13.07.2015 Views

Good Practice in Postoperative and Procedural Pain Management ...

Good Practice in Postoperative and Procedural Pain Management ...

Good Practice in Postoperative and Procedural Pain Management ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

venipuncture pa<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> a pediatric emergencydepartment. Pediatr Emerg Care 2011; 27:1151–1156.94 Liossi C, White P, Hatira P. R<strong>and</strong>omizedcl<strong>in</strong>ical trial of local anesthetic versus acomb<strong>in</strong>ation of local anesthetic with selfhypnosis<strong>in</strong> the management of pediatricprocedure-related pa<strong>in</strong>. Health Psychol2006; 25: 307–315.95 Carraccio C, Fe<strong>in</strong>berg P, Hart LS et al.Lidoca<strong>in</strong>e for lumbar punctures. A help nota h<strong>in</strong>drance. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med1996; 150: 1044–1046.96 Juarez Gimenez J, Oliveras M, Hidalgo E etal. Anesthetic efficacy of eutectic priloca<strong>in</strong>elidoca<strong>in</strong>ecream <strong>in</strong> pediatric oncologypatients undergo<strong>in</strong>g lumbar puncture. AnnPharmacother 1996; 30: 1235–1237.97 Kanagasundaram SA, Lane LJ, CavallettoBP et al. Efficacy <strong>and</strong> safety of nitrousoxide <strong>in</strong> alleviat<strong>in</strong>g pa<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> anxiety dur<strong>in</strong>gpa<strong>in</strong>ful procedures. Arch Dis Child 2001; 84:492–495.98 Crock C, Olsson C, Phillips R et al. Generalanaesthesia or conscious sedation for pa<strong>in</strong>fulprocedures <strong>in</strong> childhood cancer: the family’sperspective. Arch Dis Child 2003; 88:253–257.99 Ljungman G, Gordh T, Sorensen S et al.Lumbar puncture <strong>in</strong> pediatric oncology:conscious sedation vs. general anesthesia.Med Pediatr Oncol 2001; 36: 372–379.100 Evans D, Turnham L, Barbour K et al.Intravenous ketam<strong>in</strong>e sedation for pa<strong>in</strong>fuloncology procedures. Pediatr Anesth 2005;15: 131–138.101 Iannalfi A, Bern<strong>in</strong>i G, Caprilli S et al. Pa<strong>in</strong>fulprocedures <strong>in</strong> children with cancer: comparisonof moderate sedation <strong>and</strong> generalanesthesia for lumbar puncture <strong>and</strong> bonemarrow aspiration. Pediatr Blood Cancer2005; 45: 933–938.102 Fe<strong>in</strong> D, Avner JR, Kh<strong>in</strong>e H. Pattern of pa<strong>in</strong>management dur<strong>in</strong>g lumbar puncture <strong>in</strong>children. Pediatr Emerg Care 2010; 26: 357–360.103 Hoyle JD Jr, Rogers AJ, Reischman DE etal. Pa<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tervention for <strong>in</strong>fant lumbarpuncture <strong>in</strong> the emergency department: physicianpractice <strong>and</strong> beliefs. Acad Emerg Med2011; 18: 140–144.104 Apiliogullari S, Duman A, Gok F et al.Sp<strong>in</strong>al needle design <strong>and</strong> size affect the <strong>in</strong>cidenceof postdural puncture headache <strong>in</strong>children. Pediatr Anesth 2010; 20: 177–182.105 Bruce EA, Howard RF, Franck LS. Chestdra<strong>in</strong> removal pa<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> its management: aliterature review. J Cl<strong>in</strong> Nurs 2006; 15: 145–154.106 Rosen DA, Morris JL, Rosen KR et al.Analgesia for pediatric thoracostomy tuberemoval. Anesth Analg 2000; 90: 1025–1028.107 Bruce E, Franck L, Howard RF. The efficacyof morph<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong> Entonox analgesiadur<strong>in</strong>g chest dra<strong>in</strong> removal <strong>in</strong> children. PediatrAnesth 2006; 16: 302–308.108 Bruce E, Franck L. Self-adm<strong>in</strong>isterednitrous oxide (Entonox) for the managementof procedural pa<strong>in</strong>. Paediatr Nurs 2000; 12:15–19.109 Akrofi M, Miller S, Colfar S et al. A r<strong>and</strong>omizedcomparison of three methods ofanalgesia for chest dra<strong>in</strong> removal <strong>in</strong> postcardiacsurgical patients. Anesth Analg 2005;100: 205–209.110 Charlton J. Pa<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> children. Core Curriculumfor Professional Education <strong>in</strong> Pa<strong>in</strong>.Seattle: IASP Press, 2005: 113–117.111 Phillips DA, Watson AR, MacK<strong>in</strong>lay D.Distress <strong>and</strong> the micturat<strong>in</strong>g cystourethrogram:does preparation help? Acta Paediatr1998; 87: 175–179.112 Butler L, Symons B, Henderson S et al.Hypnosis reduces distress <strong>and</strong> duration ofan <strong>in</strong>vasive medical procedure for children.Pediatrics 2005; 115: e77–e85.113 Vaughan M, Paton EA, Bush A et al. Doeslidoca<strong>in</strong>e gel alleviate the pa<strong>in</strong> of bladdercatheterization <strong>in</strong> young children? A r<strong>and</strong>omized,controlled trial. Pediatrics 2005;116: 917–920.114 S<strong>and</strong>y NS, Nguyen HT, Z<strong>in</strong>iel SI et al.Assessment of parental satisfaction <strong>in</strong> childrenundergo<strong>in</strong>g void<strong>in</strong>g cystourethrographywithout sedation. J Urol 2011; 185: 658–662.115 Gerard LL, Cooper CS, Duethman KS etal. Effectiveness of lidoca<strong>in</strong>e lubricant fordiscomfort dur<strong>in</strong>g pediatric urethral catheterization.The Journal of urology 2003; 170:564–567.116 Stevens B. Use of 2% lidoca<strong>in</strong>e gel dur<strong>in</strong>gbladder catheterisation did not reduce procedurerelated pa<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> young children. EvidBased Nurs 2006; 9: 41.117 S<strong>in</strong>ger AJ, Konia N. Comparison of topicalanesthetics <strong>and</strong> vasoconstrictors vs lubricantsprior to nasogastric <strong>in</strong>tubation: a r<strong>and</strong>omized,controlled trial. Acad Emerg Med1999; 6: 184–190.118 Wolfe TR, Fosnocht DE, L<strong>in</strong>scott MS.Atomized lidoca<strong>in</strong>e as topical anesthesia fornasogastric tube placement: a r<strong>and</strong>omized,double-bl<strong>in</strong>d, placebo-controlled trial. AnnEmerg Med 2000; 35: 421–425.119 Ozucelik DN, Karaca MA, Sivri B. Effectivenessof pre-emptive metoclopramide<strong>in</strong>fusion <strong>in</strong> alleviat<strong>in</strong>g pa<strong>in</strong>, discomfort <strong>and</strong>nausea associated with nasogastric tube<strong>in</strong>sertion: a r<strong>and</strong>omised, double-bl<strong>in</strong>d, placebo-controlledtrial. Int J Cl<strong>in</strong> Pract 2005;59: 1422–1427.120 Cullen L, Taylor D, Taylor S et al. Nebulizedlidoca<strong>in</strong>e decreases the discomfort ofnasogastric tube <strong>in</strong>sertion: a r<strong>and</strong>omized,double-bl<strong>in</strong>d trial. Ann Emerg Med 2004;44: 131–137.121 Babl FE, Goldf<strong>in</strong>ch C, M<strong>and</strong>rawa C et al.Does nebulized lidoca<strong>in</strong>e reduce the pa<strong>in</strong><strong>and</strong> distress of nasogastric tube <strong>in</strong>sertion <strong>in</strong>young children? A r<strong>and</strong>omized, doublebl<strong>in</strong>d,placebo-controlled trial. Pediatrics2009; 123: 1548–1555.122 Cohen L, Blount R, Cohen R et al. Comparativestudy of distraction versus topicalanesthesia for pediatric pa<strong>in</strong> managementdur<strong>in</strong>g immunizations. Health Psychol 1999;18: 591–598.123 Cohen LL, MacLaren JE, Fortson BL et al.R<strong>and</strong>omized cl<strong>in</strong>ical trial of distraction for<strong>in</strong>fant immunization pa<strong>in</strong>. Pa<strong>in</strong> 2006; 125:165–171.124 Chambers CT, Taddio A, Uman LS et al.Psychological <strong>in</strong>terventions for reduc<strong>in</strong>gpa<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> distress dur<strong>in</strong>g rout<strong>in</strong>e childhoodimmunizations: a systematic review. Cl<strong>in</strong>Ther 2009; 31(Suppl. 2): S77–S103.125 Cohen Reis E, Holubkov R. Vapocoolantspray is equally effective as EMLA cream <strong>in</strong>reduc<strong>in</strong>g immunization pa<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> school-agedchildren. Pediatrics 1997; 100: E5.126 Mark A, Carlsson RM, Granstrom M. Subcutaneousversus <strong>in</strong>tramuscular <strong>in</strong>jection forbooster DT vacc<strong>in</strong>ation of adolescents. Vacc<strong>in</strong>e1999; 17: 2067–2072.127 Ipp M, Cohen E, Goldbach M et al. Effectof choice of measles-mumps-rubella vacc<strong>in</strong>eon immediate vacc<strong>in</strong>ation pa<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>fants.Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2004; 158: 323–326.128 Wood C, von Baeyer CL, Bourrillon A etal. Self-assessment of immediate post-vacc<strong>in</strong>ationpa<strong>in</strong> after two different MMR vacc<strong>in</strong>esadm<strong>in</strong>istered as a second dose <strong>in</strong> 4- to6-year-old children. Vacc<strong>in</strong>e 2004; 23: 127–131.129 Scheifele D, Halper<strong>in</strong> S, Ochnio J et al. Amodified vacc<strong>in</strong>e reduces the rate of large<strong>in</strong>jection site reactions to the pre schoolbooster dose of diphtheria-tetanus-acellularpertussis vacc<strong>in</strong>e: results of a r<strong>and</strong>omizedcontrolled trial. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2005;24: 1059–1066.130 Diggle L, Deeks JJ, Pollard AJ. Effect ofneedle size on immunogenicity <strong>and</strong> reactogenicityof vacc<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>fants: r<strong>and</strong>omisedcontrolled trial. BMJ 2006; 333:571.131 Taddio A, Ilersich AL, Ipp M et al. Physical<strong>in</strong>terventions <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>jection techniques forreduc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>jection pa<strong>in</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g rout<strong>in</strong>e childhoodimmunizations: systematic review ofr<strong>and</strong>omized controlled trials <strong>and</strong> quasi-r<strong>and</strong>omizedcontrolled trials. Cl<strong>in</strong> Ther 2009;31(Suppl. 2): S48–S76.132 Ipp M, Park<strong>in</strong> PC, Lear N et al. Order ofvacc<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>jection <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>fant pa<strong>in</strong> response.30 ª 2012 Blackwell Publish<strong>in</strong>g Ltd, Pediatric Anesthesia, 22 (Suppl. 1), 1–79

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!