18.11.2015 Views

Conduits of Capital

1W5RpLB

1W5RpLB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The specialised services <strong>of</strong>fered by <strong>of</strong>fshore centres<br />

depend on a well-developed legal and regulatory<br />

environment, expertise (pr<strong>of</strong>essional, administrative and<br />

clerical); and, scale (i.e., returns from servicing a sizeable<br />

market). Onshoring such a service industry will require a<br />

huge effort and, even once successful, the specific services<br />

provided would serve only a narrow-base (predominantly<br />

accounting / taxation / legal / clerical services to the PE<br />

industry). Building trust in local capacity would be at best a<br />

medium-term endeavor. Altogether the development impact<br />

would take considerable time, require a concerted effort, be<br />

very costly to achieve, and be quite small.<br />

1.2 Onshoring Services Rather<br />

Than Centres<br />

The overwhelming challenges faced by countries wishing<br />

to onshore activities currently undertaken by <strong>of</strong>fshore<br />

centres taken together with the rather narrow nature <strong>of</strong><br />

the business being undertaken by these centres suggests<br />

that an alternative approach<br />

to onshoring might be<br />

more appropriate and<br />

contribute more significant<br />

development outcomes.<br />

The key challenge faced<br />

by investors in Africa is<br />

the lack <strong>of</strong> a pipeline <strong>of</strong><br />

viable, bankable projects,<br />

particularly in looking beyond<br />

the established cadre <strong>of</strong><br />

medium and large scale<br />

enterprises. Invariably<br />

investors are left chasing the<br />

rather small universe <strong>of</strong> more<br />

Source: EMPEA.<br />

well-established and larger<br />

companies. In the case <strong>of</strong> infrastructure, projects constraints<br />

may well relate to the legal / regulatory framework for<br />

undertaking private-public partnerships, whereas in the case<br />

<strong>of</strong> SMEs, investments are constrained by the SMEs’ limited<br />

capacity to develop bankable projects coupled with investor<br />

/ lender risk-aversion. The supply <strong>of</strong> early, risk-bearing<br />

finance for small enterprises in Africa is very scarce. Banks<br />

are notoriously cautious in providing loans to SMEs and due<br />

to the high-risk environment, the costs <strong>of</strong> bank borrowing<br />

are high. While subsistence entrepreneurs may initially rely<br />

on short-term funding provided by family and friends and to<br />

some extent by micr<strong>of</strong>inance institutions and Savings and<br />

Credit Cooperatives (SACCOs), it is recognised that there<br />

is a ‘missing middle,’ where bank funding is insufficient<br />

and risk capital is unavailable. 2 To support their expansion<br />

and innovation SMEs need risk-capital as well as good<br />

business advice.<br />

As illustrated in Figure 1, the market for private equity<br />

remains relatively small in Sub-Saharan Africa. In<br />

interpreting this data and the steady growth <strong>of</strong> PE fund<br />

investment commitments in recent years, see Figure 2,<br />

it should be emphasised that the PE industry in Africa is<br />

highly heterogeneous, and much PE investment targets<br />

larger, well-established, brand-name enterprises. Servicing<br />

larger enterprises is more lucrative, as it requires PE fund<br />

managers to invest less capacity in developing / assessing<br />

business proposals, preparing investment proposals (<strong>of</strong>ten<br />

entailing enterprise restructuring), and, once investments<br />

have been made, monitoring project performance. This<br />

partly reflects scale economies, but also quite severe<br />

capacity scarcity and<br />

resultant high costs. Thus,<br />

were PE funds to modify their<br />

business models, they could<br />

potentially provide a crucial<br />

source <strong>of</strong> risk-capital thereby<br />

increasing the boundaries <strong>of</strong><br />

available funding.<br />

From their active involvement<br />

in investee enterprises PE<br />

fund managers would also<br />

be an invaluable source<br />

<strong>of</strong> business advice, e.g.,<br />

in developing enterprise<br />

strategies, introducing<br />

utilisation <strong>of</strong> market<br />

intelligence, strengthening financial management <strong>of</strong><br />

investee enterprises, and supporting recruitment for key<br />

staff, etc. However, as <strong>of</strong> now the contribution <strong>of</strong> PE funds<br />

to SME development falls far short <strong>of</strong> potential.<br />

There can be little doubt about the high potential upside<br />

associated with onshoring <strong>of</strong> fund management and<br />

investment expertise. Local knowledge <strong>of</strong> potential<br />

borrowers, the risk pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> their businesses, their<br />

management skills, their liquidity and inventory cycles,<br />

etc. are indispensable to any third-party investor or lender.<br />

2<br />

See: Beck, Thorsten and Robert Cull, SME Finance in Africa, World Bank Research Working Paper #7018, 2014, and Berg, Gunhild and Michael<br />

Fuchs, Bank Financing <strong>of</strong> SMEs in Five Sub-Saharan African Countries: the role <strong>of</strong> Competition, Innovation and the Government, World Bank Policy<br />

Research Paper # 6563, 2013.<br />

86 |

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!