Research Journal of Economics & Business Studies - RJEBS - The ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table - 2 Progress under Bharat Nirman – Length of Roads (Number) New Connectivity Up-gradation(km) S.No Achievement Target Achievement during 2011 - 12 Target States During (2011- Upgradation (2011-12) Renewal Total 2011-12 12) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 Andhra pradesh 300 169.49 720 87.37 0.00 87.37 2 Arunachal pradesh 166 8.69 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 Assam 250 566.31 24 3.10 0.00 3.10 4 Bihar 3200 883.21 2000 44.62 0.00 44.62 5 Chhattisgarth 1000 110.87 500 88.38 0.00 88.38 6 Goa* 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 7 Gujarat 462 223.27 198 119.77 284.78 404.55 8 Haryana 0 0.00 0 0.00 33.65 33.65 9 Himachal pradesh 500 7.30 250 101.08 0.00 101.08 10 Jammu&Kashmir 500 110.35 250 48.48 0.00 48.48 11 Jharkhand 1000 356.09 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 12 Karnataka 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 13 Kerala 25 9.05 250 80.85 53.96 134.81 14 Madhya pradesh 1200 321.75 2000 194.00 0.00 194.00 15 Maharastra 400 38.08 0 0.00 55.00 55.00 16 Manipur 150 72.65 0 8.71 0.00 8.71 17 Meghalaya 100 10.07 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 18 Mizoram 100 39.86 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 19 Nagaland 20 6.00 150 2.00 15.00 17.00 20 Odisha 900 556.17 1200 564.28 210.74 775.02 21 Punjab 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 22 Rajasthan 250 2.90 0 0.00 280.00 280.00 23 Sikkim 154 1.00 50 0.00 0.00 0.00 24 Tamilnadu 20 8.00 960 414.40 0.00 414.40 25 Tripura 100 13.95 215 0.00 29.88 29.88 26 Uttar pradesh 220 9.99 780 206.28 0.00 206.28 27 Uttarakhand 333 140.64 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 28 West Bengal 650 191.48 203 16.32 0.00 16.32 Total 12000.00 3857.17 9750 1979.64 963.01 2942.65 Table-2 shows road connectivity and upgradation status across the states of India. In regard to the new connectivity of roads among the states, it may be observed that among the states Assam, Bihar, Chattishgarh, Jammu and Kashmir and Madhya prades have should an increasing trend in road connectivity interms of kms. Further, in the rest of the states the progress is slow. It shows that the rural connectivity in the rest of the states showed be given importance and that will lead to development in the rural road infrastructural development. In the upgraduation of rural roads, it may be observed that Andra Pradesh, Gujarat, Kerala, Himachal Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Uttrapradesh and Tamil Nadu have shown a progressive trend as compared to the rest of the states in Indai. It implies the fact that in new connectivity of roads and up gradation, there is progress among www.theinternationaljournal.org > RJEBS: Volume: 02, Number: 06, April-2013 Page 54
the states but at the same time there should be proper monitoring and more funds should be allocated to the states like Goa, Haryana, Himmachal Pradesh, Jarkand, Manipur, Magalaya, Mizoram and other states which and lagging behind in new connectivity of roads and upgradation. Table-3 Projects Sanctioned during 2011-12 under PMGSY (till Dec – 2011 S.No State Value Number of Length in km Rs. Crore roads/Bridges 1 Bihar-RWD 915 647 1899 2 Chhattisgarh 100 101 326 3 Gujarat 54 46 137 4 Himachal Pradesh 156 112 601 5 Jharkhand 635 531 roads+49 2006 bridges 6 Madhya pradesh 1043 743 3105 7 Meghalaya 95 18 106 8 Nagaland 356 56 955 9 Odisha 1467 886 3550 10 Punjab 235 36 499 11 Rajasthan 886 1076 3603 12 Sikkim 206 80 roads + 15 352 bridges 13 Tripura 348 69 roads + 40 370 bridges 14 Uttarpradesh 425 555 957 15 Uttarkhand 72 12 roads +24 bridges 98 16 West Bengal 612 247 1269 Total 7604 5343 19833 Table – 3 exhibits the funds allocated in crores for construction of roads and bridges. It shows that the state Odisha ranks first in getting more funds allocated at Rs.1467 crores followed Madhya Pradesh, Bihar, Rajasthan, West Bengal and other states. The similar trend has been observed in the number of bridges constructed in the 2011-12. In the case of road in kms the state Rajasthan occupied the first place followed by Punjab, Madhya Pradesh, Jarkhand, Bihar and other states. In this context, it may be inferred from the results that the PMGSY has been in progress in extending rural road connectivity as well as construction of bridges across the major states of India. At the same time, there should be more focus on the states like Gujarat, Tripura and Sikkim and other states where the rural road infrastructural development is tardy. IV. Conclusion In the light of the above results and discussion, the following conclusion could be drawn. i. It may be inferred that in the new connectivity of road among the states, Assam, Bihar, Chattish Garh, Jammu and Kashmir and Madhya Pradesh have recorded a progressive trend under PMGSY. As a result, the over all productive economic activities have increased. ii. In the case of road construction in kms, the states Rajasthan, Punjab, Madhya Pradesh, Jarkhand and Bihar have recorded a remarkable performance in rural road infrastructural development. iii. Regarding funds allocation fro construction of roads and bridges, odisha has shown a commendable progress and it is closely followed by Madhya Pradesh Bihar Rajasthan and Bengal iv. By and Large, the rural road infrastructural development has been progressive in the rural areas of India states and its overall progress and performance is highly encouraging. www.theinternationaljournal.org > RJEBS: Volume: 02, Number: 06, April-2013 Page 55
Page 2 and 3: Table of Contents Articles PERFORMA
Page 4 and 5: servicing, and the policies not mee
Page 6 and 7: The Self-Help Group members get inc
Page 8 and 9: Are female workers more productive
Page 10 and 11: For the purpose of including explan
Page 12 and 13: several different, competing logist
Page 14 and 15: Fisher, R.T. (2001), “Role stress
Page 16 and 17: A Comparative Study of NPA of State
Page 18 and 19: processes. Instead of fixing target
Page 20 and 21: Agriculture Crisis and Sustainable
Page 22 and 23: Table 1. World Cereal production ,
Page 24 and 25: Expanding biofuel production The ex
Page 26 and 27: percent of the world’s population
Page 28 and 29: OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-
Page 30 and 31: It can provide the earnings needed
Page 32 and 33: The incubator will also work toward
Page 34 and 35: factor. This is not an easy proposi
Page 36 and 37: ROLE OF LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT IN LE
Page 38 and 39: During the last season red onion fa
Page 40 and 41: Table Mch2 Coef. Std. Err Z P>/Z/ A
Page 42 and 43: lack of capital. The local farmer o
Page 44 and 45: It may be seen that alleviation of
Page 48 and 49: References Chandrasekhar, B P., et
Page 50 and 51: existing cooperative legislation, r
Page 52 and 53: 1.3 THE RESEARCH QUESTIONS 1. What
Page 54 and 55: Table 2: Earnings and Cost Allocati
Page 56 and 57: have an adequate amount of capital
Page 58 and 59: programs and the union was doing on
Page 60 and 61: total assets to other key areas, it
Page 62 and 63: esponded by (7.6%) of the members.
Page 64 and 65: management; Gohe cooperatives savin
Page 66 and 67: Significance of asset quality of St
Page 68 and 69: iii) iv) Doubtful Assets:- a) Doubt
Page 70 and 71: atios and solvency ratios are taken
Page 72 and 73: Ratio of around 3% during 2007-08,
Page 74 and 75: sufficient to draw an inference in
Page 76 and 77: The observed R 2 and F statistics m
Page 78 and 79: Board Composition, Ownership Struct
Page 80 and 81: size as well. During our study it w
Page 82 and 83: standards prevailing in the country
Page 84 and 85: The procedure produces two tests of
Page 86 and 87: hoc test for pair wise comparisons
Page 88 and 89: e said that the board size affects
Page 90 and 91: high-tech small and medium-sized en
Page 92 and 93: Table no.8 - Multiple Comparisons T
Page 94 and 95: Abstract Corporate Social Responsib
Page 96 and 97:
the participation of various level
Page 98 and 99:
Supplier Relations As stakeholders
Page 100 and 101:
CSR initiatives of companies should
Page 102 and 103:
Corporate Social Responsibility Pra
Page 104 and 105:
2011, this district received surplu
Page 106 and 107:
In the case of marginal farmers and
Page 108 and 109:
Findings From the above analysis it
Page 110 and 111:
2. Innovation: Meaning and Dimensio
Page 112 and 113:
data appropriately. Inferences were
Page 114 and 115:
The regression analyses as shown in
Page 116 and 117:
Role of Self-help Group in Socio-ec
Page 118 and 119:
10% for women and men respectively
Page 120 and 121:
MoRD has been constantly reviewing
Page 122 and 123:
76.6% units were found to be existi
Page 124 and 125:
10.Timely release of adequate loans
Page 126 and 127:
Standard of living of Rural Fisher
Page 128 and 129:
Table 1 denotes the infrastructure
Page 130 and 131:
FISHING METHODS USED BY DIFFERENT A
Page 132 and 133:
CONCLUSION Most of the fisher folk
Page 134 and 135:
Objectives: The following objective
Page 136 and 137:
Policies of the Government will hav
Page 138 and 139:
Wastage Schedule (Onion) Sl.No. Pri
Page 140 and 141:
At the end of 2008 the entire world
Page 142:
Conclusion: 9. The inflation can be
show all

Research Journal of Economics & Business Studies - RJEBS - The ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?