Dec 2010 - South Worcestershire Development Plan

More documents

Recommendations

Info

SOUTH WORCESTERSHIRE ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT 2010150Conservation Value ClassificationSite NameArea(ha)Elbury Park 3.74Nunnery Wood (LNR) 22.3Hornhill Meadows (LNR) 4.54Leopard Hill 11.84Tolladine Wood (LNR) 2.44Warndon Wood (LNR) 6.25Stock Coppice and Wood10MeadowRiver Severn 4.38Worcester Birmingham Canal 9.8Changes noted where knownLocal Indicator 1: Number of refusals based on Green Network policies.Table 46: Number of refusals based on Green Network Policies(Multiple policies may be used as reasons for refusal for the same application)Policy Used for Refusal 2009/10 2008/09NE4 Nature Conservation – GreenSpaces0 0NE5 Landscape Protection 0 1NE7 Landscaping Scheme 1 0NE9 The Green Network 1 1NE11 M5 Protection Corridor 1 0NE12 Green Belt Area 0 0Local Indicator 2: Planning applications in Green Belt areas.1.10 During the 2009/10 monitoring period the there were no planning approvalsgranted for significant new development in the Green Belt.Core Output Indicator E1 Water Quality & Flooding
SOUTH WORCESTERSHIRE ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT 20101511.11 This indicator monitors the number of Planning permissions granted contrary tothe advice of the Environment Agency on either flood defence grounds or waterquality.1.12 During the 2009/10 monitoring period no applications were granted approvaldespite an objection from the environment agency on the grounds of waterquality or flood risk.Local indicator 3: Number of refusals based on Flood Protection and WaterQuality policies.Table 47: Number of refusals based on flood protection and water pollutionpoliciesPolicy Used for RefusalNumberNE20 – Safeguarding Watercourses 0NE21 & 22 – Floodplain ( Blue and Yellow Zone) 0NE23 – Floodplain (Red Zone) 0Total 0(Multiple policies may be used as reasons for refusal for the same application)Policy Aims & Performance1.13 Promoting environmental protection, biodiversity and enhancement ofwildlife habitats(Relates to saved policies NE2 and NE3 of The City of Worcester Local Plan)Whilst there is no evidence that there has been No changesignificant species loss or gain in the past year andall Special Wildlife Sites and Local Nature Reserves have been preserved, thereis a significant lack of historical continuity in the data regarding the quality ofhabitats and changes in biodiversity. However continued monitoring work by theUrban Design and Conservation Team is beginning to improve the quality of datawe have received, so future AMRs should be able to begin recording trends onthis subject.
Page 2 and 3:
South WorcestershireDevelopment Pla
Page 4 and 5:
SOUTH WORCESTERSHIRE ANNUAL MONITOR
Page 6 and 7:
Page 8 and 9:
Page 10 and 11:
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103: SOUTH WORCESTERSHIRE ANNUAL MONITOR
Page 192 and 193: APPENDIX THREE: WYCHAVON DISTRICTLO
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240:
show all

Dec 2010 - South Worcestershire Development Plan

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?