Global Change Abstracts The Swiss Contribution - SCNAT
Global Change Abstracts The Swiss Contribution - SCNAT
Global Change Abstracts The Swiss Contribution - SCNAT
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Global</strong> <strong>Change</strong> <strong>Abstracts</strong> – <strong>The</strong> <strong>Swiss</strong> <strong>Contribution</strong> | Terrestrial Ecosystems 83<br />
fect on most techniques. No technique can rescue<br />
species that are difficult to predict. <strong>The</strong> predictive<br />
power of species-distribution models can partly<br />
be predicted from a series of species characteristics<br />
and traits based on growth rate, elevational<br />
distribution range, and maximum elevation.<br />
Slow-growing species or species with narrow and<br />
specialized niches tend to be better modeled. <strong>The</strong><br />
<strong>Swiss</strong> presence-only tree data produce models<br />
that are reliable enough to be useful in planning<br />
and management applications.<br />
Ecological Monographs, 2007, V77, N4, NOV, pp<br />
615-630.<br />
08.1-125<br />
Temporal changes in grazing intensity and<br />
herbage quality within a <strong>Swiss</strong> fen meadow<br />
Güsewell S, Pohl M, Gander A, Strehler C<br />
Switzerland<br />
Agriculture, Soil Sciences, Plant Sciences , Ecology ,<br />
Biodiversity<br />
Grazing is a possible tool for conservation management<br />
in wetlands, but a frequent problem is<br />
spatial variation in grazing intensity, which may<br />
promote the degradation of the vegetation. Temporal<br />
changes in grazing patterns may reduce<br />
this problem by leading to a more homogeneous<br />
overall use of the area. In a lakeshore wetland<br />
(2.8 ha) grazed by Scottish Highland cattle from<br />
May till September, we studied how the grazing<br />
of nine vegetation types changes seasonally and<br />
between years, and how this is related to the<br />
quantity and quality of the herbage. We observed<br />
cattle activity weekly throughout two grazing<br />
periods, determined the biomass and nutrient<br />
concentrations of the vegetation, analysed dung<br />
samples, and carried out clipping experiments to<br />
assess shoot regeneration after grazing. <strong>The</strong> annual<br />
grazing intensity varied seven-fold among<br />
vegetation types, and this pattern was closely<br />
similar in both years. In several vegetation types,<br />
however, grazing intensity changed seasonally.<br />
Cattle first grazed tall grass-dominated vegetation<br />
(Phragmition, Phalaridion), which had the<br />
most digestible and nutrient-rich herbage, but<br />
the poor regeneration of dominant species forced<br />
the cattle to then graze small-sedge dominated,<br />
nutrient-poor fen vegetation (Caricion davallianae).<br />
<strong>The</strong>se temporal changes in grazing patterns<br />
slightly reduced the spatial variation in grazing<br />
intensity. To take advantage of this effect,<br />
relatively long grazing seasons are preferable to<br />
shorter ones. Four years of grazing reduced the<br />
above- ground biomass production and nutrient<br />
concentrations of several vegetation types.<br />
<strong>The</strong>refore, years without grazing may be needed<br />
to prevent a degradation of palatable plant communities<br />
with low grazing tolerance.<br />
Botanica Helvetica, 2007, V117, N1, JUN, pp<br />
57-73.<br />
08.1-126<br />
Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: reconciling<br />
the results of experimental and observational<br />
studies<br />
Hector A, Joshi J, Scherer Lorenzen M, Schmid B,<br />
Spehn E M, Wacker L, Weilenmann M, Bazeley<br />
White E, Beierkuhnlein C, Caldeira M C, Dimitrakopoulos<br />
P G, Finn J A, Huss Danell K, Jumpponen A,<br />
Leadley P W, Loreau M, Mulder C P H, Nesshoever<br />
C, Palmborg C, Read D J, Siamantziouras A S D,<br />
Terry A C, Troumbis A Y<br />
Switzerland, Germany, England, Portugal, Greece,<br />
Ireland, Sweden, France, Canada<br />
Biodiversity , Ecology , Plant Sciences<br />
Functional Ecology, 2007, V21, N5, OCT, pp<br />
998-1002.<br />
08.1-127<br />
<strong>The</strong> generality of habitat suitability models: A<br />
practical test with two insect groups<br />
Hein S, Binzenhöfer B, Poethke H J, Biedermann R,<br />
Settele J, Schroeder B<br />
Switzerland, Germany<br />
Biodiversity , Ecology , Modelling , Zoology<br />
For the design and declaration of conservation areas<br />
as well as for planning habitat management<br />
it is important to quantitatively know the habitat<br />
preferences of the focal species. To take into account<br />
the requirements of as many species as possible,<br />
it would be of great advantage if one would<br />
either (i) find one or several species whose habitat<br />
requirements cover those of a large number of<br />
other species or if one could (ii) identify a common<br />
set of habitat parameters that is important<br />
for the occurrence of many species. Ideally such<br />
common habitat parameters should be easy to<br />
measure. Only then they may be of practical value<br />
in applied conservation biology. In this study, we<br />
compared the habitat preferences of different insect<br />
species (grasshoppers, bush crickets, butterflies,<br />
moths) in the same region by applying identical<br />
methods. To identify common explanatory<br />
variables that predict the occurrence probability<br />
of these species, we first tested the transferability<br />
of the specific ‘species models’ to other species<br />
within the same insect group. We tested how well<br />
the incidence of one species can be predicted by<br />
the occurrence probability of another species. <strong>The</strong><br />
‘best’ models within each group were then tested<br />
for transferability between the different groups.<br />
Additionally, we tested the predictive power of the