21.09.2015 Views

Advanced Techniques in Diagnostic Microbiology

Advanced Techniques in

Advanced Techniques in

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

12. Non-PCR Amplification 195<br />

used two l<strong>in</strong>ear allele-specific probes each labeled with a unique fluorophore at<br />

one end and a quencher at the other (Thomas et al., 1999; Faruqi et al., 2001;<br />

Myakishev et al., 2001). The probe backbone conta<strong>in</strong>ed a common b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g site for<br />

amplification-specific primer. When both primers were used <strong>in</strong> the same reaction<br />

tube, the relative amount of each polymorphism could be determ<strong>in</strong>ed from the<br />

sample. This system showed a greater sensitivity than PCR SNP methods, which<br />

was demonstrated by genotyp<strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>g 1 ng of genomic DNA (Faruqi et al., 2001).<br />

Picker<strong>in</strong>g et al. modified probe design that overcame background problems seen<br />

by probe–probe <strong>in</strong>teractions <strong>in</strong> previous studies (Faruqi et al., 2001; Picker<strong>in</strong>g<br />

et al., 2002). Thus, an end-po<strong>in</strong>t fluorescent assay was developed that used a highthroughput<br />

format and did not require the use of real-time fluorescent detectors,<br />

although the assay has been developed for real-time measurements (Christian et al.,<br />

2001; Alsmadi et al., 2003).<br />

Immobilized RCA has also been adapted as a signal enhancer for antibody microarrays,<br />

or “immunoRCA” (Schweitzer et al., 2000, 2002). This assay has been<br />

carried out <strong>in</strong> either the “sandwich” format where a matched pair of antibodies<br />

capture are used to “sandwich” the antigen between the two antibodies (Schweitzer<br />

et al., 2002) or <strong>in</strong> a format where the antigen itself is immobilized and a s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />

ligand-specific antibody is used for detection (Schweitzer et al., 2000; Zhou et al.,<br />

2004). Secondary biot<strong>in</strong>ylated antibodies, each specific for their cognate ligand,<br />

are allowed to b<strong>in</strong>d. This is followed by a third antibody specific for biot<strong>in</strong>, coupled<br />

to an RCA primer. The RCA proceeded as <strong>in</strong> a typical amplification reaction<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g fluorescent detection with Cy3 and Cy5 dyes <strong>in</strong> a microarray analysis format<br />

(Schweitzer et al., 2002). In these <strong>in</strong>itial developmental studies, up to 75 cytok<strong>in</strong>es<br />

were measured simultaneously with femtomolar sensitivity and a three log quantitative<br />

range (Schweitzer et al., 2002).<br />

This type of assay illustrates a number of salient po<strong>in</strong>ts about immobilized RCA<br />

technologies: (1) the amplicon is not diffusible, and end product <strong>in</strong>hibition typical<br />

of PCR is not observed; therefore, sensitivity can be <strong>in</strong>creased; (2) the sole reliance<br />

on passive hybridization is elim<strong>in</strong>ated; (3) universal amplification primers can be<br />

used because the selectivity is determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the antibody or, <strong>in</strong> the case of SNP<br />

analysis, by the discrim<strong>in</strong>ation between matched and unmatched bases by DNA<br />

ligase; (4) the technology for spott<strong>in</strong>g and coupl<strong>in</strong>g to slides, as well as slide<br />

read<strong>in</strong>g and data analysis, has already been developed; and (5) these are end-po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

assays so real-time analysis is not necessary.<br />

RCA and In Situ Hybridization<br />

RCA methods have been adapted to <strong>in</strong> situ hybridization, allow<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

<strong>in</strong> sensitivity and the ability to identify s<strong>in</strong>gle nucleotide changes. The limits of<br />

sensitivity of the standard fluorescence <strong>in</strong> situ hybridization (FISH) methods are <strong>in</strong><br />

the several kilobase range except for signal amplification us<strong>in</strong>g tyramide that can<br />

lower this range to the hundreds of nucleotides (Van T<strong>in</strong>e et al., 2004). Thus, FISH<br />

is not able to detect s<strong>in</strong>gle nucleotide changes either <strong>in</strong> DNA with<strong>in</strong> a cytological<br />

context or <strong>in</strong> s<strong>in</strong>gle DNA molecules (Qian and Lloyd, 2003). The application of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!