Dec 2010 - South Worcestershire Development Plan

More documents

Recommendations

Info

SOUTH WORCESTERSHIRE ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT 2010158The City Council has also been effective in refusing development contrary topolicy.This year there has been little observable progress on building renewable energycapacities within the City. But relaxation of the permitted development regime forrenewable energy installations means that the amount of micro-generation in thecity is difficult to measure. However until there is either a national, regional orlocal policy requirement for such schemes they are likely to be limited in number.1 Discourage development which would damage the amenities of itslocality through activity, form or purpose;2 ensure the best achievable standards of accessibility to all membersof the community;3 promote the siting of development which reduces the need to travel;4 protect, preserve and enhance Worcester’s architectural and historicheritage both above and below ground;5 improve the appearance of the main entrances to the City and theprincipal access ways through it;6 protect and enhance the historic skyline of the City; and7 ensure development at the urban edge respects the City’s ruralsetting.Relates to saved policies BE12, BE14, BE16, BE18, BE19, BE20, BE21, BE24,BE26 and BE27 of The City of Worcester Local Plan.)There is evidence that due to a continuing trend ofBetterredevelopment of Brownfield land in the City thework of the Conservation Area Committee (CAC) and the Archaeology Serviceare increasingly vital and specialist services consultations and recommendationshave been rising in complexity. For CAC, overall numbers of consultations haveremained fairly consistent with last year and remain at a lower level thanprevious years indicating that conservation policy is becoming increasinglyeffective at discouraging inappropriate development.
SOUTH WORCESTERSHIRE ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT 2010159In terms of archaeology the number of consultations has slightly reduced and aswould be expected so have the number of recommendations, however theproportion of recommendations implemented has slightly risen. This indicatesthat similar to the Conservation Area Committee archaeologicalrecommendations are having a greater influence on the outcome of applications.
Page 2 and 3:
South WorcestershireDevelopment Pla
Page 4 and 5:
SOUTH WORCESTERSHIRE ANNUAL MONITOR
Page 6 and 7:
Page 8 and 9:
Page 10 and 11:
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111: SOUTH WORCESTERSHIRE ANNUAL MONITOR
Page 192 and 193: APPENDIX THREE: WYCHAVON DISTRICTLO
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240:
show all

Dec 2010 - South Worcestershire Development Plan

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?