Dec 2010 - South Worcestershire Development Plan

SOUTH WORCESTERSHIRE ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT 2010219SA Objective SEA Topic Decision Making CriteriaSignificant Effect Indicators2008/2009 Data 2009/2010 DataWorcester – 59% good, 13.1%fair, 27% poor.ChangeChemical water quality: 81.6%good, 12.8% fair, 5.5% poor.Wychavon - Chemical waterquality: 81.6% good, 12.8%fair, 5.5% poor.Due to no data update from DEFRA, thisindicator remains unchanged.Malvern – 87 good, 12.5 fair,0.5 poorWorcester – 55 good, 45 fair,0 poor.To improve air, soiland water qualityTo avoid floodingand otherenvironmental riskAir, Waterand soilWater andsoilWill the Local DevelopmentDocument policies helpreduce pollution?Will the Local DevelopmentDocument policies avoidenvironmental risk?CO2 per capita, % commuting bycar, Waste recycling, Wastecomposting (see above statistics)Wychavon - There was 1 objectionreceived from the EA on waterquality grounds during themonitoring period.Contaminated land: no sitesdesignated as contaminated.CO2 per capita, % commutingby car, Waste recycling, Wastecomposting (see abovestatistics)Wychavon - There were noobjections received from the EAon water quality grounds duringthe monitoring period.Contaminated land: no sitesdesignated as contaminated.N/AWychavon – This is a decrease on theprevious AMR.As this year is the first Joint AMR,Worcester and Malvern’s data was notpreviously monitored in this table.No Change.10.1