Global Change Abstracts The Swiss Contribution - SCNAT
Global Change Abstracts The Swiss Contribution - SCNAT
Global Change Abstracts The Swiss Contribution - SCNAT
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
152 <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Change</strong> <strong>Abstracts</strong> – <strong>The</strong> <strong>Swiss</strong> <strong>Contribution</strong> | Coupled Systems and Cycles<br />
the interannual variability of the BSWB data set<br />
in the investigated regions, but the different models<br />
sometimes display considerable discrepancies<br />
in the seasonal evolution of TWS. In particular,<br />
we find that all models suffer from a considerable<br />
underestimation of interannual TWS variability.<br />
<strong>The</strong> deviations of the individual models from the<br />
BSWB data set can be linked to biases in the hydrological<br />
fluxes (i.e., precipitation, runoff, evapotranspiration).<br />
<strong>The</strong> simulated future changes for<br />
the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate <strong>Change</strong><br />
(IPCC) A2 scenario suggest an enhancement of the<br />
seasonal cycle of TWS, with drier soils in summer.<br />
Mainly in the Central European domain, several<br />
models show a reduction of the year-to-year variability<br />
of summer TWS variations, indicating an<br />
exhaustion of the models’ soil water reservoirs by<br />
the end of summer under future climatic conditions.<br />
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres,<br />
2007, V112, ND22, NOV 30 ARTN: D22109.<br />
08.1-299<br />
Evaluation of AMIP II global climate model<br />
simulations of the land surface water budget<br />
and its components over the GEWEX-CEOP<br />
regions<br />
Irannejad P, Henderson Sellers A<br />
Iran, Australia, Switzerland<br />
Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences , Modelling ,<br />
Hydrology<br />
<strong>The</strong> land surface water balance components simulated<br />
by 20 atmospheric global circulation models<br />
(AGCMs) participating in phase II of the Atmospheric<br />
Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP II)<br />
are analyzed globally and over seven <strong>Global</strong> Energy<br />
and Water Cycle Experiment Coordinated<br />
Enhanced Observing Period basins. In contrast to<br />
the conclusions from analysis of AMIP I, the results<br />
presented here suggest that the group average<br />
of available AGCMs does not outperform all<br />
individual AGCMs in simulating the surface water<br />
balance components. Analysis shows that the<br />
available reanalysis products are not appropriate<br />
for evaluation of AGCMs’ simulated land surface<br />
water components. <strong>The</strong> worst simulation of the<br />
surface water budget is in the Murray-Darling, the<br />
most arid basin, where all the reanalyses and seven<br />
of the AGCMs produce a negative surface water<br />
budget, with evaporation alone exceeding precipitation<br />
and soil moisture decreasing over the<br />
whole AMIP II period in this basin. <strong>The</strong> spatiotemporal<br />
correlation coefficients between observed<br />
and AGCM- simulated runoff are smaller than<br />
those for precipitation. In almost all basins (except<br />
for the two most arid basins), the spatiotem-<br />
poral variations of the AGCMs’ simulated evaporation<br />
are more coherent and agree better with<br />
observations, compared to those of simulated precipitation.<br />
This suggests that differences among<br />
the AGCMs’ surface water budget predictions are<br />
not solely due to model- generated precipitation<br />
differences. Specifically, it is shown that different<br />
land surface parameterization schemes partition<br />
precipitation between evaporation and runoff differently<br />
and that this, in addition to the predicted<br />
differences in atmospheric forcings, is responsible<br />
for different predictions of basin-scale water budgets.<br />
<strong>The</strong> authors conclude that the selection of<br />
a land surface scheme for an atmospheric model<br />
has significant impacts on the predicted continental<br />
and basin-scale surface hydrology.<br />
Journal of Hydrometeorology, 2007, V8, N3, JUN,<br />
pp 304-326.<br />
08.1-300<br />
Comprehensive comparison of gap-filling techniques<br />
for eddy covariance net carbon fluxes<br />
Moffat A M, Papale D, Reichstein M, Hollinger D<br />
Y, Richardson A D, Barr A G, Beckstein C, Braswell<br />
B H, Churkina G, Desai A R, Falge E, Gove J H,<br />
Heimann M, Hui D, Jarvis A J, Kattge J, Noormets<br />
Asko, Stauch V J<br />
Germany, Italy, USA, Canada, England, Switzerland<br />
Modelling , Forestry , Plant Sciences , Agriculture,<br />
Soil Sciences<br />
We review 15 techniques for estimating missing<br />
values of net ecosystem CO 2 exchange (NEE) in<br />
eddy covariance time series and evaluate their<br />
performance for different artificial gap scenarios<br />
based on a set of 10 benchmark datasets from six<br />
forested sites in Europe. <strong>The</strong> goal of gap filling is<br />
the reproduction of the NEE time series and hence<br />
this present work focuses on estimating missing<br />
NEE values, not on editing or the removal of suspect<br />
values in these time series due to systematic<br />
errors in the measurements (e.g., nighttime flux,<br />
advection). <strong>The</strong> gap filling was examined by generating<br />
50 secondary datasets with artificial gaps<br />
(ranging in length from single half- hours to 12<br />
consecutive days) for each benchmark dataset and<br />
evaluating the performance with a variety of statistical<br />
metrics. <strong>The</strong> performance of the gap filling<br />
varied among sites and depended on the level of aggregation<br />
(native half-hourly time step versus daily),<br />
long gaps were more difficult to fill than short<br />
gaps, and differences among the techniques were<br />
more pronounced during the day than at night.<br />
<strong>The</strong> non-linear regression techniques (NLRs), the<br />
look-up table (LUT), marginal distribution sampling<br />
(MDS), and the semiparametric model (SPM)<br />
generally showed good overall performance. <strong>The</strong>