Advisory Committee on Pesticides Annual Report 2001
ACP Annual Report 2001 - Pesticides Safety Directorate
ACP Annual Report 2001 - Pesticides Safety Directorate
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Advisory</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Committee</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Pesticides</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2001</strong><br />
B<strong>on</strong>e oil<br />
B<strong>on</strong>e oil has been used as a repellent against various animals since the 1890s.<br />
Following the introducti<strong>on</strong> of the C<strong>on</strong>trol of <strong>Pesticides</strong> Regulati<strong>on</strong>s (COPR)<br />
in 1986, approval was granted for the outdoor use of a product c<strong>on</strong>taining<br />
b<strong>on</strong>e oil as a repellent in the home garden.<br />
The ACP noted that it had set requirements in November 1999 for a<br />
descripti<strong>on</strong> of a more standardised manufacturing process to ensure that the<br />
c<strong>on</strong>stituents of b<strong>on</strong>e oil fell within a defined range together with the resultant<br />
technical specificati<strong>on</strong> details.<br />
Data had since been submitted but the <str<strong>on</strong>g>Committee</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>sidered that a<br />
satisfactory risk assessment could not be c<strong>on</strong>ducted because a large<br />
proporti<strong>on</strong> of the b<strong>on</strong>e oil remained uncharacterised. The b<strong>on</strong>e oil was of<br />
a potentially variable nature and was manufactured in a way that did not<br />
exclude the possibility of harmful compounds being present.<br />
40<br />
The <str<strong>on</strong>g>Committee</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>cluded that despite a serious attempt, the approval holder<br />
had been unable to meet the requirements satisfactorily and therefore the<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Committee</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>sidered that approval for ‘Renardine 72–2’ (MAFF 06769)<br />
should be revoked.<br />
However, in resp<strong>on</strong>se to representati<strong>on</strong>s from the approval holder, the<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Committee</str<strong>on</strong>g> rec<strong>on</strong>sidered b<strong>on</strong>e oil at a subsequent meeting at which the<br />
approval holder made a presentati<strong>on</strong>. The ACP remained doubtful that it<br />
would be possible to generate further data to address their c<strong>on</strong>cerns within<br />
a reas<strong>on</strong>able timeframe. However, they agreed not to provide advice to<br />
Ministers until they had received further guidance from an independent<br />
chemist. They would c<strong>on</strong>sider b<strong>on</strong>e oil again when this advice was received.<br />
Chlorpyrifos-methyl – envir<strong>on</strong>mental risk assessment<br />
Chlorpyrifos-methyl is an insecticide for the fabric treatment of cereal grain<br />
stores/handling machinery and for use in food storage in the treatment of<br />
cereal grain.<br />
The ACP c<strong>on</strong>sidered that the sole approved use of chlorpyrifos-methyl in the<br />
UK, for post-harvest protecti<strong>on</strong> of cereal grain, would not lead to any direct<br />
c<strong>on</strong>taminati<strong>on</strong> of soil or water, either during or after applicati<strong>on</strong>. It was<br />
c<strong>on</strong>sidered that direct polluti<strong>on</strong> of air in the open envir<strong>on</strong>ment might occur<br />
during venting or fumigati<strong>on</strong> procedures at storage facilities. However, such<br />
polluti<strong>on</strong> would be limited in geographical extent and durati<strong>on</strong> and would<br />
occur <strong>on</strong>ly in the locality of the storage facility. C<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s in the air