Study of Hygienic practices of street food vendors in ... - Shiats.edu.in

More documents

Recommendations

Info

B. Nalinee Kanth Reddy, G. Roopa Lavanya and Ashok Kumar S. M.Table 4. Direct and indirect effects of component characters on with seed yield at phenotypic and genotypiclevels in mungbeanCharacters Level Days to 50% Days to Plant Primary Clusters/ Pods/ Pods/ Seeds/ Pod 100-seed SeedFlowering maturity height branches/ plant cluster plant pod length weight yield/plant plantDays to 50% P 0.130 0.107 0.067 0.039 -0.014 -0.040 -0.038 -0.029 -0.044 -0.012 -0.33Flowering G -0.157 -0.148 -0.138 -0.062 0.002 0.059 0.044 0.091 0.088 0.009 -0.323Days to P -0.064 -0.077 -0.040 -0.019 -0.001 0.027 0.014 0.000 0.018 0.016 -0.25maturity G 0.236 0.251 0.226 0.149 0.041 -0.112 -0.049 -0.118 -0.126 -0.059 -0.321Plant height P 0.017 0.016 0.033 0.004 -0.006 -0.008 -0.011 0.004 -0.006 0.008 -0.22G -0.056 -0.057 -0.063 -0.032 0.031 0.051 0.035 -0.030 0.015 -0.020 -0.411Primary P 0.004 0.004 0.002 0.0163 -0.003 -0.006 -0.004 0.001 -0.001 -0.004 -0.35branches/plant G -0.044 -0.065 -0.056 -0.110 0.020 0.050 0.032 0.034 0.051 0.049 -0.511Clusters/ plant P 0.001 -0.000 0.003 0.003 -0.017 -0.007 -0.011 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.58G 0.001 -0.019 0.057 0.0222 -0.117 -0.074 -0.094 0.057 0.023 0.042 0.713Pods/ cluster P 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.001 -0.001 -0.003 -0.002 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.67G 0.009 0.010 0.019 0.010 -0.015 -0.023 -0.022 0.012 0.015 0.005 0.927Pods/ plant P -0.332 -0.208 -0.402 -0.311 0.769 0.847 1.135 -0.281 -0.341 -0.404 0.86G -0/314 -0.218 -0.612 -0.328 0.894 1.042 1.109 -0.511 -0.533 -0.442 0.914Seeds/ pod P -0.036 -0.000 0.020 0.012 -0.046 -0.039 -0.039 0.160 0.061 0.034 -0.03G -0.013 -0.010 0.010 -0.007 -0.011 -0.011 -0.010 0.022 0.013 0.010 -0.287Pod length P -0.014 -0.010 -0.007 -0.003 -0.008 -0.013 -0.012 0.016 0.042 0.008 -0.18G 0.037 0.034 0.016 0.031 0.013 0.042 0.032 -0.041 -0.067 -0.019 -0.399100-seed P -0.039 -0.087 0.100 0.100 -0.090 -0.081 -0.144 0.087 0.079 0.406 0.05weight G -0.024 -0.097 0.129 -0.183 -0.147 -0.096 -0.163 0.195 0.120 0.409 -0.01454
The Allahabad Farmer Vol. LXVIII, January - 2013 No. 2The information derived from the correlation studies indicates only mutual associationamong the characters, whereas path coefficient analysis helps in understanding themagnitude of direct and indirect contribution of component characters on seed yield. Thecharacters namely number of pods/ plant depicted maximum direct effect on seed yieldboth at genotypic and phenotypic levels followed by number of seeds/ pod, pod lengthand 100-seed weight (Table 4). These results are in accordance with the findings ofVenkateswarulu (2001) and Tabasum et al. (2010).CONCLUSIONFrom the present study, it would be suggested that, considerable amount of variationexists among the genotypes of mungbean at Allahabad climatic conditions. The characters,number of pods/ plant, 100-seed weight, number of seeds/ pod and pod length are themajor yield contributing characters and will help in improving seed yield. Therefore, dueemphasis should be given to these characters in selection programme to develop desirablegenotypes of mungbean.REFERENCESAl-Jibouri, H. A.; Miller, P. A. and Robinson, H. F. (1958). Genotypic andenvironmental variances and covariances in an upland cotton cross ofinterspecific origin. Agron. J., 50: 633-637.Burton, G. W. (1952). Quantitative inheritance in grasses. Proceedings of6 th International Grassland Congress, 1: 277-283.Dewey, D. R and Lu, K. H. (1959). A correlation and path coefficient analysis ofcomponents of crested wheat grass seed production. Agron. J., 51: 515-518.Johnson, H. W.; Robinson, H. F. and Comstock, R. E. (1955). Genotypic andphenotypic correlations in soybean and their implications in selection. Agron. J.,74: 477-483.Kaveri, S. B., Salimath, P. M. and Ravi Kumar, R. L. (2007). Genetic studies andassociation analysis in greengram. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 20(4): 843-844.Lavanya, G. R. and Singh, Y. (2005). Assessment of genetic variability and characterassociation mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). The Allahabad Farmer,59(2): 70-75.55
Page 1 and 2:
The Allahabad Farmer Vol. LXVIII, J
Page 3 and 4: The Allahabad Farmer Vol. LXVIII, J
Page 31 and 32: Verma Rekha and Parvez RaziaINTRODU
Page 33 and 34: Verma Rekha and Parvez RaziaThe ves
Page 35 and 36: Verma Rekha and Parvez RaziaThe poo
Page 53: The Allahabad Farmer Vol. LXVIII, J
Page 81 and 82: Neetesh Gupta, S. Saravanan and V.
Page 87 and 88: Payal Sao, J.P.Collis, S. Saravanan
Page 89 and 90: Payal Sao, J.P.Collis, S. Saravanan
Page 91 and 92: Aarti Shrivas, Suryendra Singh, San
Page 97 and 98: Pradeep Kumar, S.S. Sengarinvolves
Page 99 and 100: Pradeep Kumar, S.S. SengarREFERENCE
Page 101 and 102: Avantika Pandey, Natasha Nageswaran
Page 103 and 104: Avantika Pandey, Natasha Nageswaran
Page 105 and 106:
Avantika Pandey, Natasha Nageswaran
Page 107 and 108:
Aradhana Irene Charan, Nishant Kuma
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Apala Gupta, Prema Devi and V.P. Sa
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Sudarshan Subedi, Neena Gupta, Vari
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133:
show all

Study of Hygienic practices of street food vendors in ... - Shiats.edu.in

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?