08.12.2012 Views

Global Change Abstracts The Swiss Contribution - SCNAT

Global Change Abstracts The Swiss Contribution - SCNAT

Global Change Abstracts The Swiss Contribution - SCNAT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

192 <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Change</strong> <strong>Abstracts</strong> – <strong>The</strong> <strong>Swiss</strong> <strong>Contribution</strong> | Human Dimensions<br />

respondents to a survey conducted in the city of<br />

Nairobi, Kenya. Factor analysis, used to condense<br />

these interrelated problems into a few dimensions,<br />

identified two overriding threats: the first being to<br />

socioeconomic security, and the second to the physical<br />

environment. Threats to socioeconomic security<br />

explained 76.6% of the variance in the rating of environmental<br />

and socioeconomic problems facing Nairobi,<br />

with very high factor loadings from corruption,<br />

unemployment, crime, street children, garbage,<br />

transport, poverty, pollution of Nairobi River, HIV/<br />

AIDS and immorality/promiscuity. Threats to the<br />

physical and living environment explained 22.2% of<br />

the variance in the rating of environmental and socioeconomic<br />

problems facing Nairobi. We were led<br />

to conclude that the respondents did not perceive<br />

climate change as being a significant problem in<br />

Nairobi. <strong>The</strong> global concern about climate change<br />

appeared like a mere drop in the oceanic context<br />

pervaded by problems of poverty, unemployment,<br />

crime and corruption, etc. which Nairobi faces, as<br />

does Kenya as a whole. Our conclusion is partially reflected<br />

in the priorities of the Kenyan government,<br />

which focus on poverty alleviation, the fight against<br />

crime and graft, improved access to education, and<br />

on addressing health problems; it also poses a challenge<br />

to the climate change community to find ways<br />

to making interventions relevant to local socioeconomic<br />

reality facing a developing country city like<br />

Nairobi. <strong>The</strong>re may be a need to reconsider ‘whose<br />

reality counts’ (borrowing from Robert Chambers,<br />

Whose reality counts? Putting the first last, Intermediate<br />

Technology Publications, London, p 122, 1997)<br />

in addressing climate change: should protracted<br />

Kyoto protocol negotiations be given priority or<br />

should a long lasting solution be sought to socioeconomic<br />

problems facing developing world cities such<br />

as Nairobi? We recommend that the ongoing efforts<br />

at integrating climate risk management, as components<br />

of climate-sensitive sustainable development,<br />

be studied in many settings, with a focus on the<br />

developing world which is the most vulnerable, in<br />

order to inform decision-making and development<br />

of intervention measures.<br />

Climatic <strong>Change</strong>, 2007, V85, N3-4, DEC,<br />

pp 271-284.<br />

08.1-406<br />

<strong>The</strong> future of the <strong>Swiss</strong> Alps: A participatory<br />

sustainability assessment of agricultural and<br />

landscape scenarios<br />

Soliva R<br />

Switzerland<br />

Agriculture, Soil Sciences , Social Sciences , Ecology<br />

In the <strong>Swiss</strong> Alps, as in other European Alpine<br />

regions, agricultural decline is leading to land<br />

abandonment and natural reforestation, which<br />

may have wider implications for a sustainable<br />

development of these areas. A sustainability assessment<br />

of three scenarios involving discussions<br />

with a local stakeholder group was performed<br />

as part of a case study in the <strong>Swiss</strong> canton of<br />

Grisons. <strong>The</strong> first scenario, called “liberalisation”,<br />

assumed withdrawal of all agricultural support.<br />

A second scenario, called “biodiversity”, assumed<br />

full replacement of agricultural support by biodiversity<br />

payments. <strong>The</strong>se two scenarios were compared<br />

with a “trend” scenario, i.e., continuation<br />

of current trends. <strong>The</strong> liberalisation scenario was<br />

found to have the most negative consequences<br />

on livelihoods as well as social and environmental<br />

aspects, and it was completely rejected by the<br />

local stakeholder group. <strong>The</strong> trend scenario was<br />

best received, although it does not substantially<br />

contribute to sustainable development. <strong>The</strong> biodiversity<br />

scenario was the most controversial<br />

scenario, with positive environmental outcomes<br />

but negative cultural and social consequences.<br />

Using scenarios in a participatory sustainability<br />

assessment was found helpful both as a research<br />

technique and for stimulating a debate about the<br />

future of European mountain areas.<br />

Gaia Ecological Perspectives For Science and Society,<br />

2007, V16, N2, pp 122-129.<br />

08.1-407<br />

Output and abatement effects of allocation<br />

readjustment in permit trade<br />

Sterner T, Müller A<br />

Sweden, USA, Switzerland<br />

Economics , Political Sciences , International Relations<br />

In permit trading systems, free initial allocation<br />

is common practice. A recent example is the European<br />

Union Greenhouse Gas Emission Trading<br />

Scheme (EU-ETS). We investigate effects of different<br />

free allocation schemes on incentives and<br />

identify significant perverse effects on abatement<br />

and output employing a simple multi- period<br />

model. Firms have incentives for strategic action<br />

if allocation in one period depends on their actions<br />

in previous ones and thus can be influenced<br />

by them. <strong>The</strong>se findings play a major role where<br />

trading schemes become increasingly popular<br />

as environmental or resource use policy instruments.<br />

This is of particular relevance in the EU-<br />

ETS where the current period is a trial-period<br />

before the first commitment period of the Kyoto<br />

protocol. Finally, this paper fills a gap in the literature<br />

by establishing a consistent terminology for<br />

initial allocation.<br />

Climatic <strong>Change</strong>, 2008, V86, N1-2, JAN, pp 33-49.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!