29.09.2015 Views

Engineering Geology

Engineering Geology - geomuseu

Engineering Geology - geomuseu

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

E n g i n e e r i n g G e o l o g y<br />

0.53 and 0.65 mm, respectively. Generally, larger pores were found in the Upper Chalk and in the<br />

southern area. In southern England the median pore diameter in the Lower Chalk was 0.22 mm,<br />

a feature attributed, in part, to a high marl content.<br />

The permeability of chalk is governed by its discontinuity pattern rather than by intergranular<br />

flow. As can be seen from the values given in Table 5.33, chalk has a high porosity but when<br />

the values are compared with intergranular permeability the relationship is poor. The values<br />

of primary permeability obtained by Bell et al. (1999) are more or less the same as those<br />

found by Ineson (1962). Ineson quoted a range between 0.1 ¥ 10 -10 and 25 ¥ 10 -9 m s -1 . The<br />

values provided by Bell et al. (1999) are shown in Table 5.33. The reason for the low primary<br />

permeability is the small size of the pores and, more particularly, that of the interconnecting<br />

throat areas. Price (1987) showed from mercury porosimeter testing that the median throat<br />

diameter typically was less than 1 mm, and that throat diameters are smaller in chalks from<br />

the north of England than in those from the south. Due to the operation of capillary and<br />

molecular forces, drainage of the “larger” pores (according to Price, their median diameters<br />

are approximately 5 mm) via such throats will not occur unless a suction on the order of 30 m<br />

head of water (approximately 300 kPa) is applied. Since gravitational drainage represents a<br />

suction of about 10 m, chalk has a very high specific retention.<br />

The unconfined compressive strength of chalk ranges from moderately weak (much of the<br />

Upper Chalk) to moderately strong (much of the Lower Chalk of Yorkshire and the Middle Chalk<br />

of Norfolk). However, the unconfined compressive strength of chalk undergoes a marked<br />

reduction when it is saturated (Bell et al., 1999). For instance, the Upper Chalk from Kent may<br />

suffer a loss on saturation amounting to approximately 70%. Chalk compresses elastically up<br />

to a critical pressure, the apparent preconsolidation pressure. Marked breakdown and<br />

substantial consolidation occurs at higher pressures. The coefficients of consolidation, c v ,<br />

and volume compressibility, m v , are around 1135 m 2 a -1 and 0.019 m 2 MN -1 , respectively.<br />

The Upper Chalk from Kent is particularly deformable, a typical value of Young’s modulus<br />

being 5 ¥ 10 3 MPa. In fact, it exhibits elastic–plastic deformation, with perhaps incipient<br />

creep prior to failure. The deformation properties of chalk in the field depend on its hardness,<br />

and the spacing, tightness and orientation of its discontinuities. The values of Young’s<br />

modulus also are influenced by the amount of weathering the chalk has undergone (Ward<br />

et al., 1968).<br />

Discontinuities are the fundamental factors governing the mass permeability of chalk. Chalk<br />

also is subject to dissolution along discontinuities. However, subterranean solution features<br />

generally tend not to develop in chalk since it is usually softer than limestone and, hence,<br />

so collapses as solution occurs. Nevertheless, solution pipes and swallow holes are present<br />

in chalk.<br />

270

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!