13.07.2015 Views

Good Practice in Postoperative and Procedural Pain Management ...

Good Practice in Postoperative and Procedural Pain Management ...

Good Practice in Postoperative and Procedural Pain Management ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

day-stay unit. Int J Paediatr Dent 2004; 14:9–16.90 Gazal G, Mackie IC. Distress related todental extraction for children under generalanaesthesia <strong>and</strong> their parents. Eur J PaediatrDent 2007; 8: 7–12.91 O’Donnell A, Henderson M, Fearne J et al.<strong>Management</strong> of postoperative pa<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> childrenfollow<strong>in</strong>g extractions of primary teethunder general anaesthesia: a comparison ofparacetamol, Voltarol <strong>and</strong> no analgesia. IntJ Paediatr Dent 2007; 17: 110–115.92 Townsend JA, Ganzberg S, Thikkurissy S.The effect of local anesthetic on quality ofrecovery characteristics follow<strong>in</strong>g dentalrehabilitation under general anesthesia <strong>in</strong>children. Anesth Prog 2009; 56: 115–122.93 Littlejohn IH, Tarl<strong>in</strong>g MM, Flynn PJ et al.Post-operative pa<strong>in</strong> relief <strong>in</strong> children follow<strong>in</strong>gextraction of carious deciduous teethunder general anaesthesia: a comparison ofnalbuph<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong> diclofenac. Eur J Anaesthesiol1996; 13: 359–363.94 Purday J, Reichert C, Merrick P. Comparativeeffects of three doses of <strong>in</strong>travenousketorolac or morph<strong>in</strong>e on emesis <strong>and</strong> analgesiafor restorative dental surgery <strong>in</strong> children.Can J Anaesth 1996; 43: 221–225.95 Alhashemi JA, Daghistani MF. Effect of <strong>in</strong>traoperative<strong>in</strong>travenous acetam<strong>in</strong>ophen vs.<strong>in</strong>tramuscular meperid<strong>in</strong>e on pa<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> dischargetime after paediatric dental restoration.Eur J Anaesthesiol 2007; 24: 128–133.96 Bhananker SM, Azavedo LF, Spl<strong>in</strong>ter WM.Addition of morph<strong>in</strong>e to local anesthetic<strong>in</strong>filtration does not improve analgesia afterpediatric dental extractions. Paediatr Anaesth2008; 18: 140–144.97 Ho D, Keneally J. Analgesia follow<strong>in</strong>g paediatricday-surgical orchidopexy <strong>and</strong> herniotomy.Paediatr Anaesth 2000; 10: 627–631.98 Anatol TI, Pitt-Miller P, Holder Y. Trial ofthree methods of <strong>in</strong>traoperative bupivaca<strong>in</strong>eanalgesia for pa<strong>in</strong> after paediatric gro<strong>in</strong> surgery.Can J Anaesth 1997; 44: 1053–1059.99 Ivani G, DeNegri P, Conio A et al. Comparisonof racemic bupivaca<strong>in</strong>e, ropivaca<strong>in</strong>e,<strong>and</strong> levo-bupivaca<strong>in</strong>e for pediatric caudalanesthesia: effects on postoperative analgesia<strong>and</strong> motor block. Reg Anesth Pa<strong>in</strong> Med2002; 27: 157–161.100 Ivani G, Conio A, De NP et al. Sp<strong>in</strong>al versusperipheral effects of adjunct clonid<strong>in</strong>e:comparison of the analgesic effect of a ropivaca<strong>in</strong>e-clonid<strong>in</strong>emixture when adm<strong>in</strong>isteredas a caudal or ilio<strong>in</strong>gu<strong>in</strong>aliliohypogastricnerve blockade for <strong>in</strong>gu<strong>in</strong>alsurgery <strong>in</strong> children. Paediatr Anaesth 2002;12: 680–684.101 Suraseranivongse S, Chowvanayot<strong>in</strong> S, PirayavarapornS et al. Effect of bupivaca<strong>in</strong>ewith ep<strong>in</strong>ephr<strong>in</strong>e wound <strong>in</strong>stillation for pa<strong>in</strong>relief after pediatric <strong>in</strong>gu<strong>in</strong>al herniorrhaphy<strong>and</strong> hydrocelectomy. Reg Anesth Pa<strong>in</strong> Med2003; 28: 24–28.102 Ivani G, De Negri P, Lonnqvist PA et al.Caudal anesthesia for m<strong>in</strong>or pediatric surgery:a prospective r<strong>and</strong>omized comparisonof ropivaca<strong>in</strong>e 0.2% vs levobupivaca<strong>in</strong>e0.2%. Paediatr Anaesth 2005; 15: 491–494.103 Fredrickson MJ, Pa<strong>in</strong>e C, Hamill J.Improved analgesia with the ilio<strong>in</strong>gu<strong>in</strong>alblock compared to the transversus abdom<strong>in</strong>isplane block after pediatric <strong>in</strong>gu<strong>in</strong>al surgery:a prospective r<strong>and</strong>omized trial.Paediatr Anaesth 2010; 20: 1022–1027.104 Giaufre E, Dalens B, Gombert A. Epidemiology<strong>and</strong> morbidity of regional anesthesia<strong>in</strong> children: a one-year prospective survey ofthe French-Language Society of PediatricAnesthesiologists. Anesth Analg 1996; 83:904–912.105 Cook TM, Counsell D, Wildsmith JA.Major complications of central neuraxialblock: report on the Third National AuditProject of the Royal College of Anaesthetists.Br J Anaesth 2009; 102: 179–190.106 Ecoffey C, Lacroix F, Giaufre E et al. Epidemiology<strong>and</strong> morbidity of regional anesthesia<strong>in</strong> children: a follow-up one-yearprospective survey of the French-LanguageSociety of Paediatric Anaesthesiologists(ADARPEF). Paediatr Anaesth 2010; 20:1061–1069.107 Brenner L, Kettner SC, Marhofer P et al.Caudal anaesthesia under sedation: a prospectiveanalysis of 512 <strong>in</strong>fants <strong>and</strong> children.Br J Anaesth 2010; 104: 751–755.108 Breschan C, Jost R, Krumpholz R et al. Aprospective study compar<strong>in</strong>g the analgesicefficacy of levobupivaca<strong>in</strong>e, ropivaca<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong>bupivaca<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> pediatric patients undergo<strong>in</strong>gcaudal blockade. Paediatr Anaesth 2005; 15:301–306.109 Ingelmo P, Frawley G, Astuto M et al. Relativeanalgesic potencies of levobupivaca<strong>in</strong>e<strong>and</strong> ropivaca<strong>in</strong>e for caudal anesthesia <strong>in</strong>children. Anesth Analg 2009; 108: 805–813.110 Luz G, Innerhofer P, Haussler B et al.Comparison of ropivaca<strong>in</strong>e 0.1% <strong>and</strong> 0.2%with bupivaca<strong>in</strong>e 0.2% for s<strong>in</strong>gle-shot caudalanaesthesia <strong>in</strong> children. Paediatr Anaesth2000; 10: 499–504.111 Bosenberg A, Thomas J, Lopez T et al. Theefficacy of caudal ropivaca<strong>in</strong>e 1, 2 <strong>and</strong>3mg· l()1) for postoperative analgesia <strong>in</strong>children. Paediatr Anaesth 2002; 12: 53–58.112 Ivani G, De NP, Lonnqvist P et al. A comparisonof three different concentrations oflevobupivaca<strong>in</strong>e for caudal block <strong>in</strong> children.Anesth Analg 2003; 97: 368–371.113 Gulec S, Buyukkidan B, Oral N et al. Comparisonof caudal bupivaca<strong>in</strong>e, bupivaca<strong>in</strong>emorph<strong>in</strong>e<strong>and</strong> bupivaca<strong>in</strong>e-midazolam mixturesfor post-operative analgesia <strong>in</strong> children.Eur J Anaesthesiol 1998; 15: 161–165.114 Ivani G, De Negri P, Conio A et al. Ropivaca<strong>in</strong>e-clonid<strong>in</strong>ecomb<strong>in</strong>ation for caudalblockade <strong>in</strong> children. Acta AnaesthesiolSc<strong>and</strong> 2000; 44: 446–449.115 Khan F, Memon G, Kamal R. Effect ofroute of buprenorph<strong>in</strong>e on recovery <strong>and</strong>postoperative analgesic requirement <strong>in</strong> paediatricpatients. Paediatr Anaesth 2002; 12:786–790.116 Anserm<strong>in</strong>o M, Basu R, V<strong>and</strong>ebeek C et al.Nonopioid additives to local anaestheticsfor caudal blockade <strong>in</strong> children: a systematicreview. Paediatr Anaesth 2003; 13: 561–573.117 Turan A, Memis D, Basaran UN et al. Caudalropivaca<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong> neostigm<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> pediatricsurgery. Anesthesiology 2003; 98: 719–722.118 Weber F, Wulf H. Caudal bupivaca<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong>s(+)-ketam<strong>in</strong>e for postoperative analgesia<strong>in</strong> children. Paediatr Anaesth 2003; 13: 244–248.119 Bano F, Haider S, Sultan ST. Comparisonof caudal bupivaca<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong> bupivaca<strong>in</strong>e-midazolamfor peri <strong>and</strong> postoperative analgesia<strong>in</strong> children. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak2004; 14: 65–68.120 Mart<strong>in</strong>dale S, Dix P, Stoddart P. Doublebl<strong>in</strong>dr<strong>and</strong>omized controlled trial of caudalversus <strong>in</strong>travenous S(+)-ketam<strong>in</strong>e for supplementationof caudal analgesia <strong>in</strong> children.Br J Anaesth 2004; 92: 344–347.121 Saadawy I, Boker A, Elshahawy MA et al.Effect of dexmedetomid<strong>in</strong>e on the characteristicsof bupivaca<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> a caudal block <strong>in</strong>pediatrics. Acta Anaesthesiol Sc<strong>and</strong> 2009; 53:251–256.122 Shukla U, Prabhakar T, Malhotra K. <strong>Postoperative</strong>analgesia <strong>in</strong> children when us<strong>in</strong>gclonid<strong>in</strong>e or fentanyl with ropivaca<strong>in</strong>e givencaudally. J Anaesthesiol Cl<strong>in</strong> Pharmacol2011; 27: 205–210.123 Disma N, Frawley G, Mameli L et al. Effectof epidural clonid<strong>in</strong>e on m<strong>in</strong>imum localanesthetic concentration (ED50) of levobupivaca<strong>in</strong>efor caudal block <strong>in</strong> children. PaediatrAnaesth 2011; 21: 128–135.124 Pradhan B, Bajracharya GR. Midazolamfor caudal analgesia <strong>in</strong> children: comparisonwith caudal bupivaca<strong>in</strong>e. Kathm<strong>and</strong>u UnivMed J (KUMJ) 2008; 6: 166–172.125 Birbicer H, Doruk N, C<strong>in</strong>el I et al. Couldadd<strong>in</strong>g magnesium as adjuvant to ropivaca<strong>in</strong>e<strong>in</strong> caudal anaesthesia improve postoperativepa<strong>in</strong> control ? Pediatr Surg Int 2007;23: 195–198.126 Erol A, Tavlan A, Tuncer S et al. Caudalanesthesia for m<strong>in</strong>or subumbilical pediatricsurgery: a comparison of levobupivaca<strong>in</strong>ealone <strong>and</strong> levobupivaca<strong>in</strong>e plus sufentanil. JCl<strong>in</strong> Anesth 2008; 20: 442–446.127 Ak<strong>in</strong> A, Ocalan S, Esmaoglu A et al. Theeffects of caudal or <strong>in</strong>travenous clonid<strong>in</strong>e onpostoperative analgesia produced by caudal58 ª 2012 Blackwell Publish<strong>in</strong>g Ltd, Pediatric Anesthesia, 22 (Suppl. 1), 1–79

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!