07.11.2016 Views

OT2015Journal

OT2015Journal

OT2015Journal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MONDAY, OCTOBER 5, 2015<br />

127<br />

matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a)<br />

is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin<br />

v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per<br />

curiam).<br />

No. 14–9886. Derrick Allen, Petitioner v. Florida Department of<br />

Corrections. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis<br />

denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court<br />

of Appeal of Florida, First District, dismissed. See Rule 39.8.<br />

No. 14–9914. Ernest Paul Cassidy, III, Petitioner v. Clark E. Ducart,<br />

Warden. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of<br />

Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied. Justice Breyer took no part in<br />

the consideration or decision of this petition.<br />

No. 14–10064. Frederick Karl Jost, Petitioner v. California. Motion<br />

of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition<br />

for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for<br />

the Ninth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.<br />

No. 14–10084. Willie Asbury, Petitioner v. South Carolina, et al.<br />

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and<br />

petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of South Carolina<br />

dismissed. See Rule 39.8.<br />

No. 14–10087. David W. Creveling, Petitioner v. Donna M. Alma,<br />

et vir, et al. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis<br />

denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of<br />

Washington, Division 3, dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has<br />

repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to<br />

accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner<br />

unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition<br />

submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia<br />

Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).<br />

No. 14–10111. Tyrone Alan Ganoe, Petitioner v. United States. Petition<br />

for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the<br />

Ninth Circuit denied. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration<br />

or decision of this petition.<br />

No. 14–10125. Joseph Macastle Jackson, Petitioner v. Tracy McCollum,<br />

Warden. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis<br />

denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States<br />

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As<br />

petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed<br />

not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from<br />

petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!