04.12.2012 Views

Synthesis and Comparison of the Reactivity of Allyl Fluorides and ...

Synthesis and Comparison of the Reactivity of Allyl Fluorides and ...

Synthesis and Comparison of the Reactivity of Allyl Fluorides and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

197<br />

Chapter Six<br />

6.5.20 Preparation <strong>of</strong> 2,2-difluoro-1-(4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)but-3-enyl 4-fluoro<br />

benzoate (171)<br />

The title compound was prepared using a method<br />

outlined by Nakamura et al. [7] A 100 cm 3 , two-necked<br />

round-bottomed flask was equipped with a magnetic<br />

stirring bar, <strong>and</strong> Rotaflo tap <strong>and</strong> attached to a Schlenk<br />

line. After flame-drying under high vacuum, <strong>the</strong> flask<br />

was cooled <strong>and</strong> filled with nitrogen. The reaction flask<br />

was charged with 2,2-difluoro-1-(4-(trifluoromethyl)<br />

phenyl)but-3-en-1-ol (42 mg, 0.17 mmol) <strong>and</strong> pyridine (0.5 cm 3 ) <strong>and</strong> cooled to 0 ºC. 4-<br />

Fluorobenzoyl chloride (0.02 cm 3 , 0.17 mmol) was added <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> reaction mixture warmed<br />

to room temperature <strong>and</strong> stirred for 2 h. After which <strong>the</strong> reaction was quenched with brine<br />

(6 cm 3 ) <strong>and</strong> diethyl e<strong>the</strong>r (5 cm 3 ). The organic layer was <strong>the</strong>n separated <strong>and</strong> washed with<br />

HCl (1 cm 3 , 5 % aqueous solution), saturated brine (10 cm 3 ), saturated NaHCO3 (10 cm 3 )<br />

<strong>and</strong> saturated brine (10 cm 3 ) successively, <strong>the</strong>n dried over magnesium sulphate. After<br />

removal <strong>of</strong> solvent in vacuo <strong>the</strong> crude product was purified by column chromatography<br />

[chlor<strong>of</strong>orm: hexane (50:50)], affording <strong>the</strong> product as an oil (39 mg, 63%). δH 5.48 (1H,d,<br />

3 JHH = 11.0 Hz, Hb), 5.64(1H, dt, 3 JHH = 17.6 Hz, 4 JHF = 2.3 Hz, Ha), 5.85 (1H, ddt, 3 JHH =<br />

17.6 Hz, 3 JHF = 12.5 Hz, 3 JHH = 11.0 Hz, Hc), 6.08 (1H, dd, 3 JHF = 11.3 Hz, 3 JHF = 9.0 Hz,<br />

CHO), 7.08 (2H, tm, 3 JHH = 9.0 Hz, ArH-3’), 7.53 (2H, d, 3 JHH = 8.6 Hz, ArH-3), 7.57 (2H,<br />

d, 3 JHH = 8.6 Hz, ArH-2), 8.04 (2H, ddm, 3 JHH = 9.0 Hz, 4 JHF = 5.5 Hz ArH-2’); δC 75.3 (t,<br />

2 JCF = 30.2 Hz, CHCF2), 115.9 (d, 2 JCF = 21.4 Hz, ArCH-3’), 117.9 (t, 1 JCF = 246.5 Hz,<br />

CF2), 122.6 (t, 3 JCF = 8.8 Hz, CHCH2), 123.8 (q, 1 JCF = 271.6 Hz, ArCF3), 125.2 (d, 4 JCF =<br />

2.5 Hz, ArC-1’), 125.4 (q, 3 JCF = 3.8 Hz, ArCH-3), 128.6 (ArCH-2), 129.3 (t, 2 JCF = 25.2<br />

Hz, CHCH2), 131.4 (q, 2 JCF = 32.7 Hz, ArCH-4), 132.6 (d, 3 JCF = 8.8 Hz, ArCH-2’), 137.1<br />

(ArC-1), 163.7 (C=O), 166.3 (d, 1 JCF = 255.3 Hz, ArCF’); δF -62.8 (3F, s, CF3), -103.8 (1F,<br />

s, CF), -105.8 (d, 2 JFF = 254.3 Hz, CF), -109.4 (d, 2 JFF = 250.4 Hz, CF). m/z (EI + ) 374<br />

([M] + , 13 %), 297 ([M-CF2CH=CH2] + , 76 %), 123 ([M-CHO(C6H4CH3) CF2CH=CH2] + , 100<br />

%). HRMS (EI) 374.07384 (C18H12O2F6 requires 374.07385).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!