Research Journal of Economics & Business Studies - RJEBS - The ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table no.8 - Multiple Comparisons Tukey HSD Post hoc test Dependent (I) Board (J) Board Mean Difference Std. Error Sig. 95% Confidence Interval Variable Composition Composition (I-J) Lower Bound Upper Bound Category Category ROCE Percentage SBSNC SBSCL 4.04739 6.61163 .928 -13.1848 21.2795 LBSNC 4.57893 10.22885 .970 -22.0809 31.2388 LBSNC -.29444 6.50189 1.000 -17.2406 16.6517 SBSCL SBSNC -4.04739 6.61163 .928 -21.2795 13.1848 LBSNC .53154 8.49994 1.000 -21.6222 22.6853 LBSNC -4.34183 3.14548 .514 -12.5400 3.8564 LBSNC SBSNC -4.57893 10.22885 .970 -31.2388 22.0809 SBSCL -.53154 8.49994 1.000 -22.6853 21.6222 LBSNC -4.87337 8.41486 .938 -26.8054 17.0586 LBSNC SBSNC .29444 6.50189 1.000 -16.6517 17.2406 SBSCL 4.34183 3.14548 .514 -3.8564 12.5400 LBSNC 4.87337 8.41486 .938 -17.0586 26.8054 ROA SBSNC SBSCL 55.468057 * 1.700117E1 .008 11.15722 99.77889 LBSNC 57.525265 2.630252E1 .133 -11.02803 126.07856 LBSNC 51.888263 * 1.671898E1 .013 8.31293 95.46360 SBSCL SBSNC -55.468057 * 1.700117E1 .008 -99.77889 -11.15722 LBSNC 2.057208 2.185678E1 1.000 -54.90898 59.02340 LBSNC -3.579794 8.088298 .971 -24.66065 17.50106 LBSNC SBSNC -57.525265 2.630252E1 .133 -126.07856 11.02803 SBSCL -2.057208 2.185678E1 1.000 -59.02340 54.90898 LBSNC -5.637002 2.163800E1 .994 -62.03298 50.75898 LBSNC SBSNC -51.888263 * 1.671898E1 .013 -95.46360 -8.31293 SBSCL 3.579794 8.088298 .971 -17.50106 24.66065 LBSNC 5.637002 2.163800E1 .994 -50.75898 62.03298 ROE SBSNC SBSCL 6.243100 8.276783 .875 -15.32901 27.81521 LBSNC .637143 1.280501E1 1.000 -32.73707 34.01136 LBSNC -2.450476 8.139400 .990 -23.66452 18.76357 SBSCL SBSNC -6.243100 8.276783 .875 -27.81521 15.32901 LBSNC -5.605957 1.064067E1 .952 -33.33915 22.12724 LBSNC -8.693576 3.937674 .127 -18.95649 1.56934 LBSNC SBSNC -.637143 1.280501E1 1.000 -34.01136 32.73707 SBSCL 5.605957 1.064067E1 .952 -22.12724 33.33915 LBSNC -3.087619 1.053416E1 .991 -30.54321 24.36797 LBSNC SBSNC 2.450476 8.139400 .990 -18.76357 23.66452 SBSCL 8.693576 3.937674 .127 -1.56934 18.95649 LBSNC 3.087619 1.053416E1 .991 -24.36797 30.54321 PAT SBSNC SBSCL 926.73079 1.26303E3 .883 -2365.1592 4218.6208 LBSNC -4356.24857 1.95404E3 .121 -9449.1316 736.6345 LBSNC -955.47000 1.24207E3 .868 -4192.7190 2281.7790 SBSCL SBSNC -926.73079 1.26303E3 .883 -4218.6208 2365.1592 LBSNC -5282.97936 * 1.62376E3 .008 -9515.0464 -1050.9123 LBSNC -1882.20079 * 6.00887E2 .012 -3448.3153 -316.0863 LBSNC SBSNC 4356.24857 1.95404E3 .121 -736.6345 9449.1316 SBSCL 5282.97936 * 1.62376E3 .008 1050.9123 9515.0464 LBSNC 3400.77857 1.60751E3 .154 -788.9271 7590.4842 LBSNC SBSNC 955.47000 1.24207E3 .868 -2281.7790 4192.7190 SBSCL 1882.20079 * 6.00887E2 .012 316.0863 3448.3153 LBSNC -3400.77857 1.60751E3 .154 -7590.4842 788.9271 *. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level. www.theinternationaljournal.org > RJEBS: Volume: 02, Number: 06, April-2013 Page 100
Table no.14 - Test of Homogeneity of Variances Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig. ROCEPercentage 1.638 2 118 .199 ROA 2.402 2 118 .095 ROE .863 2 118 .425 PAT 2.582 2 118 .080 Table no.15 - ANOVA Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F Sig. ROCEPercentage Between Groups 600.040 2 300.020 1.138 .324 Within Groups 31121.440 118 263.741 Total 31721.479 120 ROA Between Groups 4238.990 2 2119.495 1.131 .326 Within Groups 221128.753 118 1873.972 Total 225367.743 120 ROE Between Groups 977.676 2 488.838 1.156 .318 Within Groups 49901.193 118 422.891 Total 50878.869 120 PAT Between Groups 4.629E7 2 2.314E7 2.176 .118 Within Groups 1.255E9 118 1.064E7 Total 1.301E9 120 Table No.16 - Multiple Comparisons Tukey HSD Post hoc test Dependent (I) Organization (J) Organization Mean Difference Std. Error Sig. 95% Confidence Interval Variable Structure Category Structure Category (I-J) Lower Bound Upper Bound ROCEPercentage Diversified Concentrated -6.66098 4.69627 .335 -17.8083 4.4863 Block Holding -7.56100 5.42110 .347 -20.4288 5.3068 Concentrated Diversified 6.66098 4.69627 .335 -4.4863 17.8083 Block Holding -.90002 3.71026 .968 -9.7069 7.9068 Block Holding Diversified 7.56100 5.42110 .347 -5.3068 20.4288 Concentrated .90002 3.71026 .968 -7.9068 9.7069 ROA Diversified Concentrated -7.070392 1.251833E1 .839 -36.78455 22.64377 Block Holding -19.588336 1.445040E1 .368 -53.88857 14.71190 Concentrated Diversified 7.070392 1.251833E1 .839 -22.64377 36.78455 Block Holding -12.517943 9.890006 .417 -35.99338 10.95750 Block Holding Diversified 19.588336 1.445040E1 .368 -14.71190 53.88857 Concentrated 12.517943 9.890006 .417 -10.95750 35.99338 ROE Diversified Concentrated .837369 5.946743 .989 -13.27813 14.95287 Block Holding -6.275343 6.864561 .632 -22.56943 10.01874 Concentrated Diversified -.837369 5.946743 .989 -14.95287 13.27813 Block Holding -7.112712 4.698177 .288 -18.26455 4.03913 Block Holding Diversified 6.275343 6.864561 .632 -10.01874 22.56943 Concentrated 7.112712 4.698177 .288 -4.03913 18.26455 PAT Diversified Concentrated 668.63707 9.43094E2 .759 -1569.9402 2907.2144 Block Holding -865.61900 1.08865E3 .707 -3449.6975 1718.4595 Concentrated Diversified -668.63707 9.43094E2 .759 -2907.2144 1569.9402 Block Holding -1534.25607 7.45084E2 .103 -3302.8266 234.3144 Block Holding Diversified 865.61900 1.08865E3 .707 -1718.4595 3449.6975 Concentrated 1534.25607 7.45084E2 .103 -234.3144 3302.8266 www.theinternationaljournal.org > RJEBS: Volume: 02, Number: 06, April-2013 Page 101
Page 2 and 3:
Table of Contents Articles PERFORMA
Page 4 and 5:
servicing, and the policies not mee
Page 6 and 7:
The Self-Help Group members get inc
Page 8 and 9:
Are female workers more productive
Page 10 and 11:
For the purpose of including explan
Page 12 and 13:
several different, competing logist
Page 14 and 15:
Fisher, R.T. (2001), “Role stress
Page 16 and 17:
A Comparative Study of NPA of State
Page 18 and 19:
processes. Instead of fixing target
Page 20 and 21:
Agriculture Crisis and Sustainable
Page 22 and 23:
Table 1. World Cereal production ,
Page 24 and 25:
Expanding biofuel production The ex
Page 26 and 27:
percent of the world’s population
Page 28 and 29:
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-
Page 30 and 31:
It can provide the earnings needed
Page 32 and 33:
The incubator will also work toward
Page 34 and 35:
factor. This is not an easy proposi
Page 36 and 37:
ROLE OF LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT IN LE
Page 38 and 39:
During the last season red onion fa
Page 40 and 41:
Table Mch2 Coef. Std. Err Z P>/Z/ A
Page 42 and 43: lack of capital. The local farmer o
Page 44 and 45: It may be seen that alleviation of
Page 46 and 47: Table - 2 Progress under Bharat Nir
Page 48 and 49: References Chandrasekhar, B P., et
Page 50 and 51: existing cooperative legislation, r
Page 52 and 53: 1.3 THE RESEARCH QUESTIONS 1. What
Page 54 and 55: Table 2: Earnings and Cost Allocati
Page 56 and 57: have an adequate amount of capital
Page 58 and 59: programs and the union was doing on
Page 60 and 61: total assets to other key areas, it
Page 62 and 63: esponded by (7.6%) of the members.
Page 64 and 65: management; Gohe cooperatives savin
Page 66 and 67: Significance of asset quality of St
Page 68 and 69: iii) iv) Doubtful Assets:- a) Doubt
Page 70 and 71: atios and solvency ratios are taken
Page 72 and 73: Ratio of around 3% during 2007-08,
Page 74 and 75: sufficient to draw an inference in
Page 76 and 77: The observed R 2 and F statistics m
Page 78 and 79: Board Composition, Ownership Struct
Page 80 and 81: size as well. During our study it w
Page 82 and 83: standards prevailing in the country
Page 84 and 85: The procedure produces two tests of
Page 86 and 87: hoc test for pair wise comparisons
Page 88 and 89: e said that the board size affects
Page 90 and 91: high-tech small and medium-sized en
Page 94 and 95: Abstract Corporate Social Responsib
Page 96 and 97: the participation of various level
Page 98 and 99: Supplier Relations As stakeholders
Page 100 and 101: CSR initiatives of companies should
Page 102 and 103: Corporate Social Responsibility Pra
Page 104 and 105: 2011, this district received surplu
Page 106 and 107: In the case of marginal farmers and
Page 108 and 109: Findings From the above analysis it
Page 110 and 111: 2. Innovation: Meaning and Dimensio
Page 112 and 113: data appropriately. Inferences were
Page 114 and 115: The regression analyses as shown in
Page 116 and 117: Role of Self-help Group in Socio-ec
Page 118 and 119: 10% for women and men respectively
Page 120 and 121: MoRD has been constantly reviewing
Page 122 and 123: 76.6% units were found to be existi
Page 124 and 125: 10.Timely release of adequate loans
Page 126 and 127: Standard of living of Rural Fisher
Page 128 and 129: Table 1 denotes the infrastructure
Page 130 and 131: FISHING METHODS USED BY DIFFERENT A
Page 132 and 133: CONCLUSION Most of the fisher folk
Page 134 and 135: Objectives: The following objective
Page 136 and 137: Policies of the Government will hav
Page 138 and 139: Wastage Schedule (Onion) Sl.No. Pri
Page 140 and 141: At the end of 2008 the entire world
Page 142:
Conclusion: 9. The inflation can be
show all

Research Journal of Economics & Business Studies - RJEBS - The ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?