04.12.2012 Views

Synthesis and Comparison of the Reactivity of Allyl Fluorides and ...

Synthesis and Comparison of the Reactivity of Allyl Fluorides and ...

Synthesis and Comparison of the Reactivity of Allyl Fluorides and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

140<br />

Chapter Six<br />

(1H, td, 3 JHH = 8.2 Hz, 4 JHF = 5.9 Hz, ArH-5), 7.67 (1H, ddd, 3 JHF = 9.4 Hz, 4 JHH = 2.7 Hz,<br />

4 JHH = 1.6 Hz, ArH-2), 7.79 (1H, dt, 3 JHH = 7.4 Hz, 4 JHH = 1.6 Hz, ArH-6); δC 64.9 (OCH2),<br />

115.5 (d, 2 JCF = 23.1 Hz, ArCH-2), 117.5 (CHCH2), 119.0 (d, 2 JCF = 21.1 Hz, ArCH-4),<br />

124.4 (ArCH-6), 129.0 (d, 3 JCF = 8.0 Hz, ArCH-5), 130.9 (CHCH2), 131.4 (d, 3 JCF = 7.0 Hz,<br />

ArC-1), 161.6 (d, 1 JCF = 247.5 Hz, ArCF), 164.1 (d, 4 JCF = 3.0 Hz, C=O); δF -112.4 (1F, s,<br />

CF). m/z (EI + ) 180 ([M] + , 70 %), 123 ([M-OCH2CH=CH2] + , 100 %). HRMS (EI)<br />

180.05842 (C10H9O2F requires 180.05843).<br />

6.2.6 Preparation <strong>of</strong> allyl 2-fluorobenzoate (83) [5]<br />

The title compound was prepared following <strong>the</strong> method<br />

outlined by Yasui et al. without modification. [2] A 50 cm 3 ,<br />

two-necked round-bottom flask was equipped with a<br />

magnetic stirring bar <strong>and</strong> Rotaflo tap <strong>and</strong> attached to a<br />

Schlenk line. After flame-drying under high vacuum, <strong>the</strong> flask was cooled <strong>and</strong> filled with<br />

nitrogen. The flask was charged with 2-fluorobenzoyl chloride (1 g, 0.75 cm 3 , 6.31 mmol)<br />

<strong>and</strong> anhydrous diethyl e<strong>the</strong>r (7 cm 3 ). The reaction mixture was cooled to 0 °C using an ice<br />

bath. <strong>Allyl</strong> alcohol (0.33 g, 0.39 cm 3 , 5.73 mmol) <strong>and</strong> triethylamine (0.64 g, 0.88 cm 3 , 6.31<br />

mmol) were added <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> reaction mixture <strong>the</strong>n stirred at 0 ºC for 2 h, after which it was<br />

warmed to room temperature <strong>and</strong> stirred overnight. The reaction mixture was diluted with<br />

ethyl acetate <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> organic layer extracted <strong>and</strong> washed successively with 2M HCl (2 x 2<br />

cm 3 ), saturated NaHCO3 <strong>and</strong> brine. The organic layer was dried over MgSO4 <strong>and</strong> solvent<br />

removed in vacuo to yield <strong>the</strong> product as a colourless oil (1.01 g, 98 %). δH 4.78 (2H, ap.dt,<br />

3 JHH = 5.5 Hz, 4 JHH = 1.6 Hz, OCH2), 5.23 (1H, ddt, 3 JHH = 10.6 Hz, 2 JHH = 1.2 Hz, 4 JHH =<br />

1.6 Hz, Ha), 5.37 (1H, ddt, 3 JHH = 17.2 Hz, 2 JHH = 1.6 Hz, 4 JHH = 1.6 Hz, Hb), 5.97 (1H, ddt,<br />

3 JHH = 17.2 Hz, 3 JHH = 10.6 Hz, 3 JHH = 5.5 Hz, Hc), 7.07 (1H, ddd, 3 JHF = 11.0 Hz, 3 JHH = 8.2<br />

Hz, 4 JHH = 1.2 Hz, ArH-3), 7.14 (1H, td, 3 JHH = 7.8 Hz, 4 JHH = 1.2 Hz, ArH-5), 7.45 (1H,<br />

dddd, 3 JHH = 8.2 Hz, 3 JHH = 7.4 Hz, 4 JHF = 4.7 Hz, 4 JHH = 2.0 Hz, ArH-4), 7.89 (1H, td, 3 JHH<br />

= 4 JHF = 7.4 Hz, 4 JHH = 2.0 Hz, ArH-6); δC 65.8 (OCH2), 117.0 (d, 2 JCF = 22.1 Hz, ArCH-3),<br />

118.4 (CHCH2), 118.7 (d, 2 JCF = 10.1 Hz, ArC-1), 123.9 (d, 4 JCF = 6.0 Hz, ArCH-5), 131.9<br />

(ArCH-6), 132.1 (CHCH2), 134.5 (d, 3 JCF = 9.1 Hz, ArCH-4), 162.0 (d, 1 JCF = 260.6 Hz,<br />

ArCF), 164.1 (d, 3 JCF = 3.0 Hz, C=O); δF -109.8 (1F, s, CF). m/z (EI + ) 180 ([M] + , 55 %),<br />

123 ([M-OCH2CH=CH2] + , 100 %). HRMS (EI) 180.05838 (C10H9O2F requires 180.05843).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!