29.09.2015 Views

Engineering Geology

Engineering Geology - geomuseu

Engineering Geology - geomuseu

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 9<br />

Table 9.5. Guide for the selection of primary support at shallow depth, size 5–15 m,<br />

construction by drilling and blasting (after Bieniawski, 1974). With kind permission of Balkema<br />

Alternative support systems<br />

Rock Mainly rock bolts (20 mm<br />

mass diameter, length half of<br />

class tunnel width, resin bonded) Mainly shotcrete Mainly steel ribs<br />

I Generally no support required<br />

II Rock bolts spaced 1.5–2 m, Shotcrete 50 mm Uneconomic<br />

plus occasional<br />

in crown.<br />

wire mesh<br />

III Rock bolts spaced 1.0–1.5 m Shotcrete 100 mm in Light sets spaced<br />

plus wire mesh crown and 50 mm on 1.5–2 m<br />

and 30 mm shotcrete in sides, plus occasional<br />

crown where required wire mesh and rock<br />

bolts where required<br />

IV Rock bolts spaced 0.5–1.0 m Shotcrete 150 mm in Medium sets spaced<br />

plus wire mesh crown and 100 mm on 0.7–1.5 m plus<br />

and 30–50 mm shotcrete sides plus wire mesh 50 mm shotcrete in<br />

in crown and sides and rock bolts, 3 m crown and sides.<br />

long and spaced 1.5 m<br />

V Not recommended Shotcrete 200 mm in Heavy sets spaced 0.7 m<br />

crown and 150 mm on with lagging. Shotcrete<br />

sides plus wire mesh, 80 mm thick to be<br />

rock bolts and light applied immediately<br />

steel sets. Seal face after blasting<br />

close invert<br />

primary or temporary support. Their purpose is to ensure tunnel stability until the secondary<br />

or permanent support system, for example, a concrete lining, is installed. The form of primary<br />

support depends on depth below the surface, tunnel size and shape, and method of excavation.<br />

Table 9.5 indicates the primary support measures for shallow tunnels 5–12 m in diameter driven<br />

by drilling and blasting.<br />

Barton et al. (1975) pointed out that Bieniawski (1974), in his analysis of tunnel support, more<br />

or less ignored the roughness of joints, the frictional strength of the joint fillings and the rock<br />

load. They, therefore, proposed the concept of rock mass quality, Q, which could be used as<br />

a means of rock classification for tunnel support (Table 9.6). They defined the rock mass<br />

quality in terms of six parameters:<br />

1. The RQD or an equivalent estimate of joint density.<br />

2. The number of joint sets, J n , which is an important indication of the degree of freedom<br />

of a rock mass. The RQD and the number of joint sets provide a crude measure of<br />

relative block size.<br />

489

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!