13.07.2015 Views

thesis - IRS, The Infrared Spectrograph

thesis - IRS, The Infrared Spectrograph

thesis - IRS, The Infrared Spectrograph

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.5. Synthetic TP-AGB calculations 81We briefly recall that the initial conditions at the first thermal pulse are extracted fromfull stellar models with convective overshooting by Girardi et al. (2000). <strong>The</strong> consideredmass interval (0.7 − 5.0 M ⊙ ) covers the whole class of low- and intermediate-mass stars thatdevelop an electron-degenerate C-O core at the end of the core He-burning phase. In thesemodels the initial chemical composition is taken from Anders & Grevesse (1989) for solarmetallicity (Z = 0.019), while for other metallicities solar-scaled abundances are assumed.<strong>The</strong> Girardi et al. (2000) models predict the changes (if any) in the surface chemicalcomposition occurring prior to the TP-AGB phase by the first dredge-up during the firstsettling on the Red Giant Branch, and by the second dredge-up in stars of intermediate mass(say M > 3.5 − 4 M ⊙ ) during the Early AGB phase.<strong>The</strong> subsequent TP-AGB evolution is calculated from the first thermal pulse up to thecomplete ejection of the envelope by stellar winds. Mass loss is included according to theVassiliadis & Wood’s (1993) formalism. <strong>The</strong> TP-AGB model predicts the changes in thesurface chemical composition caused by the third dredge-up and HBB. <strong>The</strong> third dredge-upis parametrized as a function of the efficiency, λ, and the minimum temperature at the baseof the convective envelope, Tbdred , required for dredge-up to occur (Marigo et al. 1999, seealso Sect. 5.5.1). <strong>The</strong> process of HBB – expected to take place in the most massive andluminous AGB stars ( 4.5M ⊙ depending on metallicity) – is followed in detail with theaid of a complete envelope model including the main nuclear reactions of the CNO cycle(Marigo et al. 1998; Marigo 1998).Recently Marigo (2002) has introduced a major novelty in the TP-AGB model, thatis the replacement of fixed solar-scaled molecular opacities – commonly adopted inmost AGB evolution codes (k fix ) – with variable molecular opacities (k var ) which areconsistently coupled with the actual elemental abundances of the outer stellar layers. <strong>The</strong>impact of this new prescription on the evolution of AGB stars is significant and consequently,as will be shown below, it importantly affects the predictions of the PN elemental abundances.For the sake of clarity, in the following we will provide an outline of the main inputassumptions adopted in our TP-AGB calculations (Sect. 5.5.1 and Table 5.4).5.5.1 Nucleosyn<strong>thesis</strong> and mixing assumptions of the TP-AGB model<strong>The</strong> treatment of the third dredge-up in the TP-AGB model is characterized by:• A temperature criterion to establish whether a dredge-up episode does or does not occur.It is based on the parameter Tbdred , that corresponds to the minimum temperature– at the base of the convective envelope at the stage of post-flash luminosity maximum– required for dredge-up to take place. In practice a procedure, based on envelope integrations,allows one to determine the onset of the third dredge-up, that is the minimumcore mass Mcmin , and luminosity at the first mixing episode. More details can be foundin Marigo et al. (1999; see also Wood 1981, Boothroyd & Sackmann 1988, Karakas etal. 2002).• <strong>The</strong> efficiency λ = ∆M dred /∆M c . It is defined as the fraction of the core massincrement, ∆M c , over a quiescent inter-pulse period, that is dredged-up to the surfaceat the next thermal pulse (corresponding to a mass ∆M dred ).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!