Advisory Committee on Pesticides Annual Report 2001
ACP Annual Report 2001 - Pesticides Safety Directorate
ACP Annual Report 2001 - Pesticides Safety Directorate
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Advisory</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Committee</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Pesticides</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2001</strong><br />
N<strong>on</strong>agricultural<br />
use<br />
requirements, and the provisi<strong>on</strong> of further data <strong>on</strong> physical/chemical<br />
properties, methods of analysis, c<strong>on</strong>sumer exposure and operator exposure.<br />
● 3-IODO-2-PROPYNYL-N-BUTYL CARBAMATE (IPBC)<br />
● AZAMETHIPHOS<br />
●<br />
CCA<br />
●<br />
DICHLOROPHEN<br />
●<br />
DICHLORVOS<br />
●<br />
DIURON<br />
●<br />
FENITROTHION<br />
●<br />
IRGAROL<br />
●<br />
LINDANE<br />
●<br />
PIRIMIPHOS-METHYL<br />
52<br />
3-iodo-2-propynyl-N-butyl carbamate (IPBC)<br />
3-iodo-2-propynyl-N-butyl carbamate (IPBC) is a broad-spectrum carbamate<br />
fungicide used in wood preservatives and surface biocides. It is <strong>on</strong>e of the<br />
chemicals in the current UK review of organophosphorus and carbamate<br />
compounds. The ACP recommended, in June 1999, that all pesticide products<br />
c<strong>on</strong>taining a cholinesterase-inhibiting compound should be labelled to reflect<br />
this fact. Letters were sent to all approval holders to notify them of this<br />
requirement.<br />
The main manufacturer and data holder for IPBC did not feel that this label<br />
was justified for products c<strong>on</strong>taining IPBC. It presented a reas<strong>on</strong>ed case to<br />
remove this labelling of its products <strong>on</strong> the grounds that any effects seen were<br />
very weak. The <str<strong>on</strong>g>Committee</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>sidered summaries of the studies submitted as<br />
part of the reas<strong>on</strong>ed case.<br />
The <str<strong>on</strong>g>Committee</str<strong>on</strong>g> was c<strong>on</strong>tent that adequate data were available to indicate<br />
the cholinesterase-inhibiting properties of IPBC and that no further data were<br />
required at this stage. On the basis of these data the <str<strong>on</strong>g>Committee</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>cluded<br />
that IPBC should c<strong>on</strong>tinue to be part of the UK review of anticholinesterase<br />
compounds used in n<strong>on</strong>-agricultural pesticides. The <str<strong>on</strong>g>Committee</str<strong>on</strong>g> recommended<br />
that the products should have the following revised precauti<strong>on</strong>ary labelling<br />
phrase: