04.12.2012 Views

Synthesis and Comparison of the Reactivity of Allyl Fluorides and ...

Synthesis and Comparison of the Reactivity of Allyl Fluorides and ...

Synthesis and Comparison of the Reactivity of Allyl Fluorides and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

99<br />

Chapter Four<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>r reactions were conducted with (142a) in order to syn<strong>the</strong>sise <strong>the</strong> methylfluorinated<br />

(R) <strong>and</strong> (S) analogues <strong>of</strong> ibupr<strong>of</strong>en (Figure 4.2). Currently racemic ibupr<strong>of</strong>en is sold<br />

worldwide, as it converts from <strong>the</strong> (R) to <strong>the</strong> (S) isomer after ingestion. The (S) isomer is<br />

called dexibupr<strong>of</strong>en <strong>and</strong> has very different pharmacological properties to <strong>the</strong> racemic<br />

version. Therefore several groups have syn<strong>the</strong>sised chiral derivatives in order to gain<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r insight into this system. [19-23] Here, (142a) was converted to (S)- methyl fluorinated<br />

ibupr<strong>of</strong>en (143) in a similar method to <strong>the</strong> conventional syn<strong>the</strong>sis <strong>of</strong> ibupr<strong>of</strong>en. [24] Firstly,<br />

ozonolysis <strong>of</strong> (142a) (R <strong>and</strong> S) was conducted in a methanol/DCM (3:1) mixture at – 78 ºC<br />

for just over 3 hours. Subsequently, reduction with NaBH4 afforded <strong>the</strong><br />

mon<strong>of</strong>luoromethylated alcohols in excellent yields <strong>and</strong> enantioselectivities ((R) = 85 %, 91<br />

% ee, (S) = 87 %, 91 % ee). The sulfonyl group was removed next by reaction with<br />

activated magnesium in methanol at 0 ºC for 2 hours, followed by oxidation with Jones<br />

reagent in acetone at room temperature for 1 hour, to afford <strong>the</strong> desired product (143) in<br />

good yields with high enantioselectivity, ((R) = 73 %, 91 % ee, (S) = 79 %, 91 % ee).<br />

4.2 Results <strong>and</strong> Discussion<br />

Figure 4.2 (S)-ibupr<strong>of</strong>en <strong>and</strong> (S)-methyl fluorinated ibupr<strong>of</strong>en<br />

One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> key objectives <strong>of</strong> this work was to prepare allylic fluorides by reaction <strong>of</strong> Pd-<br />

allyl species with fluoride ion. Previously, <strong>the</strong>re has only been one, unsuccessful report <strong>of</strong><br />

an attempt to achieve this transformation by Togni et al. [25] whereby, initially catalytic<br />

fluorination was attempted with 1,3-diphenylallyl ethyl carbonate, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> catalyst was<br />

generated in situ from Pd(dba)2 <strong>and</strong> phosphanyl-ferrocenyl pyrazole (Scheme 4.4). The<br />

sources <strong>of</strong> nucleophilic fluoride tested were TBAT (NBu4[SiF2Ph3]) [26] <strong>and</strong> Me4NF. [27] Both<br />

are soluble in aprotic organic solvents, thus minimizing any reduction in <strong>the</strong> nucleophilicity<br />

<strong>of</strong> fluoride, which can occur by solvation in protic media or in <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> trace amounts<br />

<strong>of</strong> water. [28] However, nucleophilic attack <strong>of</strong> fluoride on <strong>the</strong> allyl component <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

liberation <strong>of</strong> an allyl fluoride was never observed. Attempting <strong>the</strong> reaction with a<br />

stoichiometric amount <strong>of</strong> palladium was also unsuccessful.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!