Dec 2010 - South Worcestershire Development Plan

SOUTH WORCESTERSHIRE ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT 2010116SAObjectiveSEATopicDecision MakingCriteriaSignificant Effect Indicators2008/2009 Data 2009/2010 DataChangeTo encouragerenewableenergygenerationandmicrogeneration in newdevelopmentsClimateFactors,AirWill the LocalDevelopment Documentpolicies encouragerenewable energysources andgeneration?Biological water quality:79.3% good, 16.6% fair, 4.2%bad.Wychavon - Biologicalwater quality: 79.3%good, 16.6% fair, 4.2%poor.MH:80.7% Good, 16.5%fair, 2.8% poorWorcester – 59% good,13.1% fair, 27% poor.Due to no data update from DEFRA,this indicator remains unchanged.Chemical water quality:81.6% good, 12.8% fair, 5.5%poor.Wychavon - Chemicalwater quality: 81.6%good, 12.8% fair, 5.5%poor.Due to no data update from DEFRA,this indicator remains unchanged.MH:87 good, 12.5 fair, 0.5poorWorcester – 55 good, 45fair, 0 poor.To improveair, soil andwater qualityTo avoidflooding andotherAir, Waterand soilWater andsoilWill the LocalDevelopment Documentpolicies help reducepollution?Will the LocalDevelopment Documentpolicies avoidCO2 per capita, % commutingby car, Waste recycling,Waste composting (see abovestatistics)Wychavon - There was 1objection received from theEA on water quality groundsCO2 per capita, %commuting by car, Wasterecycling, Wastecomposting (see abovestatistics)Wychavon - There wereno objections receivedfrom the EA on waterN/AWych:This is a decrease on theprevious AMR.