was more effective with less motor block than ropivaca<strong>in</strong>e0.375%, 0.5 mlÆkg )1 (159).Caudal neuraxial analgesic additives a : With LA: theaddition of neostigm<strong>in</strong>e or diamorph<strong>in</strong>e to caudal bupivaca<strong>in</strong>e<strong>in</strong>creased analgesic efficacy (154,157,160) butalso <strong>in</strong>creased the rate of nausea <strong>and</strong> vomit<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> twoof the studies (154,160). Add<strong>in</strong>g tramadol to bupivavca<strong>in</strong>e<strong>in</strong>creased the analgesic efficacy <strong>in</strong> the first 24 hpostoperatively (161). In other studies, the addition oftramadol, clonid<strong>in</strong>e, or sufent<strong>in</strong>il did not <strong>in</strong>crease efficacy(153,162,163).Without LA: ketam<strong>in</strong>e or mixture of ketam<strong>in</strong>e/alfentanilwas superior to alfentanil alone, <strong>and</strong> higher dosesof neostigm<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>creased efficacy but also <strong>in</strong>creasednausea <strong>and</strong> vomit<strong>in</strong>g (164,165). In general, the use ofneuraxial analgesics has not been comprehensivelystudied, further research to identify safety profile, risk–benefit <strong>and</strong> dose are required (see also section 6.0).Only one study compared different techniques <strong>and</strong>showed that tramadol given by the caudal routedemonstrated better analgesic efficacy <strong>and</strong> lesspostoperative nausea <strong>and</strong> vomit<strong>in</strong>g than when given bythe <strong>in</strong>travenous route (166).Epidural analgesia was shown to provide goodanalgesia both <strong>in</strong>tra- <strong>and</strong> postoperatively irrespectiveof the local anesthetic agent used: bupivaca<strong>in</strong>e, levobupivaca<strong>in</strong>e,or ropivaca<strong>in</strong>e, there was an exclusionrate of 10% <strong>in</strong> one study (167) <strong>and</strong> patients hav<strong>in</strong>gan abdom<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>cision were <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> another (168).The addition of fentanyl to ropivaca<strong>in</strong>e demonstrated<strong>in</strong>creased analgesic efficacy for postoperative epidural<strong>in</strong>fusions at low (0.125%) concentrations of ropivaca<strong>in</strong>e(158).Dorsal nerve block is effective for distal hypospadiasrepair. An <strong>in</strong>vestigation of the tim<strong>in</strong>g of dorsal nerveblock either pre or postsurgery found that plac<strong>in</strong>g theblock prior to surgery improved analgesic efficacy(169).Sp<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>trathecal neuraxial analgesia us<strong>in</strong>g hyperbaric0.5% bupivaca<strong>in</strong>e is effective both <strong>in</strong>tra- <strong>and</strong>postoperatively. The addition of morph<strong>in</strong>e to the LA<strong>in</strong>creased the efficacy with no <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> adverseeffects <strong>in</strong> one study (170).Paracetamol given alongside caudal block did notimprove analgesia <strong>in</strong> the first six postoperative hourscompared with a caudal block alone <strong>in</strong> one study(171). Overall, there are <strong>in</strong>sufficient data to evaluatethe use of supplementary analgesia <strong>in</strong> either the earlyor late postoperative period. In cl<strong>in</strong>ical practice, amulti-modal analgesic technique for this procedure issuggested, with regular supplementary analgesia given<strong>in</strong> the postoperative period.Analgesia Table 5.5.4 Hypospadias RepairAgentTechniqueDirectevidenceLA Dorsal n. block 1+LA Caudal epidural 1+LA Lumbar epidural 1+LA Sp<strong>in</strong>al 1)LA + neostigm<strong>in</strong>e a,b Caudal epidural 1+LA + opioid b Caudal epidural 1+LA + opioid Intrathecal 1)Opioid c 1+NSAID c 1+Paracetamol c 1+Indirectevidencea Note on caudal additives: not all additives have undergone rigoroussafety test<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> concerns regard<strong>in</strong>g potential toxiceffects have been expressed. See Section 6.3.b Small improvements <strong>in</strong> efficacy must be balanced aga<strong>in</strong>st<strong>in</strong>creased PONV.c As part of a multi-modal technique.5.5.5 OrchidopexyOrchidopexy usually <strong>in</strong>volves surgical exploration ofthe <strong>in</strong>gu<strong>in</strong>al region, dissection, <strong>and</strong> traction of thespermatic cord <strong>and</strong> scrotal <strong>in</strong>cision may also berequired. Orchidopexy is generally performed on aday-case basis. See sections 5.1 <strong>and</strong> 5.5.1 for the generalmanagement of postoperative pa<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> for a furtherdiscussion of sub-umbilical surgery.RecommendationCaudal block is effective <strong>in</strong> the early postoperative periodfor orchidopexy with low rates of complications <strong>and</strong>side effects: Grade A (172–174).EvidenceThere are few studies <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g analgesia for orchidopexyalone. <strong>Postoperative</strong> analgesic requirementsmay be greater than that required for <strong>in</strong>gu<strong>in</strong>al herniarepair (97).LA caudal block us<strong>in</strong>g 1 mlÆkg )1 of 0.125–0.25%bupivaca<strong>in</strong>e or 1–1.5 mlÆkg )1 of ropivaca<strong>in</strong>e 0.15–0.225% has shown good efficacy <strong>and</strong> low complicationrates (172–175). This is <strong>in</strong> agreement with large caseseries of this technique (104–106). It was associatedwith greater efficacy, less supplementary analgesic use<strong>and</strong> lower levels of stress hormones when comparedwith ilio<strong>in</strong>gu<strong>in</strong>al nerve block plus local <strong>in</strong>filtration(172,173). There was also no difference <strong>in</strong> time to micturition,motor block or nausea <strong>and</strong> vomit<strong>in</strong>g betweenthe two techniques (172). A higher volume of localanesthetic (1 mlÆkg )1 ) was associated with less response42 ª 2012 Blackwell Publish<strong>in</strong>g Ltd, Pediatric Anesthesia, 22 (Suppl. 1), 1–79
to cord traction, but not with improved postoperativeanalgesia (174).Neuraxial analgesic additives: the addition of ketam<strong>in</strong>e0.25–1 mgÆkg )1 as an adjunct to bupivaca<strong>in</strong>e<strong>in</strong>creased analgesic efficacy but was associated with‘short-lived psychomotor effects’ at higher doses (176).The addition of IV dexamethasone with ropivavca<strong>in</strong>ecaudal block was associated with <strong>in</strong>creased analgesicefficacy (177).Transverse abdom<strong>in</strong>al plane (TAP) block us<strong>in</strong>g pla<strong>in</strong>LA, as part of a multi-modal analgesic technique, hasdemonstrated perioperative analgesic efficacy with nocomplications <strong>in</strong> a small case series (178).Analgesia Table 5.5.5 OrchidopexyAgentTechniqueDirectevidenceLA Wound <strong>in</strong>filtration a 1+LA Ilio<strong>in</strong>gu<strong>in</strong>al block a 1+LA Caudal epidural 1+LA TAP block 3Opioid b 1+NSAID b 1+Paracetamol b 1+a Less effective than caudal block.b As part of a multi-modal technique.5.5.6 Ingu<strong>in</strong>al hernia repair (open)IndirectevidenceSurgical repair of <strong>in</strong>gu<strong>in</strong>al hernia is generally performedon a day-case basis. The follow<strong>in</strong>g refers to theconventional ‘open’ technique, rather than laparoscopicrepair that is becom<strong>in</strong>g more popular. See sections5.1 <strong>and</strong> 5.5.1 for the general management ofpostoperative pa<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> for a further discussion of subumbilicalsurgery.<strong>Good</strong> practice po<strong>in</strong>tThe use of an ultrasound-guided technique for theplacement of an ilio-<strong>in</strong>gu<strong>in</strong>al nerve block may decreasethe failure rate <strong>and</strong> improve analgesic efficacy.RecommendationsLA wound <strong>in</strong>filtration, ilio-<strong>in</strong>gu<strong>in</strong>al nerve block, paravertebralblock, or caudal analgesia are effective <strong>in</strong> theearly postoperative period: Grade A (179–184).EvidenceCaudal block was the most commonly studied techniquewith good efficacy <strong>and</strong> a low failure complication rate <strong>in</strong>all studies. This is <strong>in</strong> agreement with large case series ofthis technique (104–106). Bupivaca<strong>in</strong>e 0.25% was themost studied <strong>and</strong> compared LA, ropivaca<strong>in</strong>e 0.25% wasfound to be equivalent <strong>in</strong> one study (185). Anotherstudy compar<strong>in</strong>g different concentrations of bupivaca<strong>in</strong>ewith <strong>and</strong> without adjunctive opioid showed lowerefficacy for 0.125% bupivaca<strong>in</strong>e (186). In a study ofbupivaca<strong>in</strong>e 0.175% (+adrenal<strong>in</strong>e 1 : 10 000), therewas no difference <strong>in</strong> efficacy or side effects at volumes ofbetween 0.7 <strong>and</strong> 1.3 mlÆkg )1 (187).Neuraxial analgesic additives: With LA; midazolam,ketam<strong>in</strong>e, clonid<strong>in</strong>e, fentanyl, neostigm<strong>in</strong>e, adrenal<strong>in</strong>e,morph<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong> tramadol have all been studied asadjuncts to local anesthesia for caudal block. They allshow good efficacy, but evidence of overall benefit isequivocal as <strong>in</strong> most studies few patients required furtheranalgesia follow<strong>in</strong>g caudal block with pla<strong>in</strong> LA(166,175,181,188–195). In studies where no comparisonwas made with pla<strong>in</strong> LA: <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the dose of ketam<strong>in</strong>ealso <strong>in</strong>creased efficacy, but neuro-behavioral sideeffects were seen at higher doses (196). Increas<strong>in</strong>g clonid<strong>in</strong>edose from 1 to 2 lgÆkg )1 had limited or noeffects on efficacy, time to 1st analgesia was prolonged<strong>in</strong> one study, but not <strong>in</strong> another (188,197).Without LA: S (+) ketam<strong>in</strong>e without local anestheticwas equivalent to bupivaca<strong>in</strong>e + adrenal<strong>in</strong>emixture, <strong>and</strong> S (+) ketam<strong>in</strong>e + clonid<strong>in</strong>e mixtureshowed <strong>in</strong>creased efficacy over ketam<strong>in</strong>e alone(198,199). Another study compar<strong>in</strong>g caudal with<strong>in</strong>tramuscular S-ketam<strong>in</strong>e showed <strong>in</strong>creased efficacy <strong>in</strong>the caudal group (200). Tramadol without local anestheticshowed reduced efficacy compared with pla<strong>in</strong>bupivaca<strong>in</strong>e or a bupivaca<strong>in</strong>e + tramadol mixture(191).Placement of caudal block prior to surgery was alsoshown to have better efficacy <strong>in</strong> the postoperative periodthan placement at the end of surgery <strong>in</strong> one study(201).Comparison of paravertebral block with caudal LAor <strong>in</strong>traoperative opioid (fentanyl) showed <strong>in</strong>creasedpostoperative analgesic efficacy, patient satisfaction,<strong>and</strong> earlier hospital discharge with the paravertebralblock (184,202).Ilio<strong>in</strong>gu<strong>in</strong>al nerve block shows good efficacy <strong>and</strong>safety, although a preferred agent, dose, or volume hasnot been demonstrated, although Levobupivaca<strong>in</strong>econcentrations below 0.25% show decreased efficacy(182,203–205). High failure rates have been associatedª 2012 Blackwell Publish<strong>in</strong>g Ltd, Pediatric Anesthesia, 22 (Suppl. 1), 1–79 43
- Page 1 and 2: PediatricAnesthesiaVolume 22 Supple
- Page 3 and 4: doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2012.3838.
- Page 5 and 6: 1.6 Contact informationCorresponden
- Page 7 and 8: RecommendationsChildren’s self-re
- Page 9 and 10: Topical anesthetic preparations, fo
- Page 11 and 12: 2.7.6 Laparoscopic surgeryGood prac
- Page 13 and 14: In order to assess pain, effective
- Page 16 and 17: Postoperative painl NCCPC-PV (Non-C
- Page 18 and 19: 68 Broome ME, Richtsmeier A, Maikle
- Page 20 and 21: however, reductions in the response
- Page 22 and 23: increased success rate (i.e., less
- Page 24 and 25: Newer preparations such as liposoma
- Page 26 and 27: Good practice pointLubricant contai
- Page 28 and 29: most effective. There are a number
- Page 30 and 31: 12 Bellieni C, Bagnoli F, Perrone S
- Page 32 and 33: venipuncture pain in a pediatric em
- Page 34 and 35: 172 van Twillert B, Bremer M, Faber
- Page 36 and 37: necessary to ensure that the patien
- Page 38 and 39: when compared with LA alone and sal
- Page 40 and 41: Peribulbar block improves early ana
- Page 42 and 43: Analgesia Table 5.5.1 Sub-umbilical
- Page 46 and 47: with using landmark techniques (205
- Page 48 and 49: Good practice pointWound infiltrati
- Page 50 and 51: Analgesia Table 5.6.4 Urological Su
- Page 52 and 53: (298). Ketorolac did not influence
- Page 54 and 55: well as the epidural technique for
- Page 56 and 57: Good practice pointA multi-modal an
- Page 58 and 59: 14 Grainger J, Saravanappa N. Local
- Page 60 and 61: day-stay unit. Int J Paediatr Dent
- Page 62 and 63: tinuous epidural infusion in childr
- Page 64 and 65: 245 Morton NS, O’Brien K. Analges
- Page 66 and 67: 321 Taenzer AH, Clark C, Taenzer AH
- Page 68 and 69: Section 6.0AnalgesiaContents6.1 Ana
- Page 70 and 71: enhance systemic absorption. Lidoca
- Page 73 and 74: undergoes hepatic biotransformation
- Page 75 and 76: tein binding are reduced and the ha
- Page 77 and 78: a low-dose infusion but the child m
- Page 79 and 80: Table 6.6.1 Paracetamol dosing guid
- Page 81: steps that health care professional