Global Change Abstracts The Swiss Contribution - SCNAT
Global Change Abstracts The Swiss Contribution - SCNAT
Global Change Abstracts The Swiss Contribution - SCNAT
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
192 <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Change</strong> <strong>Abstracts</strong> – <strong>The</strong> <strong>Swiss</strong> <strong>Contribution</strong> | Human Dimensions<br />
respondents to a survey conducted in the city of<br />
Nairobi, Kenya. Factor analysis, used to condense<br />
these interrelated problems into a few dimensions,<br />
identified two overriding threats: the first being to<br />
socioeconomic security, and the second to the physical<br />
environment. Threats to socioeconomic security<br />
explained 76.6% of the variance in the rating of environmental<br />
and socioeconomic problems facing Nairobi,<br />
with very high factor loadings from corruption,<br />
unemployment, crime, street children, garbage,<br />
transport, poverty, pollution of Nairobi River, HIV/<br />
AIDS and immorality/promiscuity. Threats to the<br />
physical and living environment explained 22.2% of<br />
the variance in the rating of environmental and socioeconomic<br />
problems facing Nairobi. We were led<br />
to conclude that the respondents did not perceive<br />
climate change as being a significant problem in<br />
Nairobi. <strong>The</strong> global concern about climate change<br />
appeared like a mere drop in the oceanic context<br />
pervaded by problems of poverty, unemployment,<br />
crime and corruption, etc. which Nairobi faces, as<br />
does Kenya as a whole. Our conclusion is partially reflected<br />
in the priorities of the Kenyan government,<br />
which focus on poverty alleviation, the fight against<br />
crime and graft, improved access to education, and<br />
on addressing health problems; it also poses a challenge<br />
to the climate change community to find ways<br />
to making interventions relevant to local socioeconomic<br />
reality facing a developing country city like<br />
Nairobi. <strong>The</strong>re may be a need to reconsider ‘whose<br />
reality counts’ (borrowing from Robert Chambers,<br />
Whose reality counts? Putting the first last, Intermediate<br />
Technology Publications, London, p 122, 1997)<br />
in addressing climate change: should protracted<br />
Kyoto protocol negotiations be given priority or<br />
should a long lasting solution be sought to socioeconomic<br />
problems facing developing world cities such<br />
as Nairobi? We recommend that the ongoing efforts<br />
at integrating climate risk management, as components<br />
of climate-sensitive sustainable development,<br />
be studied in many settings, with a focus on the<br />
developing world which is the most vulnerable, in<br />
order to inform decision-making and development<br />
of intervention measures.<br />
Climatic <strong>Change</strong>, 2007, V85, N3-4, DEC,<br />
pp 271-284.<br />
08.1-406<br />
<strong>The</strong> future of the <strong>Swiss</strong> Alps: A participatory<br />
sustainability assessment of agricultural and<br />
landscape scenarios<br />
Soliva R<br />
Switzerland<br />
Agriculture, Soil Sciences , Social Sciences , Ecology<br />
In the <strong>Swiss</strong> Alps, as in other European Alpine<br />
regions, agricultural decline is leading to land<br />
abandonment and natural reforestation, which<br />
may have wider implications for a sustainable<br />
development of these areas. A sustainability assessment<br />
of three scenarios involving discussions<br />
with a local stakeholder group was performed<br />
as part of a case study in the <strong>Swiss</strong> canton of<br />
Grisons. <strong>The</strong> first scenario, called “liberalisation”,<br />
assumed withdrawal of all agricultural support.<br />
A second scenario, called “biodiversity”, assumed<br />
full replacement of agricultural support by biodiversity<br />
payments. <strong>The</strong>se two scenarios were compared<br />
with a “trend” scenario, i.e., continuation<br />
of current trends. <strong>The</strong> liberalisation scenario was<br />
found to have the most negative consequences<br />
on livelihoods as well as social and environmental<br />
aspects, and it was completely rejected by the<br />
local stakeholder group. <strong>The</strong> trend scenario was<br />
best received, although it does not substantially<br />
contribute to sustainable development. <strong>The</strong> biodiversity<br />
scenario was the most controversial<br />
scenario, with positive environmental outcomes<br />
but negative cultural and social consequences.<br />
Using scenarios in a participatory sustainability<br />
assessment was found helpful both as a research<br />
technique and for stimulating a debate about the<br />
future of European mountain areas.<br />
Gaia Ecological Perspectives For Science and Society,<br />
2007, V16, N2, pp 122-129.<br />
08.1-407<br />
Output and abatement effects of allocation<br />
readjustment in permit trade<br />
Sterner T, Müller A<br />
Sweden, USA, Switzerland<br />
Economics , Political Sciences , International Relations<br />
In permit trading systems, free initial allocation<br />
is common practice. A recent example is the European<br />
Union Greenhouse Gas Emission Trading<br />
Scheme (EU-ETS). We investigate effects of different<br />
free allocation schemes on incentives and<br />
identify significant perverse effects on abatement<br />
and output employing a simple multi- period<br />
model. Firms have incentives for strategic action<br />
if allocation in one period depends on their actions<br />
in previous ones and thus can be influenced<br />
by them. <strong>The</strong>se findings play a major role where<br />
trading schemes become increasingly popular<br />
as environmental or resource use policy instruments.<br />
This is of particular relevance in the EU-<br />
ETS where the current period is a trial-period<br />
before the first commitment period of the Kyoto<br />
protocol. Finally, this paper fills a gap in the literature<br />
by establishing a consistent terminology for<br />
initial allocation.<br />
Climatic <strong>Change</strong>, 2008, V86, N1-2, JAN, pp 33-49.