21.09.2015 Views

Advanced Techniques in Diagnostic Microbiology

Advanced Techniques in

Advanced Techniques in

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

9. Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis 145<br />

Bacterial Cell Lysis and Release of Intact Chromosomal DNA<br />

A pure culture of a bacterial isolate of known identity is <strong>in</strong>cubated overnight <strong>in</strong> a<br />

nutrient broth, such as trypticase soy broth (BD Biosciences, Sparks, MD, USA) <strong>in</strong><br />

order to achieve 10 9 cells/mL, which is the concentration needed to obta<strong>in</strong> a visible<br />

band pattern. Standard DNA extraction procedures are <strong>in</strong>appropriate for the analysis<br />

of large chromosomal DNA molecules because of DNA shear<strong>in</strong>g caused by the<br />

application of mechanical force <strong>in</strong> the protocol. In order to prevent DNA damage,<br />

it is important to mix <strong>in</strong>tact bacterial cells with warmed, liquid-phase agarose,<br />

and this mixture can then be pipetted <strong>in</strong>to plastic molds to form 10 × 5 × 1.5mm<br />

agarose plugs. The whole cells embedded <strong>in</strong> plugs are lysed and deprote<strong>in</strong>ized by<br />

detergents and enzymes (e.g., lysostaph<strong>in</strong>, lysozyme, prote<strong>in</strong>ase K, mutanolys<strong>in</strong><br />

or lyticase) <strong>in</strong> situ (Table 9.1). Follow<strong>in</strong>g cell lysis, the plugs are washed 4–5 times<br />

with wash buffer conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 20 mM Tris and 50 mM EDTA (pH 8.0) to remove<br />

cell debris and prote<strong>in</strong>ase. The agarose gel matrix keeps chromosomal DNA <strong>in</strong>tact<br />

while remov<strong>in</strong>g the rest of cellular components from the plug. This step, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the post-lysis wash<strong>in</strong>g, usually takes 2 days. In recent years, several <strong>in</strong>vestigators<br />

have reported improvements to the traditional DNA preparation process. The most<br />

notable time-sav<strong>in</strong>g approaches have <strong>in</strong>cluded (i) directly us<strong>in</strong>g bacterial colonies<br />

grown on plates of cl<strong>in</strong>ical specimens, (ii) us<strong>in</strong>g a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of lytic enzymes,<br />

(iii) add<strong>in</strong>g lytic enzymes to the bacterial suspensions before prepar<strong>in</strong>g the agarose<br />

plugs, (iv) shorten<strong>in</strong>g the cell lysis time by reduc<strong>in</strong>g the size of agarose plug, and (v)<br />

expedit<strong>in</strong>g the wash steps by us<strong>in</strong>g a large volume (10 mL) of preheated (50 ◦ C)<br />

water and TE buffer (Gautom, 1997; Turabelidze et al., 2000; Lopez-Canovas<br />

et al., 2003). Of particular <strong>in</strong>terest, a DNA purification system was designed to<br />

automate all steps <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the preparation of DNA plugs for PFGE (Fiett et al.,<br />

2004).<br />

Restriction Endonuclease Digestion of Chromosomal DNA<br />

A large amount of clean, <strong>in</strong>tact chromosomal DNA embedded <strong>in</strong> agarose plugs can<br />

be easily digested with a variety of restriction endonucleases. Each of those enzymes<br />

is found to cleave double-stranded DNA at a specific nucleotide sequence,<br />

known as the enzyme’s recognition site. Once the recognition site is located, the<br />

enzyme catalyzes the digestion of DNA at that def<strong>in</strong>ed position either close to<br />

or with<strong>in</strong> the targeted sequence, caus<strong>in</strong>g a break <strong>in</strong> the nucleic acid strand, and<br />

produc<strong>in</strong>g discrete restriction fragments. The choice of the restriction enzyme is<br />

dependent upon the bacterial species studied. The number and size of fragments<br />

generated by an endonuclease depends on the frequency of the specific restriction<br />

enzyme recognition sites located on a particular bacterial genome. This cutt<strong>in</strong>g<br />

frequency is a function of the number of base pairs required for enzyme recognition<br />

(longer sequences lead to less enzyme recognition), and the GC content of<br />

the genome. For example, the restriction enzyme, SmaI, recognizes the CCC/GGG<br />

sequence that cleaves the DNA of most Gram-positive bacteria, whereas XbaI recognizes<br />

the T/CTAGA sequence that cleaves that of many Gram-negative bacteria.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!