04.12.2012 Views

Synthesis and Comparison of the Reactivity of Allyl Fluorides and ...

Synthesis and Comparison of the Reactivity of Allyl Fluorides and ...

Synthesis and Comparison of the Reactivity of Allyl Fluorides and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

159<br />

Chapter Six<br />

drying under high vacuum, <strong>the</strong> flask was cooled <strong>and</strong> filled with nitrogen. The funnel was<br />

charged with 4-(trifluoromethyl)benzoyl chloride (3.06 g, 2.17 cm 3 , 14.69 mmol) <strong>and</strong><br />

pyridine (1.3 cm 3 ). The reaction flask was charged with (±)3-butene-1,2-diol (1.05 g, 1 cm 3 ,<br />

11.88 mmol) <strong>and</strong> pyridine (5 cm 3 ). The reaction flask was cooled to -35 ºC (isopropanol:<br />

dry ice mixture). The 4-(trifluoromethyl)benzoyl chloride solution was <strong>the</strong>n dropped into<br />

<strong>the</strong> cooled reaction flask, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> reaction mixture was stirred for 17 h. After which <strong>the</strong><br />

reaction mixture was poured into water <strong>and</strong> extracted with DCM. The extracts were <strong>the</strong>n<br />

washed with 2M HCl <strong>and</strong> NaHCO3 solution, after which it was dried over Na2SO4, <strong>and</strong><br />

concentrated in vacuo. Purification by chromatography [chlor<strong>of</strong>orm: hexane (80:20)]<br />

afforded <strong>the</strong> product as a white solid (2.03 g, 66 %). δH 2.34-2.41 (1H, bs, OH), 4.25 (1H,<br />

dd, 2 JHH = 11.3 Hz, 3 JHH = 7.0 Hz, Hd), 4.35 (1H, dd, 2 JHH = 11.3 Hz, 3 JHH = 3.5 Hz, He),<br />

4.44-4.49 (1H, m, CHOH), 5.20 (1H, ap.dt, 3 JHH = 10.6 Hz, 2 JHH = 4 JHH = 1.6 Hz, Hb), 5.36<br />

(1H, ap.dt, 3 JHH = 17.2 Hz, 2 JHH = 4 JHH = 1.6 Hz, Ha), 5.86 (1H, ddd, 3 JHH = 17.2 Hz, 3 JHH =<br />

10.6 Hz, 3 JHH = 5.9 Hz, Hc), 7.61 (2H, tm, 3 JHH = 8.2 Hz, ArH-3), 8.07 (2H, dm, 3 JHH = 8.2<br />

Hz, ArH-2); δC 68.6 (OCH2), 71.0 (CHOH), 117.4 (CHCH2), 123.6 (q, 1 JCF = 272.9 Hz,<br />

ArCF3), 125.5 (ArCH-3), 130.1 (ArCH-2), 133.0 (ArC-1), 134.7 (q, 2 JCF = 32.7 Hz, ArC-4),<br />

136.1 (CHCH2), 165.5 (C=O); δF – 63.1 (3F, s, CF3). m/z (FAB + ) 261 ([MH] + , 32 %) 123<br />

([M-OCH2CHOHCH= CH2] + , 100 %). HRMS (FAB) 261.07357 (C12H12O3F3 requires<br />

261.07355).<br />

6.2.34 Preparation <strong>of</strong> ((2-chlorobut-3-enyloxy)methyl)benzene (106)<br />

The novel compound was prepared following <strong>the</strong><br />

method outlined by Munyemana et al. [11] A 100 cm 3 ,<br />

three-necked round-bottom flask was equipped with a<br />

magnetic stirring bar <strong>and</strong> Rotaflo tap <strong>and</strong> attached to a<br />

Schlenk line. After flame-drying under high vacuum, <strong>the</strong> flask was cooled <strong>and</strong> filled with<br />

nitrogen. The reaction flask was <strong>the</strong>n charged with 1-(benzyloxy)but-3-en-2-ol (0.37 g, 2.07<br />

mmol) <strong>and</strong> anhydrous DCM (7 cm 3 ). The flask was <strong>the</strong>n cooled to 0 ºC using an ice bath.<br />

Once cooled tetramethyl-�-chloroenamine was added (0.28 g, 0.28 cm 3 , 2.07 mmol) via<br />

syringe. The reaction mixture was <strong>the</strong>n stirred at room temperature for 3 h. After which<br />

purification by chromatography [DCM/cyclohexane (50/50)] afforded <strong>the</strong> product as an oil<br />

(0.21 g, 52 %). Elemental analysis: Found: C, 67.07; H, 6.55. Calc. for C11H13OCl: C,<br />

67.18; H, 6.66 %. δH 3.58 (1H, dd, 2 JHH = 11.3 Hz, 3 JHH = 6.3 Hz, Hd), 3.61 (1H, dd, 2 JHH =<br />

11.3 Hz, 3 JHH = 6.7 Hz, He), 4.41-4.46 (1H, m, CHCl), 4.53 (2H, AB, 2 JAB = 12.1 Hz,<br />

CHAHBAr), 5.18 (1H, ap.dt, 3 JHH = 10.2 Hz, 2 JHH = 4 JHH = 0.8 Hz, Hb), 5.32 (1H, ap.dt, 3 JHH

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!