29.09.2015 Views

Engineering Geology

Engineering Geology - geomuseu

Engineering Geology - geomuseu

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 9<br />

The ease of drilling in rocks in which there are many discontinuities is influenced by their<br />

orientation in relation to the drillhole. Drilling over an open discontinuity means that part of the<br />

energy controlling drill penetration is lost. Where a drillhole crosses discontinuities at a low<br />

angle, this may cause the bit to stick. It also may lead to excessive wear and to the hole going<br />

off line. Drilling across the dip is generally less difficult than drilling with it. If the ground is<br />

badly broken, then the drillhole may require casing. Where discontinuities are filled with clay,<br />

this may penetrate the flush holes in the bit, causing it to bind or deviate from alignment.<br />

Spacing of the blastholes is determined on the one hand in relation to the strength, density<br />

and fracture pattern within the rock, and on the other in relation to the size of the charge.<br />

Careful trials are the only certain method of determining the correct burden and blasting<br />

pattern in any rock. As a rule, spacing varies between 0.75 and 1.25 times the burden.<br />

Generally, 1 kg of high explosive will bring down about 8–12 tonnes of rock. Good fragmentation<br />

reduces or eliminates the amount of secondary blasting while minimizing wear and tear<br />

on loading machinery.<br />

Rocks characterized by high specific gravity and high intergranular cohesion with no preferred<br />

orientation of mineral grains cause difficulties in blasting. They have high tensile<br />

strength and very low brittleness values, the high tensile strength resisting crack initiation and<br />

propagation upon blasting. Examples are provided by gabbros, breccias and greenstones.<br />

A second group that provides difficulties includes those rocks, such as certain granites,<br />

gneisses and marbles, which are relatively brittle with a low resistance to dynamic stresses.<br />

Blasting in such rocks gives rise to extensive pulverization immediately about the charged<br />

holes, leaving the area between almost unfractured. These rocks do not give an effective<br />

energy transfer from the detonated charge to the rock mass. The third category of rocks<br />

giving rise to difficult blasting is those possessing marked preferred orientation, mica schist<br />

being a typical example. The difficulty arises from the influence of the mechanical anistropy<br />

due to the preferred orientation of the flaky minerals. These rocks split easily along the<br />

lineation but crack propagation across it is limited.<br />

In many excavations, it is important to keep overbreak to a minimum. Apart from the cost of<br />

its replacement with concrete, damage to the rock forming the walls or floor may lower its<br />

strength and necessitate further excavation. What is more, smooth faces allow excavation<br />

closer to the payline and are more stable. There are two basic methods that can be used for<br />

this purpose, namely, line drilling and presplitting.<br />

Line drilling is the method most commonly used to improve the peripheral shaping of excavations.<br />

It consists of drilling alternate holes between the main blastholes forming the edge of the<br />

excavation. The quantity of explosive placed in each line hole is significantly smaller and<br />

indeed if these holes are closely spaced, from 150 to 250 mm, then explosive may be placed<br />

457

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!