04.12.2012 Views

Synthesis and Comparison of the Reactivity of Allyl Fluorides and ...

Synthesis and Comparison of the Reactivity of Allyl Fluorides and ...

Synthesis and Comparison of the Reactivity of Allyl Fluorides and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

73<br />

Chapter Three<br />

In <strong>the</strong> reaction <strong>of</strong> (115) in solvents such as benzene, DCM <strong>and</strong> THF, syn addition occurred<br />

almost exclusively (Table 3.1). In contrast, when MeCN <strong>and</strong> DMSO were used as <strong>the</strong><br />

solvents anti addition was observed. This was <strong>the</strong> case for both Pd2(dba)3 <strong>and</strong><br />

Pd(COD)(MA) starting materials. This may be due to <strong>the</strong> fact <strong>the</strong>se solvents can prevent<br />

Pd-Cl bond formation inherent in syn addition through coordination to Pd, or by stabilising<br />

<strong>the</strong> anti addition transition state in which charge separation takes place to a greater extent<br />

than in syn addition. Whereas syn addition which leads to <strong>the</strong> trans isomer may be<br />

proceeding via an SN2’ mechanism.<br />

With (114) both DCM <strong>and</strong> THF afforded equimolar amounts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> syn <strong>and</strong> anti addition<br />

products. Whilst MeCN exclusively yielded <strong>the</strong> product <strong>of</strong> anti addition <strong>and</strong> benzene<br />

afforded predominantly <strong>the</strong> syn addition product.<br />

Interestingly, when (115) was reacted with Pd(PPh3)4 (Scheme 3.3), anti addition occurred<br />

when both benzene <strong>and</strong> DCM were used affording <strong>the</strong> cis isomer exclusively.<br />

Scheme 3.3 Reaction <strong>of</strong> (115) with Pd(PPh3)4<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>r work by Kurosawa et al. examined <strong>the</strong> influence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lig<strong>and</strong> bound to Pd(0), that<br />

was also found to affect <strong>the</strong> stereochemistry <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> oxidative addition. [20] The results in<br />

Table 3.2 reveal that <strong>the</strong> reactions <strong>of</strong> Pd(COD)(MA) <strong>and</strong> Pd(NBE)2(MA), in <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong><br />

additives proceed with <strong>the</strong> preferential formation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> syn addition product. Upon <strong>the</strong><br />

addition <strong>of</strong> additives, <strong>the</strong> percentage <strong>of</strong> anti product obtained increases. This may be due to<br />

<strong>the</strong> replacement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> maleic anhydride lig<strong>and</strong> by <strong>the</strong> additive, forming anti addition<br />

directive complexes such as Pd(COD)2 or Pd(NBE)3. However, little if any, evidence <strong>of</strong><br />

free maleic anhydride was observed when 1 H NMR spectroscopy was conducted on <strong>the</strong><br />

mixtures <strong>of</strong> Pd(COD)(MA) with COD or that <strong>of</strong> Pd(NBE)2(MA) with NBE [each in a (1:10<br />

ratio)]. This suggests that <strong>the</strong> Pd(0) complexes possessing <strong>the</strong> more electron-donating olefin<br />

lig<strong>and</strong>s, Pd(COD)2 or Pd(NBE)3, undergo anti oxidative addition much faster than<br />

Pd(COD)(MA) <strong>and</strong> Pd(NBE)2(MA), undergo syn addition. In contrast, Pd(NBE)3 formed<br />

almost exclusively <strong>the</strong> anti product. However, addition <strong>of</strong> electron-withdrawing additives<br />

caused <strong>the</strong> selectivity to decrease forming more syn product.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!