Research Journal of Economics & Business Studies - RJEBS - The ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

high-tech small and medium-sized enterprises: Based on analysis of the small and mediumsized listed enterprises empirical data. International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering (ICIII), 2010: Kunming, China, Vol.3, pp.378 – 383. Annexure Tables Table No 3 - Group Statistics Board Size N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean ROCE Percentage Less than 10 54 15.9287 18.05561 2.45706 More than 10 67 19.4549 14.60148 1.78386 PAT Less than 10 54 4.7574E2 1140.06534 155.14324 More than 10 67 2.4408E3 4113.89345 502.59208 ROA Less than 10 54 1.78188E1 62.327403 8.481685 More than 10 67 1.38717E1 16.972589 2.073532 ROE Less than 10 54 7.57333 25.774133 3.507415 More than 10 67 1.52733E1 14.511155 1.772820 ROCE Percentage PAT ROA ROE Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Table no 4 - Independent Samples Test Levene's Test t-test for Equality of Means for Equality of Variances F Sig. T Df Sig. (2- Mean Difference Std. Error Difference 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference tailed) Lower Upper .310 .579 - 119 .237 -3.52622 2.96826 -9.40367 2.35122 1.188 - 1.161 22.013 .000 - 3.404 - 3.736 101.052 .248 -3.52622 3.03632 -9.54944 2.49699 119 .001 - 1965.10058 78.292 .000 - 1965.10058 577.30462 - 3108.22139 525.99261 - 3012.20992 - 821.97977 - 917.99124 4.086 .045 .496 119 .620 3.947047 7.950263 -11.795268 19.689362 2.415 .123 - 2.073 .452 59.354 .653 3.947047 8.731467 -13.522396 21.416491 - 1.959 119 .040 -7.699950 3.714946 -15.055915 -.343986 79.379 .054 -7.699950 3.929994 -15.521826 .121925 www.theinternationaljournal.org > RJEBS: Volume: 02, Number: 06, April-2013 Page 98
ROCE Percentage Table no.5 - Descriptive N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval for Mean Minimum Lower Upper Bound Bound SBSNC 7 19.4514 12.20959 4.61479 8.1594 30.7434 2.57 41.33 SBSCL 47 15.4040 18.81490 2.74443 9.8798 20.9283 -1.09 112.62 LBSNC 4 14.8725 12.95788 6.47894 -5.7464 35.4914 3.49 26.71 LBSNC 63 19.7459 14.74426 1.85760 16.0326 23.4592 .23 75.38 Total 121 17.8812 16.25871 1.47806 14.9548 20.8077 -1.09 112.62 Table no.6 - Test of Homogeneity of Variances Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig. ROCE Percentage .214 3 117 .887 ROA 13.244 3 117 .000 ROE 1.207 3 117 .311 PAT 13.348 3 117 .000 Maximum ROA SBSNC 7 6.60965E1 143.189447 5.412052E1 -66.33160 198.52470 2.106 390.464 SBSCL 47 1.06285E1 37.336588 5.446101 -.33394 21.59093 -91.762 213.904 LBSNC 4 8.57128 9.137788 4.568894 -5.96898 23.11154 .284 16.515 LBSNC 63 1.42083E1 17.340297 2.184672 9.84119 18.57538 .067 107.611 Total 121 1.56332E1 43.336642 3.939695 7.83292 23.43356 -91.762 390.464 ROE SBSNC 7 1.30071E1 10.678417 4.036062 3.13125 22.88303 .530 33.200 SBSCL 47 6.76404 27.301288 3.982302 -1.25192 14.78000 -95.300 87.200 LBSNC 4 1.23700E1 9.592198 4.796099 -2.89333 27.63333 .780 20.500 LBSNC 63 1.54576E1 14.802992 1.865002 11.72953 19.18570 -39.700 64.400 Total 121 1.18369E1 20.591031 1.871912 8.13069 15.54320 -95.300 87.200 PAT SBSNC 7 1.2823E3 1668.30978 6.30562E2 -260.5878 2825.2706 1.27 4904.74 SBSCL 47 3.5561E2 1010.32335 1.47371E2 58.9686 652.2527 -3052.05 4904.74 LBSNC 4 5.6386E3 9011.64567 4.50582E3 -8700.9492 19978.1292 1.13 18924.00 LBSNC 63 2.2378E3 3658.53683 4.60932E2 1316.4209 3159.2020 .60 20040.00 Total 121 1.5639E3 3293.10417 2.99373E2 971.1180 2156.5939 -3052.05 20040.00 Table no.7 - ANOVA Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F Sig. ROCE Percentage Between Groups 560.926 3 186.975 .702 .553 Within Groups 31160.553 117 266.330 Total 31721.479 120 ROA Between Groups 19330.457 3 6443.486 3.659 .015 Within Groups 206037.285 117 1761.002 Total 225367.743 120 ROE Between Groups 2046.121 3 682.040 1.634 .185 Within Groups 48832.749 117 417.374 Total 50878.869 120 PAT Between Groups 1.642E8 3 5.473E7 5.631 .001 Within Groups 1.137E9 117 9719203.026 Total 1.301E9 120 www.theinternationaljournal.org > RJEBS: Volume: 02, Number: 06, April-2013 Page 99
Page 2 and 3:
Table of Contents Articles PERFORMA
Page 4 and 5:
servicing, and the policies not mee
Page 6 and 7:
The Self-Help Group members get inc
Page 8 and 9:
Are female workers more productive
Page 10 and 11:
For the purpose of including explan
Page 12 and 13:
several different, competing logist
Page 14 and 15:
Fisher, R.T. (2001), “Role stress
Page 16 and 17:
A Comparative Study of NPA of State
Page 18 and 19:
processes. Instead of fixing target
Page 20 and 21:
Agriculture Crisis and Sustainable
Page 22 and 23:
Table 1. World Cereal production ,
Page 24 and 25:
Expanding biofuel production The ex
Page 26 and 27:
percent of the world’s population
Page 28 and 29:
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-
Page 30 and 31:
It can provide the earnings needed
Page 32 and 33:
The incubator will also work toward
Page 34 and 35:
factor. This is not an easy proposi
Page 36 and 37:
ROLE OF LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT IN LE
Page 38 and 39:
During the last season red onion fa
Page 40 and 41: Table Mch2 Coef. Std. Err Z P>/Z/ A
Page 42 and 43: lack of capital. The local farmer o
Page 44 and 45: It may be seen that alleviation of
Page 46 and 47: Table - 2 Progress under Bharat Nir
Page 48 and 49: References Chandrasekhar, B P., et
Page 50 and 51: existing cooperative legislation, r
Page 52 and 53: 1.3 THE RESEARCH QUESTIONS 1. What
Page 54 and 55: Table 2: Earnings and Cost Allocati
Page 56 and 57: have an adequate amount of capital
Page 58 and 59: programs and the union was doing on
Page 60 and 61: total assets to other key areas, it
Page 62 and 63: esponded by (7.6%) of the members.
Page 64 and 65: management; Gohe cooperatives savin
Page 66 and 67: Significance of asset quality of St
Page 68 and 69: iii) iv) Doubtful Assets:- a) Doubt
Page 70 and 71: atios and solvency ratios are taken
Page 72 and 73: Ratio of around 3% during 2007-08,
Page 74 and 75: sufficient to draw an inference in
Page 76 and 77: The observed R 2 and F statistics m
Page 78 and 79: Board Composition, Ownership Struct
Page 80 and 81: size as well. During our study it w
Page 82 and 83: standards prevailing in the country
Page 84 and 85: The procedure produces two tests of
Page 86 and 87: hoc test for pair wise comparisons
Page 88 and 89: e said that the board size affects
Page 92 and 93: Table no.8 - Multiple Comparisons T
Page 94 and 95: Abstract Corporate Social Responsib
Page 96 and 97: the participation of various level
Page 98 and 99: Supplier Relations As stakeholders
Page 100 and 101: CSR initiatives of companies should
Page 102 and 103: Corporate Social Responsibility Pra
Page 104 and 105: 2011, this district received surplu
Page 106 and 107: In the case of marginal farmers and
Page 108 and 109: Findings From the above analysis it
Page 110 and 111: 2. Innovation: Meaning and Dimensio
Page 112 and 113: data appropriately. Inferences were
Page 114 and 115: The regression analyses as shown in
Page 116 and 117: Role of Self-help Group in Socio-ec
Page 118 and 119: 10% for women and men respectively
Page 120 and 121: MoRD has been constantly reviewing
Page 122 and 123: 76.6% units were found to be existi
Page 124 and 125: 10.Timely release of adequate loans
Page 126 and 127: Standard of living of Rural Fisher
Page 128 and 129: Table 1 denotes the infrastructure
Page 130 and 131: FISHING METHODS USED BY DIFFERENT A
Page 132 and 133: CONCLUSION Most of the fisher folk
Page 134 and 135: Objectives: The following objective
Page 136 and 137: Policies of the Government will hav
Page 138 and 139: Wastage Schedule (Onion) Sl.No. Pri
Page 140 and 141:
At the end of 2008 the entire world
Page 142:
Conclusion: 9. The inflation can be
show all

Research Journal of Economics & Business Studies - RJEBS - The ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?