Data on Police Organisations in India - Commonwealth Human ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

CHAPTER 9DEPARTMENTAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST POLICEMEN& CRIME IN INDIAState/UT Wise <strong>Data</strong> on:• Departmental Proceedings againstPolicemen• Incidence & Rate of Cognizable Crimesunder:- IPC (Indian Penal Code)- SLL (Special and Local Laws)• Disposal of Cases by Courts under:- IPC (Indian Penal Code)- SLL (Special and Local Laws)• No. of Exhibits awaiting examination in:- State & Regional FSLsThis chapter attempts to provide youwith State/UT wise data on DepartmentalProceedings against Police personnel, Incidence& Rate of cognizable crimes under ‘IndianPenal Code (IPC)’ and under the ‘Special &Local Laws (SLL)’, Disposal of under trial casesby the Subordinate Courts under IPC & SLLand number of Exhibits awaiting examinationin State & Regional FSLs.Departmental Proceedings AgainstPolicemenA total of 65,383 cases of departmentalproceedings, including those brought forwardfrom previous year against Police personnelwere processed during 2010. Of these cases,40,082 were initiated and subsequentlydisposed off, amounting to 61.5% disposalof the total proceedings while 25,301proceedings remained pending for disposal ason 01.01.2011.At the state level the highest numberof 12,114 departmental proceedings wereinitiated and disposed of in Uttar Pradeshduring the year 2010, followed by 4,327 inTamil Nadu and 3,797 in Rajasthan. The Stateswhich have reported relatively higher numberof proceedings pending as on 1.1.2011 wereUttar Pradesh (2,631), Andhra Pradesh (2,571)and Tamil Nadu (2,147). Details are given inTable – 9.1. (Page No. 111)Cognizable Crime / Incidence & Rate ofCrime (IPC)Cognizable Crime is defined as one inwhich a Police Officer may arrest an accusedwithout warrant. The police have a directresponsibility to take immediate action onreceipt of a complaint in such crimes by takingsteps like visit to the scene of the crime,investigate the facts, apprehend the offenderand produce him before a court of law havingjurisdiction over the matter.CRIME IN INDIAA total of 22,24,831 IPC crimes werereported in the country during the year 2010as against 21,21,345 in 2009, showing anincrease of 4.9 percent in 2010. At state levelMadhya Pradesh accounted for the maximumof 2,14,269 (9.6%) of total cognizable crimesregistered in the country followed by 2,08,168(9.4%) in Maharashtra and 1,85,678 (8.3%)in Tamil Nadu. . This can be explained partlydue to increase in actual crime and partly dueto improved registration of crime. Details aregiven in Table – 9.2. (Page No. 112)Cognizable Crimes (IPC)Year Incidence Rate ofCrime2009 21,21,345 181.42010 22,24,831 187.6%change 4.9% (+)3.6%over previous yearThe crime rate is defined as the ‘number ofCrimes’ per 1,00,000 (one hundred thousand)of population. It is universally taken as a reliable108
CHAPTER 9indicator since it balances the effect of growthin population.The crime rate in respect of IPC crimeshas Increased by 6.2 percent from 181.4 in2009 to 187.6 in 2010 at All India level. Kerala(424.1), Puducherry (352.3) and Chandigarh(299.8) have reported much higher crime ratesas compared to the national average of 187.6.Once again, the improved registration andactual increase in crime could possibly explainthis phenomenon in these States.Incidence & rate of crimes under Specialand Local Laws (SLL)In general, free reporting of crimesindicates better policing efforts. TheActs covering special subjects which areapplicable in the whole country or the Actsin force in specified territories, say a singlestate or part thereof, are considered for thepurpose of crime reported under Special& Local Laws (SLL). Local Acts are clubbedtogether in ‘Other SLL’ crimes due to theirdisparity from one place to other.A total of 45,25,917 SLL crimes werereported in the country during 2010accounting for a marginal decreased of0.61 percent over the previous year 2009(45,53,872). At state level Uttar Pradeshaccounted for the maximum of 21,13,620(46.7%) out of total SLL crimes in thecountry, followed by 6,28,558 (13.9%) inAndhra Pradesh and 5,15,788 (11.4%) inTamil Nadu. Details are given in Table – 9.3(Page No. 115)The rate of crime in respect of SLL hasshown decreased from 389.4 in 2009 to381.7 in 2010 showing decreased of 2.0% atnational level. In comparison to the nationalaverage of 381.7 the State of Uttarakhand(1631.8) Uttar Pradesh (1062.0) and theUT of A & N Island (2025.5) have reportedmuch higher SLL crime rates during 2010.Disposal of cases under Indian PenalCode (IPC) by courtsDuring 2010, there were a total of85,49,655 cases for trial (including pendingcases from the previous year) in the SubordinateCourts as compared to 81,30,053 during year2009 showing an increase of 5.2 percent overthe previous year.The percentage of cases coming up for trialout of the total under- trial cases was slightlyhigher 13.3 percent in 2010 than 12.6 percentin 2009 as shown in table below.Disposal IPC crime cases by courtsYear Cases of trial No. of cases PercentageIncluding Trial Convicted Trial Convictedpending2009 81,30,053 10,25,7814,27,655 12.6 41.72010 85,49,655 6,73,903 4,64,128 13.3 40.7At the end of the year 2010, 84.9% of IPCcases remained pending for trial in variousCriminal Courts of the country. Details aregiven in Table 9.4 (page No. 118)This signifies the enormity of pendency ofunder trial criminal cases in various subordinatescourts in the country. There are various factorsresponsible for this unusually high pendencyof under trial cases in the subordinate courts.It calls for total overhauling of the CriminalJustice System itself in order to provide justiceto the accused and victims promptly and at areasonable cost.The North-Eastern States, in general hadhigher pendency of under-trial cases. Thehighest pendency was reported by Lakshadweep(100.0%), Manipur (98.0%), and A N Island(97.3%) as compared to the total pendency anddisposal achieved during the year.The conviction rate is the percentage ofcases convicted to total cases trial and disposed109
Page 1 and 2:
£ÉÉ®iÉ àÉå {ÉÖÉÊãÉº
Page 7:
OFFICERS & OFFICIAL ASSICIATED WITH
Page 10 and 11:
CONTENTSTable No. Description Page
Page 12 and 13:
CONTENTSTable No. Description Page
Page 14 and 15:
AT A GLANCE(As on 01.01.2011)Chapte
Page 16 and 17:
AT A GLANCE(As on 01.01.2011)= Allo
Page 18 and 19:
AT A GLANCE(As on 01.01.2011)Chapte
Page 20 and 21:
CHAPTER 1Graph for Table AMobilityM
Page 22 and 23:
CHAPTER 1Table-A: National Basic Po
Page 24 and 25:
CHAPTER 1TABLE 1.1 -- (Continued .
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
CHAPTER 112TABLE 1.1 -- (Continued
Page 32 and 33:
CHAPTER 114TABLE 1.2 -- AREA AND PR
Page 34 and 35:
CHAPTER 11,2391,135874867847768721P
Page 36 and 37:
CHAPTER 13.30 (minimum) vehicles av
Page 38 and 39:
CHAPTER 2Police Stations for Specia
Page 40 and 41:
CHAPTER 2TABLE 2.2-- NUMBER OF SANC
Page 42 and 43:
CHAPTER 2TABLE 2.4 --NUMBER OF SPEC
Page 44 and 45:
CHAPTER 2TABLE 2.5 -- NUMBER OF ARM
Page 46 and 47:
CHAPTER 2Sl.No.States / UtsNumberof
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
CHAPTER 2TABLE 2.7 -- CITIES WITH P
Page 56 and 57:
CHAPTER 3State-wise details are giv
Page 58 and 59:
CHAPTER 3TABLE 3.1-- SANCTIONED AND
Page 60 and 61:
CHAPTER 342TABLE 3.3 -- SANCTIONED
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
CHAPTER 3TABLE 3.4 -- OFFICERS TO C
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
CHAPTER 3TABLE 3.5 -- (Continued ..
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
CHAPTER 356TABLE 3.8 -- ACTUAL STRE
Page 76 and 77: CHAPTER 3Sl.No.58TABLE 3.9 -- (Cont
Page 78 and 79: CHAPTER 3Sl.No.60TABLE 3.9 -- (Cont
Page 80 and 81: CHAPTER 3Sl.No.TABLE 3.10-- (Contin
Page 82 and 83: CHAPTER 3Sl.No.TABLE 3.10 -- (Conti
Page 88 and 89: CHAPTER 3TABLE 3.13 -- SANCTIONED S
Page 90 and 91: CHAPTER 3TABLE 3.15 -- SANCTIONED A
Page 92 and 93: CHAPTER 3Sl.No.Name of the CentralP
Page 94 and 95: CHAPTER 3TABLE 3.15 -- (Continued .
Page 96 and 97: CHAPTER 4SCs/STs & OBCs IN STATES P
Page 98 and 99: CHAPTER 4TABLE 4.1 -- REPRESENTATIO
Page 100 and 101: CHAPTER 4TABLE 4.3 -- REPRESENTATIO
Page 102 and 103: CHAPTER 5Expenditure of States/UTs
Page 104 and 105: CHAPTER 5The percentage satisfactio
Page 106 and 107: CHAPTER 5TABLE 5.2 -- EXPENDITURE O
Page 108 and 109: CHAPTER 5TABLE 5.4 -- AMOUNT OF MOD
Page 110 and 111: CHAPTER 6POLICE HOUSINGState wise <
Page 112 and 113: CHAPTER 6Sl.No.94TABLE 6.1 -- STATE
Page 114 and 115: CHAPTER 6TABLE 6.3 -- STATE/UT-WISE
Page 116 and 117: CHAPTER 7POLICE COMMUNICATIONSState
Page 118 and 119: CHAPTER 7TABLE 7.2 -- STATE/UT-WISE
Page 120 and 121: CHAPTER 8POLICE RECRUITMENT AND TRA
Page 122 and 123: CHAPTER 8Sl.No.104TABLE 8.1 -- STAT
Page 124 and 125: CHAPTER 8Sl.No.TABLE 8.3 -- NUMBER
Page 128 and 129: CHAPTER 9off. In 2010, conviction r
Page 130 and 131: CHAPTER 9Table 9.2 -- STATE/UT-WISE
Page 132 and 133: CHAPTER 911 4
Page 134 and 135: CHAPTER 911 6
Page 136 and 137: CHAPTER 9Sl.No.TABLE 9.4 -- STATE/U
Page 138 and 139: CHAPTER 9TABLE 9.6 -- NUMBER OF EXH
Page 140 and 141: CHAPTER 10Agitations are collective
Page 142 and 143: CHAPTER 10TABLE 10.2-- TOTAL NUMBER
Page 144 and 145: CHAPTER 10Sl.No.126Type of Agitatio
Page 146 and 147: CHAPTER 10Sl.No.128Type of Agitatio
Page 148 and 149: CHAPTER 10Sl.No.Type of AgitationTo
Page 150 and 151: CHAPTER 10Sl.No.Type of AgitationTo
Page 152 and 153: CHAPTER 11OTHER INFORMATIONS OF INT
Page 154 and 155: CHAPTER 11period as shown in the gr
Page 156 and 157: CHAPTER 11138TABLE 11.2 -- STATE/UT
Page 158 and 159: CHAPTER 11TABLE 11.4 -- STATE/UT-WI
Page 160 and 161: CHAPTER 11142TABLE 11.6 -- STATE/UT
Page 162: CHAPTER 11TABLE 11.8 - STATE/UT-WIS
show all

Data on Police Organisations in India - Commonwealth Human ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?