08.12.2012 Views

Global Change Abstracts The Swiss Contribution - SCNAT

Global Change Abstracts The Swiss Contribution - SCNAT

Global Change Abstracts The Swiss Contribution - SCNAT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

152 <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Change</strong> <strong>Abstracts</strong> – <strong>The</strong> <strong>Swiss</strong> <strong>Contribution</strong> | Coupled Systems and Cycles<br />

the interannual variability of the BSWB data set<br />

in the investigated regions, but the different models<br />

sometimes display considerable discrepancies<br />

in the seasonal evolution of TWS. In particular,<br />

we find that all models suffer from a considerable<br />

underestimation of interannual TWS variability.<br />

<strong>The</strong> deviations of the individual models from the<br />

BSWB data set can be linked to biases in the hydrological<br />

fluxes (i.e., precipitation, runoff, evapotranspiration).<br />

<strong>The</strong> simulated future changes for<br />

the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate <strong>Change</strong><br />

(IPCC) A2 scenario suggest an enhancement of the<br />

seasonal cycle of TWS, with drier soils in summer.<br />

Mainly in the Central European domain, several<br />

models show a reduction of the year-to-year variability<br />

of summer TWS variations, indicating an<br />

exhaustion of the models’ soil water reservoirs by<br />

the end of summer under future climatic conditions.<br />

Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres,<br />

2007, V112, ND22, NOV 30 ARTN: D22109.<br />

08.1-299<br />

Evaluation of AMIP II global climate model<br />

simulations of the land surface water budget<br />

and its components over the GEWEX-CEOP<br />

regions<br />

Irannejad P, Henderson Sellers A<br />

Iran, Australia, Switzerland<br />

Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences , Modelling ,<br />

Hydrology<br />

<strong>The</strong> land surface water balance components simulated<br />

by 20 atmospheric global circulation models<br />

(AGCMs) participating in phase II of the Atmospheric<br />

Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP II)<br />

are analyzed globally and over seven <strong>Global</strong> Energy<br />

and Water Cycle Experiment Coordinated<br />

Enhanced Observing Period basins. In contrast to<br />

the conclusions from analysis of AMIP I, the results<br />

presented here suggest that the group average<br />

of available AGCMs does not outperform all<br />

individual AGCMs in simulating the surface water<br />

balance components. Analysis shows that the<br />

available reanalysis products are not appropriate<br />

for evaluation of AGCMs’ simulated land surface<br />

water components. <strong>The</strong> worst simulation of the<br />

surface water budget is in the Murray-Darling, the<br />

most arid basin, where all the reanalyses and seven<br />

of the AGCMs produce a negative surface water<br />

budget, with evaporation alone exceeding precipitation<br />

and soil moisture decreasing over the<br />

whole AMIP II period in this basin. <strong>The</strong> spatiotemporal<br />

correlation coefficients between observed<br />

and AGCM- simulated runoff are smaller than<br />

those for precipitation. In almost all basins (except<br />

for the two most arid basins), the spatiotem-<br />

poral variations of the AGCMs’ simulated evaporation<br />

are more coherent and agree better with<br />

observations, compared to those of simulated precipitation.<br />

This suggests that differences among<br />

the AGCMs’ surface water budget predictions are<br />

not solely due to model- generated precipitation<br />

differences. Specifically, it is shown that different<br />

land surface parameterization schemes partition<br />

precipitation between evaporation and runoff differently<br />

and that this, in addition to the predicted<br />

differences in atmospheric forcings, is responsible<br />

for different predictions of basin-scale water budgets.<br />

<strong>The</strong> authors conclude that the selection of<br />

a land surface scheme for an atmospheric model<br />

has significant impacts on the predicted continental<br />

and basin-scale surface hydrology.<br />

Journal of Hydrometeorology, 2007, V8, N3, JUN,<br />

pp 304-326.<br />

08.1-300<br />

Comprehensive comparison of gap-filling techniques<br />

for eddy covariance net carbon fluxes<br />

Moffat A M, Papale D, Reichstein M, Hollinger D<br />

Y, Richardson A D, Barr A G, Beckstein C, Braswell<br />

B H, Churkina G, Desai A R, Falge E, Gove J H,<br />

Heimann M, Hui D, Jarvis A J, Kattge J, Noormets<br />

Asko, Stauch V J<br />

Germany, Italy, USA, Canada, England, Switzerland<br />

Modelling , Forestry , Plant Sciences , Agriculture,<br />

Soil Sciences<br />

We review 15 techniques for estimating missing<br />

values of net ecosystem CO 2 exchange (NEE) in<br />

eddy covariance time series and evaluate their<br />

performance for different artificial gap scenarios<br />

based on a set of 10 benchmark datasets from six<br />

forested sites in Europe. <strong>The</strong> goal of gap filling is<br />

the reproduction of the NEE time series and hence<br />

this present work focuses on estimating missing<br />

NEE values, not on editing or the removal of suspect<br />

values in these time series due to systematic<br />

errors in the measurements (e.g., nighttime flux,<br />

advection). <strong>The</strong> gap filling was examined by generating<br />

50 secondary datasets with artificial gaps<br />

(ranging in length from single half- hours to 12<br />

consecutive days) for each benchmark dataset and<br />

evaluating the performance with a variety of statistical<br />

metrics. <strong>The</strong> performance of the gap filling<br />

varied among sites and depended on the level of aggregation<br />

(native half-hourly time step versus daily),<br />

long gaps were more difficult to fill than short<br />

gaps, and differences among the techniques were<br />

more pronounced during the day than at night.<br />

<strong>The</strong> non-linear regression techniques (NLRs), the<br />

look-up table (LUT), marginal distribution sampling<br />

(MDS), and the semiparametric model (SPM)<br />

generally showed good overall performance. <strong>The</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!