Global Change Abstracts The Swiss Contribution - SCNAT
Global Change Abstracts The Swiss Contribution - SCNAT
Global Change Abstracts The Swiss Contribution - SCNAT
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Global</strong> <strong>Change</strong> <strong>Abstracts</strong> – <strong>The</strong> <strong>Swiss</strong> <strong>Contribution</strong> | Terrestrial Ecosystems 95<br />
08.1-153<br />
Are the living collections of the world’s<br />
botanical gardens following species-richness<br />
patterns observed in natural ecosystems?<br />
Pautasso M, Parmentier I<br />
England, Switzerland, Belgium<br />
Biodiversity , Plant Sciences , Ecology , Urban<br />
Studies<br />
Botanical gardens aim to promote the awareness,<br />
study and conservation of plant species diversity,<br />
but little is known about the species diversity of<br />
botanical gardens themselves. We therefore investigated<br />
whether the species richness of the<br />
world’s botanical gardens is related to their size,<br />
age and geographical location by compiling data<br />
from gardens in 124 different countries. <strong>The</strong> data<br />
show that even in these highly managed ecosystems,<br />
species richness can be described in terms of<br />
a relatively small number of large-scale patterns.<br />
As with most natural ecosystems, there were positive<br />
species-area and species-age relationships.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re was also a positive latitudinal gradient in<br />
species richness, which contrasts with the trend<br />
observed in natural ecosystems. This discrepancy<br />
may be due to the use of heated greenhouses at<br />
high latitudes, the rarity of old botanical gardens<br />
in the tropics, and the problem of poverty in developing<br />
countries, where most hotspots of plant<br />
biodiversity are located. <strong>The</strong>re is thus a need to allocate<br />
more funds to botanical gardens in speciesrich<br />
regions. This study also calls for an increase<br />
in the coordination of data management between<br />
botanical gardens.<br />
Botanica Helvetica, 2007, V117, N1, JUN, pp<br />
15-28.<br />
08.1-154<br />
Common species determine richness patterns<br />
in biodiversity indicator taxa<br />
Pearman P B, Weber D<br />
Switzerland<br />
Biodiversity , Ecology , Zoology , Plant Sciences<br />
Identification of spatial patterns of species diversity<br />
is a central problem in conservation biology,<br />
with the patterns having implications for<br />
the design of biodiversity monitoring programs.<br />
Nonetheless, there are few field data with which<br />
to examine whether variation in species richness<br />
represents consistent correlations among taxa in<br />
the richness of rare or common species, or the<br />
relative importance of common and rare species<br />
in establishing trends in species richness within<br />
taxa. We used field data on three higher taxa<br />
(birds, butterflies, vascular plants) to examine the<br />
correlation of species richness among taxa and<br />
the contribution of rare and common species to<br />
these correlations. We used graphical analysis to<br />
compare the contributions to spatial variation in<br />
species richness by widely- distributed (‘common’)<br />
and sparsely- distributed (‘rare’) species. <strong>The</strong> data<br />
came from the <strong>Swiss</strong> Biodiversity Monitoring Program,<br />
which is national in scope and based on a<br />
randomly located, regular sampling grid of 1 kM2<br />
cells, a scale relevant to real-world monitoring<br />
and managerrient. We found that the correlation<br />
of species richness between groups of rare and<br />
common species varies among higher taxa, with<br />
butterflies exhibiting the highest levels of correlation.<br />
Species richness of common species is consistently<br />
positively correlated among these three<br />
taxa, but in no case exceeded 0.69. Spatial patterns<br />
of species richness are determined mainly<br />
by common species, in agreement with coarse resolution<br />
studies, but the contribution of rare species<br />
to variation in species richness varies within<br />
the study area in accordance with elevation. our<br />
analyses suggest that spatial patterns in species<br />
richness can be described by sampling widely distributed<br />
species alone. Butterflies differ from the<br />
other two taxa in that the richness of red-listed<br />
species and other rare species is correlated with<br />
overall butterfly species richness. Monitoring of<br />
butterfly species richness may provide information<br />
on rare butterflies and on species richness of<br />
other taxa as well.<br />
Biological Conservation, 2007, V138, N1-2, AUG,<br />
pp 109-119.<br />
08.1-155<br />
Earthworm populations in two low-input<br />
cereal farming systems<br />
Pfiffner L, Luka H<br />
Switzerland<br />
Agriculture, Soil Sciences , Ecology<br />
Earthworm populations in low-input integrated<br />
crop management (ICM: no application of insecticides,<br />
fungicides and growth regulators) and organic<br />
farming systems were compared. <strong>The</strong> study<br />
was performed as a 3-year field survey using a<br />
paired-farm approach in six different locations in<br />
northwestern Switzerland. Earthworms were extracted<br />
from soils sampled from 24 winter cereal<br />
fields using a combined method of extraction by<br />
mustard flour solution and handsorting. Earthworm<br />
communities differed between these farming<br />
systems. Over all sites, the mean biomass, abundance<br />
and species richness of earthworms found<br />
in the low-input ICM fields were significantly lower<br />
than in the organic fields. Adult earthworms<br />
in organic fields were 114% more abundant than<br />
in ICM fields, but the frequencies of most species<br />
within the respective systems were similar in both