A Practical Approach, Second Edition=Ronald D. Ho.pdf

418 DEVELOPMENTAL REPRODUCTIVE TOXICOLOGY: A PRACTICAL APPROACH, SECOND EDITION34. Lehman, A.J., Laug, E.P., Woodard, G., Draize, J.H., Fitzhugh, O.G., and Nelson, A.A., Procedures forthe appraisal of the toxicity of chemicals in foods, Food Drug Cosmetic Law Quarterly, September, 1949.35. Mauer, I.,Ed., Appraisal of the Safety of Chemicals in Foods, Drugs and Cosmetics, The Associationof Food and Drug Officials of the United States, Washington, D.C., 1959.36. Hendrickx, A.G. and Binkerd, P.E., Nonhuman primates and teratological research, J. Med. Primatol.,19, 81, 1990.37. Buelke-Sam, J., Kimmel, C.A., Adams, J., Nelson, C.J., Vorhees, C.V., Wright, D.C., Omer, V.St.,Korol, B.A., Butcher, R.E., Geyer, M.A., Holson, J.F., Kutscher, C.L., and Wayner, M.J., Collaborativebehavioral teratology study: results, Neurotoxicol. Teratol., 7, 591, 1985.38. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs. Proposed guidelines for registeringpesticides in the United States; Hazard evaluation: Humans and domestic animals, Fed. Regist.,43, 37336, 1978.39. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Guidelines for developmental toxicity risk assessment; notice,Fed Regist., 56, 63798, 1991.40. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Reproductive toxicity risk assessment guidelines; notice, Fed.Regist., 61, 56274, 1996.41. Eaton, D.L. and Klaassen, C.D., Principles of toxicology, in Casarett & Doull’s Toxicology: The BasicScience of Poisons, 6th ed., Klaassen, C.D., Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 2001, p. 11.42. vom Saal, F.S., Timms, B.G., Montano, M.M., Palanza, P., Thayer, K.A., Nagel, S.C., Dhar, M.D.,Ganjam, V.K., Parmigiani, S., and Welshons, W.V., Prostate enlargement in mice due to fetal exposureto low doses of estradiol or diethylstilbestrol and opposite effects at high doses, Proc. Natl. Acad.Sci. USA, 94, 2056, 1997.43. Shuey, D.L., Lau, C., Logsdon, T.R., Zucker, R.M., Elstein, K.H., Narotsky, M.G., Setxer, R.W.,Kavlock, R.J., and Rogers, J.M., Biologically-based dose-response modeling in developmental toxicology:biochemical and cellular sequelae of 5-fluorouracil exposure in the developing rat, Toxicol.Appl Pharmacol., 126, 129, 1994.44. Young, J.F. and Holson, J.F., Utility of pharmacokinetics in designing toxicological protocols andimproving interspecies extrapolation, J. Environ. Pathol. Toxicol., 2, 169, 1978.45. Scott, W.J. Jr., Collins, M.D., and Nau, H., Pharmacokinetic determinants of embryotoxicity in ratsassociated with organic acids, Environ. Health Perspect., 102(Suppl. 11), 97, 1994.46. Faustman, E.M., Allen, B.C., Kavlock, R.J., and Kimmel, C.A., Dose-response assessment for developmentaltoxicity. I. Characterization of database and determination of no observed adverse effectlevels, Fundam. Appl. Toxicol., 23, 478, 1994.47. Hood, R.D., Effects of sodium arsenite on fetal development, Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 7, 216,1972.48. DeSesso, J.M., Jacobson, C.F., Scialli, A.R., Farr, C.H., and Holson, J.F., An assessment of thedevelopmental toxicity of inorganic arsenic, Reprod. Toxicol., 12, 385, 1998.49. Holson, J.F., Stump, D.G., Clevidence, K.J., Knapp, J.F., and Farr, C.H., Evaluation of the prenataldevelopmental toxicity of orally administered arsenic trioxide in rats, Food Chem. Toxicol., 38, 459,2000.50. Stump, D.G., Holson, J.F., Fleeman, T.L., Nemec, M.D., and Farr, C.H., Comparative effects of singleintraperitoneal or oral doses of sodium arsenate or arsenic trioxide during in utero development,Teratology, 60, 283, 1999.51. National Academy of Sciences, Sample size determination, in Guidelines for the Care and Use ofMammals in Neuroscience and Behavioral Research, National Academies Press, Washington, DC,2003, p. 176, Appendix A.52. Nelson, C.J. and Holson, J.F., Statistical analysis of teratologic data: problems and advancements, J.Environ. Pathol. Toxicol., 2, 187, 1978.53. Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J.H., Principles and Procedures of Statistics, A Biometrical Approach, 2nded., McGraw, New York, 1980, pp. 504-506.54. Dunnett, C.W., New tables for multiple comparisons with a control, Biometrics, 20, 482, 1964.55. Kruskal, W.H. and Wallis, W.A., Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis, J. Am. StatisticalAssoc., 47, 583, 1952.56. Holson, J.F., Scott, W.J., Gaylor, D.W., and Wilson, J.G., Reduced interlitter variability in rats resultingfrom a restricted mating period, and reassessment of the “litter effect”, Teratology, 14, 135, 1976.© 2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC