13.07.2015 Views

Dec 2010 - South Worcestershire Development Plan

Dec 2010 - South Worcestershire Development Plan

Dec 2010 - South Worcestershire Development Plan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SOUTH WORCESTERSHIRE ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT <strong>2010</strong>218SA Objective SEA Topic <strong>Dec</strong>ision Making CriteriaSignificant Effect Indicators2008/2009 Data 2009/<strong>2010</strong> DataUnfavorable, but recovering:Wychavon- 63.62%Malvern – 30%Changepreviously monitored in this table.SAP ratings: data currentlyunavailableSAP ratings: data currentlyunavailableNo Change.To ensuredevelopmentsconform to highstandards of energyefficiencyClimateFactors, AirWill the Local <strong>Development</strong>Document policies promoteenergy efficiency?Co2 per capita:Wychavon - 11.9UK – 8.4 (New 2007 Estimates).5MW was produced fromrenewable sources (Hill and Moorsite).7 applications for microgenerationschemes were approved.Co2 per capita:Wychavon - 8.6Malvern – 7.2Worcester - 8.6UK – 7.0 (New 2008Estimates).5MW was produced fromrenewable sources (Hill andMoor site).Wychavon - 4 applications formicro generation schemeswere approved.Worcester - 0 applications formicro generation schemeswere approvedAccording to new 2008 estimates (DEFRA),Co2 emissions per capita in Wychavon aredown by 3.3 Wychavon and also by 1.4 inthe UK.As this year is the first Joint AMR,Worcester and Malvern’s data was notpreviously monitored in this table.No Change.Wychavon - Approvals for microgenerationschemes have decreased. Permitted<strong>Development</strong> Rights have seen declinealthough continue to see high numbers ofenquiries and pre-application discussions.As this year is the first Joint AMR,Worcester and Malvern’s data was notpreviously monitored in this table. Due toMalvern’s change in monitoring databasethe information was not available this year.To encouragerenewable energygeneration andmicrogeneration innew developmentsClimateFactors, AirWill the Local <strong>Development</strong>Document policiesencourage renewableenergy sources andgeneration?Biological water quality: 79.3%good, 16.6% fair, 4.2% bad.Wychavon - Biological waterquality: 79.3% good, 16.6%fair, 4.2% poor.Malvern – 80.7% Good, 16.5%fair, 2.8% poorDue to no data update from DEFRA, thisindicator remains unchanged.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!