIJKSUNIVERSITEIT GRONINGENPhysics
- Page 3 and 4:
To my parents
- Page 5 and 6:
Contents1 Introduction 11.1 Evoluti
- Page 7 and 8:
CONTENTSvii5 Probing AGB nucleosynt
- Page 9 and 10:
1IntroductionPLANETARY NEBULAE are
- Page 11 and 12:
1.1. Evolution of low and intermedi
- Page 13 and 14:
1.2. Planetary Nebulae 5Flash−Dri
- Page 15 and 16:
1.3. Physics in PNe 7their whole li
- Page 17 and 18:
1.3. Physics in PNe 95.35 eVO IIIλ
- Page 19 and 20:
1.4. Studying PNe in the infrared 1
- Page 21 and 22:
2The ISO-SWS Spectrum ofPlanetary N
- Page 23 and 24:
2.3. Data reduction 15Table 2.1-. C
- Page 25 and 26:
2.4. Line flux discussion 17Table 2
- Page 27 and 28:
2.5. The visual and the ultraviolet
- Page 29:
2.6. Analysis 21Table 2.5-. Electro
- Page 32 and 33:
24 CHAPTER 2: The ISO-SWS Spectrum
- Page 34 and 35:
26 CHAPTER 2: The ISO-SWS Spectrum
- Page 36 and 37:
28 CHAPTER 2: The ISO-SWS Spectrum
- Page 39 and 40:
3An ISO and IUE study of PlanetaryN
- Page 41 and 42:
3.3. Corrections to line fluxes 33[
- Page 43 and 44:
3.4. Line fluxes 35Table 3.1-. Comp
- Page 45 and 46:
Table 3.3-. IUE intensities, fluxes
- Page 47 and 48:
3.5. Physical parameters 393.4.3 Op
- Page 49 and 50:
3.5. Physical parameters 41Table 3.
- Page 51 and 52:
3.6. Chemical abundances 43Table 3.
- Page 53 and 54:
3.6. Chemical abundances 45Table 3.
- Page 55:
3.7. Conclusions 47Acknowledgements
- Page 58 and 59: 50 CHAPTER 4: Abundances of Planeta
- Page 60 and 61: 52 CHAPTER 4: Abundances of Planeta
- Page 62 and 63: 54 CHAPTER 4: Abundances of Planeta
- Page 64 and 65: 56 CHAPTER 4: Abundances of Planeta
- Page 66 and 67: 58 CHAPTER 4: Abundances of Planeta
- Page 68 and 69: 60 CHAPTER 4: Abundances of Planeta
- Page 70 and 71: 62 CHAPTER 4: Abundances of Planeta
- Page 72 and 73: 64 CHAPTER 4: Abundances of Planeta
- Page 74 and 75: 66 CHAPTER 4: Abundances of Planeta
- Page 77 and 78: 5Probing AGB nucleosynthesis viaacc
- Page 79 and 80: 5.1. Introduction 71about the synth
- Page 81 and 82: Table 5.2-. Radius, Zanstra tempera
- Page 83 and 84: 5.3. Accurate abundances of ISO-obs
- Page 85 and 86: 5.3. Accurate abundances of ISO-obs
- Page 87 and 88: 5.4. Nucleosynthesis in low- and in
- Page 89 and 90: 5.5. Synthetic TP-AGB calculations
- Page 91 and 92: 5.6. Comparison between models and
- Page 93 and 94: 5.6. Comparison between models and
- Page 95 and 96: 5.6. Comparison between models and
- Page 97 and 98: 5.6. Comparison between models and
- Page 99 and 100: 5.6. Comparison between models and
- Page 101 and 102: 5.6. Comparison between models and
- Page 103 and 104: 5.6. Comparison between models and
- Page 105 and 106: 5.6. Comparison between models and
- Page 107: 5.6. Comparison between models and
- Page 111 and 112: 5.7. Summary and conclusions 103Fig
- Page 113 and 114: 5.7. Summary and conclusions 105A s
- Page 115 and 116: 6Physical Conditions in PDRs around
- Page 117 and 118: 6.2. Observations 109are not promin
- Page 119 and 120: 6.4. General parameters of the PNe
- Page 121 and 122: 6.4. General parameters of the PNe
- Page 123 and 124: Table 6.3-. Radius, Zanstra tempera
- Page 125 and 126: 6.6. Lines fluxes 117Figure 6.2-. S
- Page 127 and 128: 6.7. Physical conditions of the PDR
- Page 129 and 130: 6.7. Physical conditions of the PDR
- Page 131 and 132: 6.7. Physical conditions of the PDR
- Page 133 and 134: 6.7. Physical conditions of the PDR
- Page 135 and 136: 6.8. PDRs versus Shocks 127Figure 6
- Page 137 and 138: 6.10. Atomic, ionized and molecular
- Page 139 and 140: 6.10. Atomic, ionized and molecular
- Page 141 and 142: 6.11. General discussion 133Table 6
- Page 143 and 144: 6.11. General discussion 135Figure
- Page 145 and 146: 6.12. Summary and Conclusions 137su
- Page 147 and 148: 7Conclusions and future workTHE res
- Page 149 and 150: 141• PNe with He/H > 0.14. The st
- Page 151 and 152: 143HERSCHEL The launch of this sate
- Page 153 and 154: Nederlandse SamenvattingSTERREN wor
- Page 155 and 156: Nederlandse Samenvatting 147Figuur
- Page 157 and 158: Nederlandse Samenvatting 149PHOTOIO
- Page 159 and 160:
Nederlandse Samenvatting 151Figuur
- Page 161 and 162:
Nederlandse Samenvatting 153infraro
- Page 163 and 164:
English SummarySTARS are born, live
- Page 165 and 166:
English Summary 157Figure 2-. Two e
- Page 167 and 168:
English Summary 159PHOTOIONIZATIONR
- Page 169 and 170:
English Summary 161Figure 5-. Spect
- Page 171 and 172:
English Summary 163all) stages of i
- Page 173 and 174:
BibliographyAcker A., Marcout J., O
- Page 175 and 176:
BIBLIOGRAPHY 167Henry R.B.C., Kwitt
- Page 177 and 178:
BIBLIOGRAPHY 169Pottasch S.R., Bern
- Page 179 and 180:
List of PublicationsPublications in
- Page 181 and 182:
AcknowledgementsI could easily writ
- Page 183:
Acknowledgements 175sense of humor,