21.09.2015 Views

Advanced Techniques in Diagnostic Microbiology

Advanced Techniques in

Advanced Techniques in

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

412 P. Francois and J. Schrenzel<br />

antibiotics aga<strong>in</strong>st MRSA (e.g., glycopeptides and oxazolid<strong>in</strong>ones) (Sakoulas et al.,<br />

2002).<br />

An extensive screen<strong>in</strong>g of MRSA carriers at hospital admission, despite its<br />

important cost, appears to have a major impact <strong>in</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g MRSA nosocomial<br />

<strong>in</strong>fection rates (Wernitz et al., 2005), as recently shown by Wernitz and colleagues.<br />

Indeed, MRSA carriage or colonization is a major risk factor for becom<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>fected.<br />

The preferred colonization sites are the nose, the throat, and the sk<strong>in</strong> surface<br />

(Kluytmans et al., 1997). The spread of MRSA occurs generally after contact<br />

with carriers (Grundmann et al., 2005) or “MRSA reservoirs” (parts of which are<br />

probably unknown). The spread of MRSA <strong>in</strong> health care centers is difficult to<br />

control and requires elaborate <strong>in</strong>fection control guidel<strong>in</strong>es (Cohen et al., 1991;<br />

Nettleman et al., 1991; Pittet et al., 1996; Cosseron-Zerbib et al., 1998; Chaix<br />

et al., 1999; Papia et al., 1999; Harbarth et al., 2000) <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g (i) large-scale<br />

screen<strong>in</strong>g of suspected carriers, (ii) automated computerized alerts, (iii) specific<br />

recommendations for at-risk patients, such as contact isolation (Pittet et al., 1996,<br />

1997; Harbarth and Pittet, 1998), and (iv) significant improvement of hand hygiene<br />

compliance (Pittet et al., 2000). These data, together with successful conta<strong>in</strong>ment<br />

effort programs (Cohen et al., 1991; Nettleman et al., 1991; Pittet et al., 1996;<br />

Cosseron-Zerbib et al., 1998; Chaix et al., 1999; Papia et al., 1999; Harbarth et<br />

al., 2000) prompt for screen<strong>in</strong>g high-risk patients even <strong>in</strong> a highly endemic sett<strong>in</strong>g<br />

(Rub<strong>in</strong>ovitch and Pittet, 2001). Several <strong>in</strong>ternational guidel<strong>in</strong>es now recommend<br />

the screen<strong>in</strong>g of potential MRSA-positive patients at hospital admission (BSAC,<br />

1998; KKI, 1999; Muto et al., 2003). However, despite <strong>in</strong>tensive efforts <strong>in</strong> the<br />

application of such guidel<strong>in</strong>es, MRSA spread rema<strong>in</strong>s difficult to control.<br />

Molecular Epidemiology<br />

Molecular techniques dedicated to bacterial detection and identification have been<br />

recently reviewed (Nolte et al., 2003; Diekema et al., 2004). In the case of MRSA,<br />

the mecA gene encod<strong>in</strong>g for the low-aff<strong>in</strong>ity penicill<strong>in</strong>-b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g prote<strong>in</strong> PBP2 ′ is<br />

the genetic basis of methicill<strong>in</strong> resistance <strong>in</strong> MRSA isolates. This gene, orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g<br />

from a mobile genetic element designated SCCmec [staphylococcal cassette<br />

chromosome mec (Katayama et al., 2003)], flanked by term<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>verted and direct<br />

repeats (Ito et al., 2001), is <strong>in</strong>variably <strong>in</strong>serted <strong>in</strong>to the orfX gene of S. aureus chromosome<br />

(Fig. 24.1). This element conta<strong>in</strong>s two site-specific cassette chromosome<br />

recomb<strong>in</strong>ases, ccrA and ccrB, responsible for the precise excision and <strong>in</strong>tegration<br />

of SCCmec with<strong>in</strong> the bacterial chromosome (Katayama et al., 2003).<br />

To date, five differently organized SCCmec elements have been characterized<br />

(Ito et al., 2003). Three types of SCCmec elements are typically found <strong>in</strong> HA-<br />

MRSA stra<strong>in</strong>s (i) type I, a 34-kb element that was prevalent <strong>in</strong> MRSA isolates <strong>in</strong><br />

the 1960s, (ii) type II, a 53-kb element that was identified <strong>in</strong> 1982 and is ubiquitous<br />

<strong>in</strong> Japan, Korea, and the United states, and (iii) type III, the largest (67-Kb) element,<br />

identified <strong>in</strong> 1985, currently prevalent <strong>in</strong> Germany, Austria, India, and other South<br />

Asian and Pacific areas (Hiramatsu et al., 2001; Ito et al., 2003). In contrast to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!