Blurred Borders - International Community Foundation
Blurred Borders - International Community Foundation
Blurred Borders - International Community Foundation
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
ICF Survey Project: “Why the Border Matters”<br />
Analysis of Survey Results #2<br />
March 9, 2004<br />
This is the final report from the results of the ICF “Why the Border Matters/<strong>Blurred</strong> <strong>Borders</strong>”<br />
project. Although results of most questions were provided earlier in our February 19 th Analysis<br />
#1 document, the following information provides results of a few additional questions, as well as<br />
additional details that can be used by ICF in the future.<br />
1. How long have you been living at that address?<br />
This question was preceded by the question, “What is the zip code or community in which you<br />
have your primary residence?” (which we used to developed the map in the methodology<br />
section of the Analysis #1 report).<br />
Table 2A: How long at current address<br />
Less than a<br />
year<br />
1-2 years 3-5 years more than 5 years<br />
SD-COMBINED (n=395) 6.1% 9.4% 10.4% 74.2%<br />
SD-ENGLISH (n=312) 5.4% 9.3% 10.6% 74.7%<br />
SD-SPANISH (n=83) 8.4% 9.6% 9.6% 72.3%<br />
General Location<br />
South San Diego 4.9% 8.5% 11.0% 75.6%<br />
Central San Diego 11.9% 16.4% 16.4% 55.2%<br />
North San Diego 5.0% 6.3% 7.5% 81.1%<br />
Tijuana (n=408) 7.60% 9.10% 18.90% 64.50%<br />
As can be seen, the above results also demonstrate the similar transitory nature of both San<br />
Diegans and Tijuanenses, as approximately 16% of the population on both sides of the border<br />
has been at their current address for two years or less. A majority of the citizens surveyed on<br />
both sides of the border have been at their current address for more than five years; although it is<br />
notable that Tijuana’s proportion of those that have been at their current address for 3-5 years is<br />
almost twice as large as that of San Diego’s.<br />
It is also important to note that because of a technical problem during the application of the<br />
survey using PDAs, this question was not asked to approximately 200 of the San Diegans.<br />
Although the results still have statistical significance, the “subregional” results are less accurate<br />
A-16