02.09.2015 Views

Advisory Committee on Pesticides Annual Report 2001

ACP Annual Report 2001 - Pesticides Safety Directorate

ACP Annual Report 2001 - Pesticides Safety Directorate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Secti<strong>on</strong> E: UK Review Programme<br />

Phosphides<br />

The ACP was updated regarding the review of phosphides and progress with<br />

a requirement set previously for a strategy to address potential genotoxicity<br />

in exposed operators.<br />

The <str<strong>on</strong>g>Committee</str<strong>on</strong>g> noted the c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong>s from a new assessment by the<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Committee</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> Mutagenicity of Chemicals in Food, C<strong>on</strong>sumer Products and the<br />

Envir<strong>on</strong>ment (CoM). The CoM now c<strong>on</strong>sidered that, in the light of new data<br />

available, a study of genotoxicity in UK pesticide applicators, as previously<br />

proposed, was no l<strong>on</strong>ger necessary. The ACP agreed with this c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong><br />

but c<strong>on</strong>sidered that a study of operator exposure was still required.<br />

Pirimicarb<br />

Pirimicarb is a carbamate insecticide formulated in a range of products,<br />

approved for use <strong>on</strong> various agricultural and horticultural crops and in <strong>on</strong>e<br />

product for amateur use. In April <strong>2001</strong>, the ACP c<strong>on</strong>sidered a human health<br />

review of this active substance as part of a comprehensive review of<br />

anticholinesterase compounds.<br />

The <str<strong>on</strong>g>Committee</str<strong>on</strong>g> had previously c<strong>on</strong>sidered reviews of pirimicarb in 1994<br />

and 1997, at which time it restricted uses and specified data requirements for<br />

c<strong>on</strong>tinuing approval. The human health anticholinesterase review incorporated<br />

new data that had been submitted in resp<strong>on</strong>se to the requirements identified<br />

at the earlier reviews.<br />

49<br />

Based <strong>on</strong> the toxicological evidence provided, the following critical end points<br />

were agreed: an ADI and AOEL of 0.035 mg/kg bw/day; ARfD of 0.1 mg/kg<br />

bw/day.<br />

The <str<strong>on</strong>g>Committee</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>sidered that the estimates of exposures to operators,<br />

workers and bystanders (based <strong>on</strong> calculati<strong>on</strong>s using standard predictive<br />

models) were acceptable, subject to a requirement for additi<strong>on</strong>al pers<strong>on</strong>al<br />

protective clothing to be worn during knapsack spraying.<br />

Although not all the residues data provided reflected UK Good Agricultural<br />

Practice (GAP), the <str<strong>on</strong>g>Committee</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>sidered the c<strong>on</strong>sumer risk assessment was<br />

adequate to allow c<strong>on</strong>tinued approval <strong>on</strong> most crops, pending the generati<strong>on</strong><br />

of further residues data. Since there were no residues data to support use <strong>on</strong><br />

celery, kohlrabi, grassland and plums, the <str<strong>on</strong>g>Committee</str<strong>on</strong>g> advised that these uses<br />

should be revoked.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!