<strong>Postoperative</strong> pa<strong>in</strong>l NCCPC-PV (Non-Communicat<strong>in</strong>g Children’s Pa<strong>in</strong>Checklist – <strong>Postoperative</strong> Version) (100): <strong>in</strong>tended for3–19 year olds.l PPP (The Pediatric Pa<strong>in</strong> Profile) (101): <strong>in</strong>tended for1–18 year olds.• Revised FLACC (50): <strong>in</strong>tended for 4–19 year olds.Parent report of their child’s postoperative pa<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>tensityThe most psychometrically sound <strong>and</strong> feasible parentreport tool, based on age/developmental level <strong>and</strong> typeof pa<strong>in</strong>, has been recommended for use <strong>in</strong> cl<strong>in</strong>ical trials(13). However, this may not necessarily directly transferto cl<strong>in</strong>ical utility <strong>and</strong> more research is needed.• PPPM (Parents <strong>Postoperative</strong> Pa<strong>in</strong> Measure) (95);see also (96,97).3.2.3 Physiological measuresPhysiological parameters such as heart rate variability,sk<strong>in</strong> conductance, <strong>and</strong> changes <strong>in</strong> salivary cortisol canbe used <strong>in</strong>directly to <strong>in</strong>dicate the presence of pa<strong>in</strong> (103–106). However, blood pressure, heart rate, <strong>and</strong> respiratoryrate have been shown to be unreliable <strong>in</strong>dicators <strong>in</strong>newborns, <strong>in</strong>fants, <strong>and</strong> young children with wide <strong>in</strong>ter<strong>in</strong>dividualbehavior–physiology correlations after majorsurgery <strong>in</strong> 0–3-year-old <strong>in</strong>fants (16). More recently, themagnitude of evoked cortical activity has been suggestedas a possible <strong>in</strong>dicator of pa<strong>in</strong> (107). While the methodappears promis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> correlations with other pa<strong>in</strong>measures have been found to be good, similarly to themeasurement of other physiological parameters such ascortisol changes, it has limited cl<strong>in</strong>ical utility. It is questionablewhether the pa<strong>in</strong> experience can be mean<strong>in</strong>gfullyreduced to physiological activation alone;therefore, physiological measures should be used <strong>in</strong> conjunctionwith other tools/measures to determ<strong>in</strong>e thepresence <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensity of pa<strong>in</strong>.References1 F<strong>in</strong>ley GA, Franck L, Grunau R et al. WhyChildren’s Pa<strong>in</strong> Matters. Seattle, WA: IASP,2005.2 Howard R. Current status of pa<strong>in</strong> management<strong>in</strong> children. JAMA 2003; 290: 2464–2469.3 Taylor EM, Boyer K, Campbell FA. Pa<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>hospitalized children: a prospective crosssectionalsurvey of pa<strong>in</strong> prevalence, <strong>in</strong>tensity,assessment <strong>and</strong> management <strong>in</strong> a Canadianpediatric teach<strong>in</strong>g hospital. Pa<strong>in</strong> ResManag 2008; 13: 25–32.4 Walter-Nicolet E, Annequ<strong>in</strong> D, Biran V etal. Pa<strong>in</strong> management <strong>in</strong> newborns: fromprevention to treatment. Paediatr Drugs2010; 12: 353–365.5 An<strong>and</strong> KJ, Ar<strong>and</strong>a JV, Berde CB et al. Summaryproceed<strong>in</strong>gs from the neonatal pa<strong>in</strong>controlgroup. Pediatrics 2006; 117: S9–S22.6 Prevention <strong>and</strong> <strong>Management</strong> of Pa<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong>Stress <strong>in</strong> the Newborn. Committee on Fetus<strong>and</strong> Newborn Canadian Pediatric Society.Pediatrics 2000; 105: 454–461.7 Improv<strong>in</strong>g Services for Children <strong>in</strong> Hospital.London: Commission for Healthcare Audit<strong>and</strong> Inspection UK, 2007.8 Mac<strong>in</strong>tyre PE, Schug SA, Scott DA et al.Acute Pa<strong>in</strong> <strong>Management</strong>: Scientific Evidence(3rd edition). 3rd edition edn. Melbourne:Work<strong>in</strong>g Group of the Australian <strong>and</strong> NewZeal<strong>and</strong> College of Anaesthetists <strong>and</strong>Faculty of Pa<strong>in</strong> Medic<strong>in</strong>e, 2010.9 Stapelkamp C, Carter B, Gordon J et al.Assessment of acute pa<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> children:development of evidence-based guidel<strong>in</strong>es.Int J Evid Based Healthc 2011; 9: 39–50.10 Cl<strong>in</strong>ical Guidel<strong>in</strong>es for the Recognition <strong>and</strong>Assessment of Acute Pa<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> Children.Royal College of Nurs<strong>in</strong>g Institute, 2009.Available at: www.rcn.org.uk/childrenspa<strong>in</strong>guidel<strong>in</strong>e.11 Guidel<strong>in</strong>es for <strong>Good</strong> <strong>Practice</strong>: Recognition<strong>and</strong> Assessment of Acute Pa<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> Children.London: RCPCH, 2001.12 Cohen LL, La Greca AM, Blount RL et al.Introduction to special issue: evidence-basedassessment <strong>in</strong> pediatric psychology. J PediatrPsychol 2008; 33: 911–915.13 St<strong>in</strong>son J, Kavanagh T, Yamada J et al.Systematic review of the psychometric properties,<strong>in</strong>terpretability <strong>and</strong> feasibility of selfreportpa<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensity measures for use <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ical trials <strong>in</strong> children <strong>and</strong> adolescents.Pa<strong>in</strong> 2006; 125: 143–157.14 von Baeyer C, Spagrud L. Systematic reviewof observational (behavioral) measures ofpa<strong>in</strong> for children <strong>and</strong> adolescents aged 3 to18 years. Pa<strong>in</strong> 2007; 127: 140–150.15 von Baeyer CL, Forsyth SJ, Stanford EAet al. Response biases <strong>in</strong> preschoolchildren’s rat<strong>in</strong>gs of pa<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> hypotheticalsituations. Eur J Pa<strong>in</strong> 2009; 13: 209–213.16 Buttner W, F<strong>in</strong>cke W. Analysis of behavioural<strong>and</strong> physiological parameters for theassessment of postoperative analgesicdem<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> newborns, <strong>in</strong>fants <strong>and</strong> young children.Paediatr Anaesth 2000; 10: 303–318.17 van Dijk M, de Boer JB, Koot HM et al.The association between physiological <strong>and</strong>behavioral pa<strong>in</strong> measures <strong>in</strong> 0-to 3-year-old<strong>in</strong>fants after major surgery. J Pa<strong>in</strong> SymptomManage 2001; 22: 600–609.18 Howard R. Plann<strong>in</strong>g for pa<strong>in</strong> relief. In: L<strong>in</strong>dahlS, ed. Cl<strong>in</strong>ical Anaesthesiology: PaediatricAnaesthesia. London: Bailliere T<strong>in</strong>dall,1996: 657–676.19 Salantera S, Lauri S, Salmi T et al. Nurses’knowledge about pharmacological <strong>and</strong> nonpharmacologicalpa<strong>in</strong> management <strong>in</strong> children.J Pa<strong>in</strong> Symptom Manage 1999; 18:289–299.20 Samuels JG, Fetzer S. Development of theSamuels scale to rate pa<strong>in</strong> management documentation.Pa<strong>in</strong> Manag Nurs 2008; 9: 166–170.21 Furyk J, Sumner M. Pa<strong>in</strong> score documentation<strong>and</strong> analgesia: a comparison of children<strong>and</strong> adults with appendicitis. Emerg MedAustralas 2008; 20: 482–487.22 Faries JE, Mills DS, Goldsmith KW et al.Systematic pa<strong>in</strong> records <strong>and</strong> their impact onpa<strong>in</strong> control – a pilot-study. Cancer Nurs1991; 14: 306–313.23 Treadwell MJ, Franck LS, Vich<strong>in</strong>sky E.Us<strong>in</strong>g quality improvement strategies toenhance pediatric pa<strong>in</strong> assessment. IntJ Qual Health Care 2002; 14: 39–47.24 Stomberg WM, Lorentzen P, Joelsson H etal. <strong>Postoperative</strong> pa<strong>in</strong> management on surgicalwards-impact of database documentation14 ª 2012 Blackwell Publish<strong>in</strong>g Ltd, Pediatric Anesthesia, 22 (Suppl. 1), 1–79
of anesthesia organized services. Pa<strong>in</strong>Manag Nurs 2003; 4: 155–164.25 McJunk<strong>in</strong>s A, Green A, An<strong>and</strong> KJS. Pa<strong>in</strong>assessment <strong>in</strong> cognitively impaired, functionallyimpaired children: pilot study results.J Pediatr Nurs 2010; 25: 307–309.26 Harrison D, Loughnan P, Johnston L. Pa<strong>in</strong>assessment <strong>and</strong> procedural pa<strong>in</strong> managementpractices <strong>in</strong> neonatal units <strong>in</strong> Australia.J Paediatr Child Health 2006; 42: 6–9.27 Smyth W, Toombes J, Usher K. Children’spostoperative pro re nata (PRN) analgesia:nurses’ adm<strong>in</strong>istration practices. ContempNurse 2011; 37: 160–172.28 Price A, Ong J, Isedale G et al. Document<strong>in</strong>g<strong>and</strong> treat<strong>in</strong>g acute pa<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> children.Emerg Nurse 2011; 19: 18–20.29 Stevens BJ, Abbott LK, Yamada J et al.Epidemiology <strong>and</strong> management of pa<strong>in</strong>fulprocedures <strong>in</strong> children <strong>in</strong> Canadian hospitals.Can Med Assoc J 2011; 183: E403–E410.30 Kohler H, Schulz S, Wiebalck A. Pa<strong>in</strong> management<strong>in</strong> children: assessment <strong>and</strong> documentation<strong>in</strong> burn units. Eur J Pediatr Surg2001; 11: 40–43.31 Simons J, Moseley L. Influences on nurses’scor<strong>in</strong>g of children’s post-operative pa<strong>in</strong>.J Child Health Care 2009; 13: 101–115.32 Shrestha-Ranjit JM, Manias E. Pa<strong>in</strong> assessment<strong>and</strong> management practices <strong>in</strong> childrenfollow<strong>in</strong>g surgery of the lower limb. J Cl<strong>in</strong>Nurs 2010; 19: 118–128.33 Falanga IJ, Lafrenaye S, Mayer SK et al.<strong>Management</strong> of acute pa<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> children:safety <strong>and</strong> efficacy of a nurse-controlledalgorithm for pa<strong>in</strong> relief. Acute Pa<strong>in</strong> 2006;8: 45–54.34 Rajasagaram U, Taylor DM, Braitberg G etal. Paediatric pa<strong>in</strong> assessment: differencesbetween triage nurse, child <strong>and</strong> parent.J Paediatr Child Health 2009; 45: 199–203.35 von Baeyer CL. Children’s self-report ofpa<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensity: scale selection, limitations<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpretation. Pa<strong>in</strong> Res Manage 2006;11: 157–162.36 Stanford E, Chambers C, Craig K. The roleof developmental factors <strong>in</strong> predict<strong>in</strong>gyoung children’s use of a self-report scalefor pa<strong>in</strong>. Pa<strong>in</strong> 2006; 120: 16–23.37 de C Williams AC, Davies HT, Chadury Y.Simple pa<strong>in</strong> rat<strong>in</strong>g scales hide complex idiosyncraticmean<strong>in</strong>gs. Pa<strong>in</strong> 2000; 85: 457–463.38 Azize PM, Humphreys A, Cattani A. Theimpact of language on the expression <strong>and</strong>assessment of pa<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> children. Intensive CritCare Nurs 2011; 27: 235–243.39 Fortier MA, Anderson CT, Ka<strong>in</strong> ZN. Ethnicitymatters <strong>in</strong> the assessment <strong>and</strong> treatmentof children’s pa<strong>in</strong>. Pediatrics 2009;124: 378–380.40 Hodg<strong>in</strong>s MJ. Interpret<strong>in</strong>g the mean<strong>in</strong>g ofpa<strong>in</strong> severity scores. [Review] [59 refs]. Pa<strong>in</strong>Res Manage 2002; 7: 192–198.41 Champion D, <strong>Good</strong>enough B, von BaeyerC et al. In: F<strong>in</strong>ley G, McGrath P, eds.Measurement of Pa<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> Infants <strong>and</strong>Children. Seattle, WA: IASP Press, 1998:123–155.42 Chambers C, Johnston C. Developmentaldifferences <strong>in</strong> children’s use of rat<strong>in</strong>g scales.J Pediatr Psychol 2002; 27: 27–36.43 <strong>Good</strong>enough B, Addicoat L, Champion Get al. Pa<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> 4- to 6-year-old childrenreceiv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tramuscular <strong>in</strong>jections: a comparisonof the Faces Pa<strong>in</strong> Scale with otherself-report <strong>and</strong> behavioral measures. Cl<strong>in</strong> JPa<strong>in</strong> 1997; 13: 60–73.44 Hicks C, von BC, Spafford P et al. TheFaces Pa<strong>in</strong> Scale-Revised: toward a commonmetric <strong>in</strong> pediatric pa<strong>in</strong> measurement.Pa<strong>in</strong> 2001; 93: 173–183.45 Decruynaere C, Thonnard JL, Plaghki L.How many response levels do children dist<strong>in</strong>guishon faces scales for pa<strong>in</strong> assessment?Eur J Pa<strong>in</strong> 2009; 13: 641–648.46 Voepel-Lewis T, Burke CN, Jeffreys N et al.Do 0-10 numeric rat<strong>in</strong>g scores translate <strong>in</strong>tocl<strong>in</strong>ically mean<strong>in</strong>gful pa<strong>in</strong> measures for children?Anesth Analg 2011; 112: 415–421.47 Simons J, Roberson E. Poor communication<strong>and</strong> knowledge deficits: obstacles to effectivemanagement of children’s postoperativepa<strong>in</strong>. J Adv Nurs 2002; 40: 78–86.48 Schultz M, Loughran-Fowlds A, Spence K.Neonatal pa<strong>in</strong>: a comparison of the beliefs<strong>and</strong> practices of junior doctors <strong>and</strong> currentbest evidence. J Paediatr Child Health 2010;46: 23–28.49 Polkki T, Korhonen A, Laukkala H et al.Nurses’ attitudes <strong>and</strong> perceptions of pa<strong>in</strong>assessment <strong>in</strong> neonatal <strong>in</strong>tensive care. Sc<strong>and</strong>J Car<strong>in</strong>g Sci 2010; 24: 49–55.50 Malviya S, Voepel-Lewis T, Burke C et al.The revised FLACC observational pa<strong>in</strong>tool: improved reliability <strong>and</strong> validity forpa<strong>in</strong> assessment <strong>in</strong> children with cognitiveimpairment. Pediatr Anesth 2006; 16: 258–265.51 Zhou H, Roberts P, Horgan L. Associationbetween self-report pa<strong>in</strong> rat<strong>in</strong>gs of child <strong>and</strong>parent, child <strong>and</strong> nurse <strong>and</strong> parent <strong>and</strong>nurse dyads: meta-analysis. J Adv Nurs2008; 63: 334–342.52 Boyd RJ, Stuart P. The efficacy of structuredassessment <strong>and</strong> analgesia provision <strong>in</strong>the paediatric emergency department. EmergMed J 2005; 22: 30–32.53 Johnston CC, Gagnon A, Rennick J et al.One-on-one coach<strong>in</strong>g to improve pa<strong>in</strong>assessment <strong>and</strong> management practices ofpediatric nurses. J Pediatr Nurs 2007; 22:467–478.54 Craig KD, Lilley CM, Gilbert CA. Socialbarriers to optimal pa<strong>in</strong> management <strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>fants <strong>and</strong> children. Cl<strong>in</strong> J Pa<strong>in</strong> 1996; 12:232–242.55 Pillai Riddell RR, Horton RE, Hillgrove Jet al. Underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g caregiver judgments of<strong>in</strong>fant pa<strong>in</strong>: contrasts of parents, nurses <strong>and</strong>pediatricians. Pa<strong>in</strong> Res Manag 2008; 13:489–496.56 Walker SM, Franck LS, Fitzgerald M et al.Long-term impact of neonatal <strong>in</strong>tensive care<strong>and</strong> surgery on somatosensory perception <strong>in</strong>children born extremely preterm. Pa<strong>in</strong> 2009;141: 79–87.57 Cignacco E, Hamers JPH, Stoffel L et al.Rout<strong>in</strong>e procedures <strong>in</strong> NICUs: factors <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>gpa<strong>in</strong> assessment <strong>and</strong> rank<strong>in</strong>g by pa<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>tensity. Swiss Med Wkly 2008; 138: 484–491.58 Breau L, McGrath P, Stevens B et al. Judgmentsof pa<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> the neonatal <strong>in</strong>tensive caresett<strong>in</strong>g: a survey of direct care staffs’ perceptionsof pa<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>fants at risk for neurologicalimpairment. Cl<strong>in</strong> J Pa<strong>in</strong> 2006; 22: 122–129.59 Breau L, MacLaren J, McGrath P et al.Caregivers’ beliefs regard<strong>in</strong>g pa<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> childrenwith cognitive impairment: relation betweenpa<strong>in</strong> sensation <strong>and</strong> reaction <strong>in</strong>creases withseverity of impairment. Cl<strong>in</strong> J Pa<strong>in</strong> 2003;19: 335–344.60 Kankkunen P, Vehvila<strong>in</strong>en-Julkunen K, PietilaA et al. Parents’ perceptions <strong>and</strong> use ofanalgesics at home after children’s day surgery.Paediatr Anaesth 2003; 13: 132–140.61 Polkki T, Vehvila<strong>in</strong>en-Julkunen K, PietilaA. Parents’ roles <strong>in</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g non-pharmacologicalmethods <strong>in</strong> their child’s postoperativepa<strong>in</strong> alleviation. J Cl<strong>in</strong> Nurs 2002; 11: 526–536.62 Simons J, Franck L, Roberson E. Parent<strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>in</strong> children’s pa<strong>in</strong> care: views ofparents <strong>and</strong> nurses. J Adv Nurs 2001; 36:591–599.63 Rony RYZ, Fortier MA, Chorney JM et al.Parental postoperative pa<strong>in</strong> management:attitudes, assessment, <strong>and</strong> management.Pediatrics 2010; 125: e1372–e1378.64 Voepel-Lewis T, Malviya S, Tait A. Validityof parent rat<strong>in</strong>gs as proxy measures of pa<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong> children with cognitive impairment. Pa<strong>in</strong>Manag Nurs 2005; 6: 168–174.65 Merkel SMS, Voepel-Lewis T, MalviyaSMD. Pa<strong>in</strong> assessment <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>fants <strong>and</strong> youngchildren: the FLACC Scale: a behavioraltool to measure pa<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> young children.Am J Nurs 2002; 102: 55–58.66 Mathew PJ, Mathew JL. Assessment <strong>and</strong>management of pa<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>fants. PostgradMed J 2003; 79: 438–443.67 Breau LM, Burkitt C. Assess<strong>in</strong>g pa<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>children with <strong>in</strong>tellectual disabilities. Pa<strong>in</strong>Res Manage 2009; 14: 116–120.ª 2012 Blackwell Publish<strong>in</strong>g Ltd, Pediatric Anesthesia, 22 (Suppl. 1), 1–79 15
- Page 1 and 2: PediatricAnesthesiaVolume 22 Supple
- Page 3 and 4: doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2012.3838.
- Page 5 and 6: 1.6 Contact informationCorresponden
- Page 7 and 8: RecommendationsChildren’s self-re
- Page 9 and 10: Topical anesthetic preparations, fo
- Page 11 and 12: 2.7.6 Laparoscopic surgeryGood prac
- Page 13 and 14: In order to assess pain, effective
- Page 18 and 19: 68 Broome ME, Richtsmeier A, Maikle
- Page 20 and 21: however, reductions in the response
- Page 22 and 23: increased success rate (i.e., less
- Page 24 and 25: Newer preparations such as liposoma
- Page 26 and 27: Good practice pointLubricant contai
- Page 28 and 29: most effective. There are a number
- Page 30 and 31: 12 Bellieni C, Bagnoli F, Perrone S
- Page 32 and 33: venipuncture pain in a pediatric em
- Page 34 and 35: 172 van Twillert B, Bremer M, Faber
- Page 36 and 37: necessary to ensure that the patien
- Page 38 and 39: when compared with LA alone and sal
- Page 40 and 41: Peribulbar block improves early ana
- Page 42 and 43: Analgesia Table 5.5.1 Sub-umbilical
- Page 44 and 45: was more effective with less motor
- Page 46 and 47: with using landmark techniques (205
- Page 48 and 49: Good practice pointWound infiltrati
- Page 50 and 51: Analgesia Table 5.6.4 Urological Su
- Page 52 and 53: (298). Ketorolac did not influence
- Page 54 and 55: well as the epidural technique for
- Page 56 and 57: Good practice pointA multi-modal an
- Page 58 and 59: 14 Grainger J, Saravanappa N. Local
- Page 60 and 61: day-stay unit. Int J Paediatr Dent
- Page 62 and 63: tinuous epidural infusion in childr
- Page 64 and 65: 245 Morton NS, O’Brien K. Analges
- Page 66 and 67:
321 Taenzer AH, Clark C, Taenzer AH
- Page 68 and 69:
Section 6.0AnalgesiaContents6.1 Ana
- Page 70 and 71:
enhance systemic absorption. Lidoca
- Page 73 and 74:
undergoes hepatic biotransformation
- Page 75 and 76:
tein binding are reduced and the ha
- Page 77 and 78:
a low-dose infusion but the child m
- Page 79 and 80:
Table 6.6.1 Paracetamol dosing guid
- Page 81:
steps that health care professional