13.07.2015 Views

student feedback and leadership - Office for Learning and Teaching

student feedback and leadership - Office for Learning and Teaching

student feedback and leadership - Office for Learning and Teaching

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Student Feedback & LeadershipIn Semester 2, the <strong>feedback</strong> <strong>for</strong>um size was reduced, in some cases toa limit of 50 <strong>student</strong>s, but mostly to around 60 to 80 <strong>student</strong>s in an attemptto enhance <strong>student</strong> interaction <strong>and</strong> satisfy the level of individual attentiondesired by <strong>student</strong>s.ECON1020 – Prices <strong>and</strong> MarketsFirst Semester 2008:Based on <strong>student</strong> <strong>feedback</strong> in relation to course content, two key topicswere redeveloped. However, the main focus was on rewriting PracticeTest 2, giving a broader coverage of the material <strong>and</strong> providing more detailedcomments on the answers. Some modifications were also made to the lecturedemonstration lecture material. Comments on common errors made on thetest papers (<strong>for</strong> each of Test 1 <strong>and</strong> Test 2) were placed in a separate folderentitled “Test Feedback” rather than in the general Test folders. This wasto make the <strong>feedback</strong> more visible to <strong>student</strong>s to encourage them to readthe in<strong>for</strong>mation.In addition, to increase the opportunities <strong>for</strong> <strong>student</strong>/staff interaction <strong>and</strong><strong>feedback</strong>, the size of the demonstration lectures was reduced from 120<strong>student</strong>s to a maximum of 80 <strong>student</strong>s <strong>and</strong> the lecture group of 600 wassplit into two groups of 300 – although, as the second lecture group followeddirectly after the first, there was some migration from the 3.30pm groupto the 1.30pm group, as that was the preferred time.Outline the stages of action taken <strong>and</strong> how it was reflected in the actionresearch cycle process ( Plan, Act, Observe, Reflect)This is detailed in the Project Description in sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4.How have <strong>student</strong>s been involved in the project?This is also detailed in the Project Description. In brief, <strong>student</strong>s providedthe <strong>feedback</strong> that was the basis <strong>for</strong> the development of the various coursedevelopment initiatives. Existing <strong>feedback</strong> in the <strong>for</strong>m of CES results, SESresults <strong>and</strong> SSCC meeting minutes was analysed <strong>and</strong> specific <strong>feedback</strong>was generated <strong>for</strong> this project through <strong>student</strong> focus groups.Given that the initiatives were developed to address <strong>student</strong> <strong>feedback</strong>,<strong>student</strong>s obviously had the opportunity to experience the various coursedevelopments <strong>and</strong> to provide <strong>feedback</strong> which was then used to in<strong>for</strong>mthe future direction.Page 100

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!