29.09.2015 Views

Engineering Geology

Engineering Geology - geomuseu

Engineering Geology - geomuseu

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

E n g i n e e r i n g G e o l o g y<br />

at a particular time, whereas others provide an indication of the possibility of landslide occurrence<br />

(Fig. 8.8). The latter are landslide susceptibility maps and involve some estimation of<br />

relative risk (Van Westen et al., 2003).<br />

Effective landslide hazard management has done much to reduce economic and social losses<br />

due to slope failure by avoiding the hazards or by reducing the damage potential (Schuster,<br />

1992). This has been accomplished by prohibition, restrictions or regulations placed on development<br />

in landslide-prone areas; application of excavation grading, landscaping and construction<br />

codes; use of remedial measures to prevent or control slope failures; and landslide warning systems.<br />

These measures may be used in a variety of combinations to help solve both existing and<br />

potential landslide problems. They are generally applicable to flows, slides and falls. Recurrent<br />

damage from landslides can be avoided by permanently evacuating areas that continue to experience<br />

slope failures. Structures may be removed or converted to a use that is less vulnerable to<br />

landslide damage. Various types of land-use and land-development regulations can be used to<br />

reduce landslide hazards. They are often the most economical and most effective means available<br />

to a local government. Landslide-prone areas can be used as open spaces or the density<br />

of development can be kept to a minimum to reduce the potential for damage. Zoning and subdivision<br />

regulations, as well as moratoriums on rebuilding, can be used to meet these objectives.<br />

As the same preventative or corrective work cannot always be applied to different types of<br />

slides, it is important to identify the type of slide that is likely to take place or that has taken<br />

place. Also, it is important to bear in mind that landslides may change in character and that<br />

they are usually complex. When it comes to the correction of a landslide, as opposed to its<br />

prevention, since the limits and extent of the slide are generally well defined, the seriousness<br />

of the problem can be assessed. In such instances, consideration must be given to the stability<br />

of the area immediately adjoining the slide. Obviously, any corrective treatment must not<br />

adversely affect the stability of the area about the slide.<br />

If landslides are to be prevented, then areas of potential landsliding must be identified, as<br />

must their type and possible amount of movement. Then, if the hazard is sufficiently real, the<br />

engineer can devise a method of preventative treatment. Economic considerations, however,<br />

cannot be disregarded. In this respect, it is seldom economical to design cut slopes sufficiently<br />

flat to preclude the possibility of landslides.<br />

Landslide prevention may be brought about by reducing the activating forces, by increasing<br />

the forces resisting movement or by avoiding or eliminating the slide. Reduction of the<br />

activating forces can be accomplished by removing material from that part of the slide that<br />

provides the force that will give rise to movement. Complete excavation of potentially unstable<br />

material from a slope may be feasible; however, there is an upper limit to the amount of material<br />

that can be removed economically. Although partial removal is suitable for dealing with<br />

398

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!