13.07.2015 Views

Dec 2010 - South Worcestershire Development Plan

Dec 2010 - South Worcestershire Development Plan

Dec 2010 - South Worcestershire Development Plan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SOUTH WORCESTERSHIRE ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT <strong>2010</strong>105emerging SWDP, as it is fundamental to increasing the self reliance of<strong>South</strong> <strong>Worcestershire</strong> and decreasing the need to travel.9.13 The strong performance of Wychavon in relation to job creation and theavailability of employment sites is a further consideration for theemerging SWDP, which will look at the roles of the constituent partsand settlements of <strong>South</strong> <strong>Worcestershire</strong>.Are housing targets being met?9.14 Indicators (based on the WMRSS) relating to future housing deliveryhave been recorded as relatively positive. However as discussedthrough out the AMR, considerable uncertainty over the status of theWMRSS in the short term along with the need to prepare more locallyderived targets in a timely fashion, will impact <strong>South</strong> <strong>Worcestershire</strong>’sability to ensure that suitable land is available to deliver housing up to2030.9.15 Much good work has been done to help facilitate a future supply of landand the joint Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment isconsidered a key milestone. Currently based against the soon to berevoked WMRSS Phase Two Malvern Hills and Wychavon Districts donot have a five year supply of land for housing. Wychavon’s housingland supply is expected to improve significantly next year as a result ofit recently approving several large housing developments across theDistrict. Worcester City is considered to have a five year supply of landfor housing against all regional targets.Is Environmental Quality Improving?9.16 The picture in relation to environmental quality is generally positive,though there are again issues with the lack of set targets against whichto monitor improvements. Lack of up to date information about lossesof areas of biodiversity is a key matter that is highlighted and needs tobe addressed if reporting on this core indicator is to be comprehensiveand meaningful. The first reporting against the Building for Life indicator

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!