04.12.2012 Views

Synthesis and Comparison of the Reactivity of Allyl Fluorides and ...

Synthesis and Comparison of the Reactivity of Allyl Fluorides and ...

Synthesis and Comparison of the Reactivity of Allyl Fluorides and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6.5.13 Preparation <strong>of</strong> 2,2-difluorobut-3-enyl 2-fluorobenzoate (178)<br />

192<br />

Chapter Six<br />

The title compound was prepared using a method<br />

outlined by Nakamura et al. [7] A 100 cm 3 , two-necked<br />

round-bottomed flask was equipped with a magnetic<br />

stirring bar, <strong>and</strong> Rotaflo tap <strong>and</strong> attached to a Schlenk<br />

line. After flame-drying under high vacuum, <strong>the</strong> flask was cooled <strong>and</strong> filled with nitrogen.<br />

The reaction flask was charged with 2,2-difluorobut-3-en-1-ol (ca. 0.05 g in 40 cm 3 DCM,<br />

0.49 mmol) <strong>and</strong> pyridine (1 cm 3 ) <strong>and</strong> cooled to 0 ºC. 2-fluorobenzoyl chloride (0.4 cm 3 ,<br />

2.45 mmol) was added <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> reaction mixture stirred at 0 ºC for 4 h. After which <strong>the</strong><br />

reaction was quenched with brine (5 cm 3 ) <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> organic layer separated <strong>and</strong> washed with<br />

HCl (10 cm 3 , 5 % aqueous solution), saturated brine (10 cm 3 ), saturated NaHCO3 (10 cm 3 )<br />

<strong>and</strong> saturated brine (10 cm 3 ) successively, <strong>the</strong>n dried over magnesium sulphate. After<br />

removal <strong>of</strong> solvent in vacuo <strong>the</strong> crude product was purified by column chromatography<br />

[chlor<strong>of</strong>orm: hexane (50:50)], affording <strong>the</strong> product as an oil (35 mg, 25 %). δH 4.49 (2H,<br />

ap.t, 3 JHF = 12.1 Hz, CHO), 5.51 (1H, d, 3 JHH = 11.0 Hz, 2 JHH = 0.8 Hz, Hb), 5.73 (1H, ddt,<br />

3 JHH = 17.6 Hz, 4 JHF = 3.1 Hz, 2 JHH = 0.8 Hz, Ha), 5.96 (1H, ddt, 3 JHH = 17.6 Hz, 3 JHF = 11.3<br />

Hz, 3 JHH = 11.0 Hz, Hc), 7.18 (1H, m, ArH-3), 7.25 (1H, m, ArH-5), 7.59 (1H, m, ArH-4),<br />

7.98 (1H, m, ArH-6); δC 64.7 (t, 2 JCF = 32.1 Hz, OCH2), 117.2 (d, 2 JCF = 24.1 Hz, ArCH-3),<br />

117.6 (t, 1 JCF = 240.9 Hz, CF2), 121.7 (t, 3 JCF = 10.0 Hz, CHCH2), 124.1 (d, 4 JCF = 4.0 Hz,<br />

ArCH-5), 130.0 (t, 2 JCF = 26.1 Hz, CHCH2), 132.2 (ArCH-6), 134.5 (d, 2 JCF = 10.0 Hz, ArC-<br />

1), 135.1 (d, 3 JCF = 10.0 Hz, ArCH-4), 162.12 (d, 1 JCF = 253.0 Hz, ArCF), 163.2 (C=O); δF, -<br />

105.7 (2F, s, CF2), -108.6 (1F, s, CF). m/z (EI) 230 (M + , 12 %), 123 ([M-<br />

OCH2CF2CH=CH2] + , 100 %). HRMS (EI) 230.05519 (C11H9O2F3 requires 230.05524).<br />

6.5.14 Preparation <strong>of</strong> 2,2-difluorobut-3-enyl 4-methylbenzoate (180)<br />

The title compound was prepared using a method<br />

outlined by Nakamura et al. [7] A 100 cm 3 , two-<br />

necked round-bottomed flask was equipped with<br />

a magnetic stirring bar, <strong>and</strong> Rotaflo tap <strong>and</strong><br />

attached to a Schlenk line. After flame-drying under high vacuum, <strong>the</strong> flask was cooled <strong>and</strong><br />

filled with nitrogen. The reaction flask was charged with 2,2-difluorobut-3-en-1-ol (ca.<br />

0.05 g in 40 cm 3 DCM, 0.49 mmol) <strong>and</strong> pyridine (1 cm 3 ) <strong>and</strong> cooled to 0 ºC. 4-<br />

methylbenzoyl chloride (0.3 cm 3 , 2.45 mmol) was added <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> reaction mixture stirred at<br />

0 ºC for 4 h. After which <strong>the</strong> reaction was quenched with brine (5 cm 3 ) <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> organic

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!