OT2015Journal

MONDAY, JANUARY 25, 2016
473
No. 15–421. Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc., Petitioner v. Greg Adkisson,
et al. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court
of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied. Justice Alito took no part in
the consideration or decision of this petition.
No. 15–659. ACT, Inc., Petitioner v. Bais Yaakov of Spring Valley.
Motion of Anthony Michael Sabino for leave to file a brief as amicus
curiae granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
No. 15–667. Timothy White, et al., Petitioners v. Regents of the
University of California, et al. Motion of The American Association of
Physical Anthropologists, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae
granted. Motion of The Ohio Archaeological Council, et al. for leave to
file a brief as amici curiae granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to
the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 15–7023. Jeffrey R. LeBlanc, Petitioner v. Kenneth Romanowski,
Warden. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis
denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari dismissed. See
Rule 39.8.
No. 15–7024. Jeffrey R. LeBlanc, Petitioner v. Kenneth Romanowski,
Warden. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis
denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari dismissed. See
Rule 39.8.
No. 15–7044. Jeffrey R. LeBlanc, Petitioner v. Michigan State Police.
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied,
and the petition for a writ of certiorari dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
No. 15–7103. Richard Kearney, Petitioner v. Harold Graham, Superintendent,
Auburn Correctional Facility. Motion of petitioner for leave
to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for a writ of certiorari
dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this
Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions
in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee
required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance
with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals,
506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Sotomayor took no part in the
consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.
No. 15–7199. Lori Rappaport LaCroix, Petitioner v. United States
District Court for the Western District of Kentucky, et al. Motion of
petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition
for a writ of certiorari dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has
repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to