18.11.2015 Views

Conduits of Capital

1W5RpLB

1W5RpLB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Importance <strong>of</strong> Domestic Flows<br />

– Accessing domestic funds<br />

– Domestic investment opportunities<br />

The weighting <strong>of</strong> these different criteria will depend on the<br />

nature <strong>of</strong> the fund, <strong>of</strong> the potential investors in the fund, and<br />

the primary investment opportunities.<br />

Taxation<br />

Most funds operate in a competitive environment, and for<br />

them the returns paid to investors are crucial. Such funds<br />

seek as low as possible an effective tax rate. Given the<br />

competition from tax havens with zero tax rates, the effective<br />

tax rate needed to secure such footloose funds—i.e., those<br />

that have a wide choice <strong>of</strong> jurisdictions for registration—is<br />

close to zero.<br />

However, this depends partly on the domestic tax regime<br />

applicable to the investor. If the investor is subject to<br />

domestic taxation—which determines the final tax rate—<br />

then it is not necessary for the fund to have a low tax rate<br />

in its home jurisdiction; what is important is that any taxes<br />

that are paid can be <strong>of</strong>fset against the investor’s domestic<br />

tax liability. Hence a wide network <strong>of</strong> Double Taxation<br />

Agreements (DTAs) is essential.<br />

For financial centres dealing with mainly international flows<br />

(A-C in Figure 2 above), tax may be levied in the jurisdiction<br />

where the final investment takes place (C), and investors<br />

will be liable for taxation in their home jurisdiction (AC). If<br />

the FC imposes a significant additional layer <strong>of</strong> taxation,<br />

this is likely to be a disincentive for investment funds to be<br />

domiciled there.<br />

Regulatory Framework<br />

There is a common perception that fund managers seek<br />

jurisdictions with light regulation and that allow a high degree<br />

<strong>of</strong> secrecy regarding operations and beneficial ownership.<br />

This is not borne out by discussions with managers (although<br />

they might not admit it if this were their objective). What<br />

appears to be more important is a regulatory environment<br />

that is “reasonable,” and most importantly, transparent,<br />

predictable and consistent, with a regulator that is efficient<br />

(i.e., takes decisions and acts quickly).<br />

Also important is the knowledge and attitude <strong>of</strong> foreign<br />

regulators towards a particular jurisdiction. If a fund is intending<br />

to attract US investors, the attitude <strong>of</strong> the US regulator<br />

(SEC) and the investors themselves towards the jurisdiction<br />

is crucial.<br />

An important component <strong>of</strong> the regulatory framework,<br />

although not directly related to financial service operations,<br />

is the extent <strong>of</strong> exchange controls. Jurisdictions without<br />

exchange controls have a distinct advantage, and investors<br />

are generally reluctant to be exposed to the restrictions<br />

and delays involved in abiding with capital controls, where<br />

they exist.<br />

Support Services, Skills and Infrastructure<br />

Fund managers prefer to have access to a well-developed<br />

network <strong>of</strong> support services to deal with administrative and<br />

financial management tasks, as well as to manage interaction<br />

with the regulator. Access to skills is essential, and this can<br />

cover a wide range from basic administrative and financial<br />

management skills through to more sophisticated banking,<br />

asset management, investment, financial engineering and<br />

legal skills. Access to the more sophisticated skills may not<br />

be essential in the early stages <strong>of</strong> developing a financial<br />

centre, however, as it is likely that the operational aspects<br />

<strong>of</strong> a fund will be located elsewhere. To the extent that more<br />

sophisticated skills are needed and are not available locally<br />

in the financial centre, a liberal and efficient immigration<br />

system is essential to enable access to foreign skills.<br />

The availability <strong>of</strong> reasonable real estate (<strong>of</strong>fice and<br />

residential property), transport and communications are<br />

also essential.<br />

There are many “clustering” advantages in developing<br />

a financial centre, i.e., success tends to be reinforcing.<br />

The establishment <strong>of</strong> financial service operations in a FC<br />

stimulates the emergence <strong>of</strong> support services, which then<br />

tends to attract further financial services investment, in a<br />

virtuous circle. One <strong>of</strong> the main challenges in developing<br />

new FCs is achieving this critical mass. It may be easier<br />

in a larger economy that already has a developed financial<br />

sector servicing the domestic economy than in a smaller<br />

economy that has to do so from scratch.<br />

For funds that intend to undertake a stock market listing<br />

(which may be attractive to investors), a jurisdiction with a<br />

recognised and developed stock market is essential.<br />

72 |

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!