A Practical Approach, Second Edition=Ronald D. Ho.pdf

758 DEVELOPMENTAL REPRODUCTIVE TOXICOLOGY: A PRACTICAL APPROACH, SECOND EDITION75. Peters, P.W.J., Double staining of fetal skeletons for cartilage and bone, in Methods in Prenatal Toxicology,Neubert, D., Merker, W.G., and Kwasigroch, T.E., Eds., Georg Thieme Publ., Stuttgart, 1977, p.153.76. Whitaker, J. and Dix, K.M., Double staining technique for rat foetus skeletons in teratological studies,Lab. Animals, 13:309, 1979.77. Webb G.N. and Byrd R.A., Simultaneous differential staining of cartilage and bone in rodent fetuses: analcian blue and alizarin red S procedure without glacial acetic acid, Biotech Histochem., 69:181, 1994.78. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Health Effects Test Guidelines: Combined Repeated DoseToxicity with the Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test, Office of Prevention, Pesticidesand Toxic Substances (OPPTS) 870.3650, 2000.79. Johnson, E.M., The scientific basis for multigeneration safety evaluation, J. Am. Coll. Toxicol., 5(4),197, 1986.80. Christian, M.S., A critical review of multigeneration studies, J. Am. Coll. Toxicol., 5(2), 161, 1986.81. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Good Laboratory Practice Regulations, Final Rule 21, Code ofFederal Regulations, Part 58.82. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Laboratory Practice in the Testing of Chemicals,Final Rule of the OCED Expert Group on Laboratory Practices [C(81) 3.0 (Final), Annex 2], 1981.83. Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF), Good Laboratory Practice Regulations,59 Noshan No. 3850, 1984.84. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (EPA-FIFRA), Good Laboratory Practice Standards, Final Rule, 40 CFR Part 160.85. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Toxic Substances Control Act, Good Laboratory PracticeStandards, Final Rule, 40 CFR Part 792.86. Christian, M.S., The use of CASA systems for reproductive toxicology (CRYO Resources Ltd. CellSoftSeries 4000 Tox. System vs the Hamilton Thorne HTM-IVOS), presented at the 82nd Meeting of theMid-Atlantic Reproduction and Teratology Association, Lambertville, PA, October 14–15, 1993.87. Christian, M.S., Compliance with tripartite guideline for male reproductive performance, presentedat the Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association Drug Safety Subsection Annual Meeting, Austin,TX, October 17–20, 1993c.88. Plowchalk, D.R. and Mattison, D.R., Phosphoramide mustard is responsible for the ovarian toxicityof cyclophosphamide, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 107, 472, 1991.89. Smith, B.J., Plowchalk, D.R., Sipes, I.G., and Mattison, D.R., Comparison of random and serialsections in assessment of ovarian toxicity, Reprod. Toxicol., 5, 379, 1991.90. Plowchalk, D.R., Smith, B.J., and Mattison, D.R., Assessment of toxicity to the ovary using folliclequantitation and morphometrics, in Methods In Toxicology, Vol. 3B, Female Reproductive Toxicology,Heindel, J.J. and Chapin, R.E., Eds., Academic Press, San Diego, 1993, p. 57.91. Christian, M.S. and Brown W.R., Control primordial follicle counts in multigeneration studies in CRLSprague-Dawley (“Gold Standard”) rats, The Toxicologist, 66(1S), A1140, 2002.92. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Proposed Testing Guidelines, Notice of Availability andRequest for Comments, 61 FR 31522, 1996c.93. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Overview and Summary of Changes Made in the Harmonizationof OPPTS 870 Toxicology Guidelines with OECD Guidelines, available at http://www.epa.gov/docs/OPPTS_Harmonized/870_Health_Effects_Test_Guidelines/Summary/summchge.htm (verified18 June 2002).94. Palmer, A.K. and Ulbrich, B.C., The cult of culling, Fund. Applied Toxicol., 38, 7, 1997.95. Diener, R.M., Timing and utility of behavioral studies in developmental toxicology, in Proceedingsof the First International Conference on Harmonisation, D’Arcy P.F. and Harron, D.W.G., Eds., TheQueen’s University of Belfast, Antrim, Northern Ireland,, 1993, p. 273.96. Lochry, E.A. and Christian, M.S., Behavioral evaluations in reproductive safety assessments, J. Am.Coll. Toxicol., 10(5), 585, 1991.97. Lewis, E.M., Barnett Jr., J.F., Freshwater, L., Hoberman, A.M., and Christian, M.S., Sexual maturationdata for Crl Sprague-Dawley rats: criteria and confounding factors, Drug Chem. Toxicol., 2002.98. Endocrine Disruptor Screening and Testing Advisory Committee, EDSTAC final report, available athttp:// http://www.epa.gov/scipoly/oscpendo/history/finalrpt.htm (verified 11 June 2002).© 2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC