04.12.2012 Views

Synthesis and Comparison of the Reactivity of Allyl Fluorides and ...

Synthesis and Comparison of the Reactivity of Allyl Fluorides and ...

Synthesis and Comparison of the Reactivity of Allyl Fluorides and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

157<br />

Chapter Six<br />

1 JCF = 253.5 Hz, ArCF); δF –105.2 (1F, s, CF). m/z (EI + ) 210 ([M] + , 4 %) 123 ([M-<br />

OCH2CHOHCH=CH2] + , 100 %). HRMS (EI) 210.06895 (C11H11O3F requires 210.06895).<br />

6.2.31 Preparation <strong>of</strong> 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl 3-fluorobenzoate (102)<br />

The novel compound was prepared following <strong>the</strong><br />

method outlined by Ziegler et al. [10] A 100 cm 3 , three-<br />

necked round-bottom flask was equipped with a<br />

magnetic stirring bar, pressure equalising dropping<br />

funnel <strong>and</strong> Rotaflo tap <strong>and</strong> attached to a Schlenk line.<br />

After flame-drying under high vacuum, <strong>the</strong> flask was cooled <strong>and</strong> filled with nitrogen. The<br />

funnel was charged with 3-fluorobenzoyl chloride (2.33 g, 1.79 cm 3 , 14.69 mmol) <strong>and</strong><br />

pyridine (1.3 cm 3 ). The reaction flask was charged with (±)3-butene-1,2-diol (1.05 g, 1 cm 3 ,<br />

11.88 mmol) <strong>and</strong> pyridine (5 cm 3 ). The reaction flask was cooled to -35 ºC (isopropanol:<br />

dry ice mixture). The 3-fluorobenzoyl chloride solution was <strong>the</strong>n dropped into <strong>the</strong> cooled<br />

reaction flask, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> reaction mixture was stirred for 17 h. After which <strong>the</strong> reaction<br />

mixture was poured into water <strong>and</strong> extracted with DCM. The extracts were <strong>the</strong>n washed<br />

with 2M HCl <strong>and</strong> NaHCO3 solution, after which it was dried over Na2SO4, <strong>and</strong> concentrated<br />

in vacuo. Purification by chromatography [chlor<strong>of</strong>orm: hexane (80:20)] afforded <strong>the</strong><br />

product as a white solid (1.05 g, 42 %). δH 2.08-2.11 (1H, bs, OH), 4.23 (1H, dd, 2 JHH = 11.3<br />

Hz, 3 JHH = 7.0 Hz, Hd), 4.36 (1H, dd, 2 JHH = 11.3 Hz, 3 JHH = 3.5 Hz, He), 4.44-4.50 (1H, m,<br />

CHOH), 5.23 (1H, ap.dt, 3 JHH = 10.6 Hz, 2 JHH = 4 JHH = 1.6 Hz, Hb), 5.38 (1H, ap.dt, 3 JHH =<br />

17.2 Hz, 2 JHH = 4 JHH = 1.6 Hz, Ha), 5.88 (1H, ddd, 3 JHH = 17.2 Hz, 3 JHH = 10.6 Hz, 3 JHH =<br />

5.9 Hz, Hc), 7.21 (1H, ap.tdd, 3 JHH = 3 JHF = 8.2 Hz, 4 JHH = 2.7 Hz, 4 JHH = 1.2 Hz, ArH-4),<br />

7.36 (1H, td, 3 JHH = 8.2 Hz, 4 JHF = 5.5 Hz, ArH-5), 7.66 (1H, ddd, 3 JHF = 9.4 Hz, 4 JHH = 2.7<br />

Hz, 4 JHH = 1.6 Hz, ArH-2), 7.77 (1H, dt, 3 JHH = 7.8 Hz, 4 JHH = 1.6 Hz, ArH-6); δC 68.5<br />

(OCH2), 71.1 (CHOH), 116.6 (d, 2 JCF = 24.1 Hz, ArCH-2), 117.4 (CHCH2), 120.3 (d, 2 JCF =<br />

19.1 Hz, ArCH-4), 125.4 (ArC-6), 130.1 (d, 3 JCF = 7.0 Hz, ArCH-5), 132.0 (d, 3 JCF = 7.0 Hz,<br />

ArC-1), 136.1 (CHCH2), 162.5 (d, 1 JCF = 246.5 Hz, ArCF), 165.5 (C=O); δF –112.2 (1F, s,<br />

CF). m/z (EI + ) 210 ([M] + , 8 %) 123 ([M-OCH2CHOHCH=CH2] + , 100 %). HRMS (EI)<br />

210.06900 (C11H11O3F requires 210.06895).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!