student feedback and leadership - Office for Learning and Teaching
student feedback and leadership - Office for Learning and Teaching
student feedback and leadership - Office for Learning and Teaching
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Student Feedback & LeadershipIn Semester 2, the <strong>feedback</strong> <strong>for</strong>um size was reduced, in some cases toa limit of 50 <strong>student</strong>s, but mostly to around 60 to 80 <strong>student</strong>s in an attemptto enhance <strong>student</strong> interaction <strong>and</strong> satisfy the level of individual attentiondesired by <strong>student</strong>s.ECON1020 – Prices <strong>and</strong> MarketsFirst Semester 2008:Based on <strong>student</strong> <strong>feedback</strong> in relation to course content, two key topicswere redeveloped. However, the main focus was on rewriting PracticeTest 2, giving a broader coverage of the material <strong>and</strong> providing more detailedcomments on the answers. Some modifications were also made to the lecturedemonstration lecture material. Comments on common errors made on thetest papers (<strong>for</strong> each of Test 1 <strong>and</strong> Test 2) were placed in a separate folderentitled “Test Feedback” rather than in the general Test folders. This wasto make the <strong>feedback</strong> more visible to <strong>student</strong>s to encourage them to readthe in<strong>for</strong>mation.In addition, to increase the opportunities <strong>for</strong> <strong>student</strong>/staff interaction <strong>and</strong><strong>feedback</strong>, the size of the demonstration lectures was reduced from 120<strong>student</strong>s to a maximum of 80 <strong>student</strong>s <strong>and</strong> the lecture group of 600 wassplit into two groups of 300 – although, as the second lecture group followeddirectly after the first, there was some migration from the 3.30pm groupto the 1.30pm group, as that was the preferred time.Outline the stages of action taken <strong>and</strong> how it was reflected in the actionresearch cycle process ( Plan, Act, Observe, Reflect)This is detailed in the Project Description in sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4.How have <strong>student</strong>s been involved in the project?This is also detailed in the Project Description. In brief, <strong>student</strong>s providedthe <strong>feedback</strong> that was the basis <strong>for</strong> the development of the various coursedevelopment initiatives. Existing <strong>feedback</strong> in the <strong>for</strong>m of CES results, SESresults <strong>and</strong> SSCC meeting minutes was analysed <strong>and</strong> specific <strong>feedback</strong>was generated <strong>for</strong> this project through <strong>student</strong> focus groups.Given that the initiatives were developed to address <strong>student</strong> <strong>feedback</strong>,<strong>student</strong>s obviously had the opportunity to experience the various coursedevelopments <strong>and</strong> to provide <strong>feedback</strong> which was then used to in<strong>for</strong>mthe future direction.Page 100