13.07.2015 Views

Journal of European Integration History – Revue d'histoire de l'

Journal of European Integration History – Revue d'histoire de l'

Journal of European Integration History – Revue d'histoire de l'

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

28Wolfram KaiserSixes and Sevens in 1959 with their proposal to counteract the pending creation <strong>of</strong>EFTA with a special <strong>of</strong>fer for EEC association to induce the Danes to abandon theirprospective EFTA partners. 83IIIUntil the expert talks between British and German, French and Italian <strong>of</strong>ficials duringthe winter and spring <strong>of</strong> 1960-1, the EFTA states were still in principle aimingat the original FTA plan <strong>–</strong> with possible modifications. However, their applications<strong>of</strong> 1961-2 for full EEC membership or EEC association respectively indicated thatthey were now prepared to accept to a greater extent than hitherto the new realitiesbrought about by the creation <strong>of</strong> the EEC and to make substantial compromises inor<strong>de</strong>r to safeguard their economic and political interests. This in turn forced theEEC states to clarify their attitu<strong>de</strong>s to a number <strong>of</strong> key issues <strong>of</strong> future <strong>European</strong>integration, in particular regarding the future role <strong>of</strong> the neutrals in the integrationprocess and <strong>–</strong> related to this <strong>–</strong> the association <strong>of</strong> third countries and, most importantly,the question <strong>of</strong> whether and un<strong>de</strong>r what conditions they would agree to theEEC's enlargement.The integration <strong>de</strong>bate among the Six during 1961-3 reveals that they not onlydid not give priority to possible arrangements with the neutrals. There was alsoconsi<strong>de</strong>rable hostility to neutrality, which seemed incompatible with what the Sixwere building <strong>–</strong> namely, a community <strong>of</strong> states with shared values and interests.Particularly at a time when they were still contemplating increased cooperation inforeign policy and, ultimately, in <strong>de</strong>fence matters, the Six were not keen on EECmembership <strong>of</strong> neutrals. The German Chancellery and the Auswärtiges Amt, forexample, agreed that <strong>–</strong> in the words <strong>of</strong> the State Secretary Rolf Lahr, who in principlestrongly supported enlargement <strong>–</strong> it should not be the aim <strong>of</strong> the EEC“möglichst viele Vollmitglie<strong>de</strong>r zu erwerben, son<strong>de</strong>rn eine manövrierfähige Größe,von <strong>de</strong>m Westen beson<strong>de</strong>rs verpflichteter Staaten zu bleiben”. 84 Just how hostilesome among the Six were, especially to the two wealthy neutrals Switzerland andSwe<strong>de</strong>n, became obvious when Couve <strong>de</strong> Murville discussed their associationapplications with the three neutral EFTA states' ambassadors to France in Paris inFebruary 1962. According to a report by the British negotiator, Eric Roll, theFrench Foreign Minister <strong>de</strong>clared“that Swiss neutrality had its reason and basis in Franco-German conflict. The Communityhad put an end to this, and so to the foundation for Swiss neutrality. TheSwiss would surely come to recognise this. With the Swe<strong>de</strong>s, he had taken the linethat it had been a historical acci<strong>de</strong>nt that the Swe<strong>de</strong>s had not been involved in thetwo world wars. But this was no reason for them to raise neutrality into a principle.”83. “Sieben und EWG”, Hartlieb to Carstens: PA AA/353/Ref. 200-I A2 (18 June 1959), AufzeichnungEmmel, “Beamtenbesprechung Kleine FHZ”: PA AA/353/Ref. 200-I A2 (23 June 1959).84. Aufzeichnung Lahr “Beitritt Irlands zur EWG”: PA AA/289/BStS (22 September 1961).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!