student feedback and leadership - Office for Learning and Teaching
student feedback and leadership - Office for Learning and Teaching
student feedback and leadership - Office for Learning and Teaching
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Student Feedback & Leadership––The Project Reference Group played an active <strong>and</strong> invaluable role fromwhich <strong>feedback</strong> on the project was obtained on a regular basis as theproject progressed through action research cycles. Reference groupmembers were particularly helpful in identifying the sustainability <strong>and</strong>applicability of reflection on, <strong>and</strong> outcomes from, the project acrossRMIT <strong>and</strong> the higher education sector. This included suggestions of howthe Dissemination process could be designed to reach a broad audience.The unique nature of the Reference group engagement in the projectwas demonstrated by the attendance of external members at a numberof Plenary sessions <strong>and</strong> the assistance provided by one member in theconceptualisation of the Evaluation process.––The involvement of <strong>student</strong>s was particularly important in the ARTs wherefocus groups were used to exp<strong>and</strong> on <strong>student</strong> <strong>feedback</strong> recorded in theCES. In addition the involvement of <strong>student</strong>s in a Plenary session enabledthe viewpoint of <strong>student</strong>s to be discussed across a vertical slice of theuniversity <strong>leadership</strong>.2.4.2 Project Management2.4.2.1 Role of the Manager <strong>and</strong> Project <strong>Office</strong>rA key to the success of the project was effective project management.A Project <strong>Office</strong>r was employed (0.5) with the role of ensuring that strategicplanning <strong>and</strong> effective implementation of all aspects of the project took place.This also provided a single point of contact <strong>for</strong> queries from participantsinvolved in the project. Implementation was guided in principle by a phasedaction implementation plan which was supported by a yearly scheduledplan of meetings <strong>and</strong> project events.2.4.2.2 Stewardship of the ProjectStrategic planning of the project was the joint responsibility of the ProjectLeader DVC (Academic), the Project Manager ( Director of <strong>Learning</strong> & <strong>Teaching</strong>Unit) <strong>and</strong> the Project <strong>Office</strong>r.Regular meetings of the ART Facilitators in the first year of the project ensuredthat assistance <strong>for</strong> the ART Teams in identifying the broader pedagogical<strong>and</strong> <strong>leadership</strong> issues was identified. The inclusion of ART Leaders in thesemeetings from the second half of the first year of the project improved thecommunication between ARTs.The multi-level aspect of the Project Team provided a unique integratingdiscussion space <strong>and</strong> became an integral part of the action researchapproach that underpinned the project.Page 26