OT2015Journal

934 MONDAY, JUNE 27, 2016
No. 15–1014. Click-To-Call Technologies, LP, Petitioner v. Oracle
Corporation, et al. On petition for writ of certiorari to the United
States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Petition for writ of
certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit for further
consideration in light of Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. Lee, 579
U. S. ––– (2016). Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision
of this petition.
Orders in Pending Cases
No. 15M134. Alberto Romero Lopez, Petitioner v. Joseph McFadden,
Warden. Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for a writ of certiorari
out of time denied.
No. 15M135. Katherine B. Robinson, Petitioner v. Drug Enforcement
Administration, et al. Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition
for a writ of certiorari out of time denied.
No. 15–8680. Ronald I. Paul, Petitioner v. Paul D. de Holczer, et al.
Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed
in forma pauperis denied.
No. 15–9006. In Re Paul Benjamin Goist, Petitioner. Motion of petitioner
for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma
pauperis denied.
No. 15–9042. Patricia Anderson, Petitioner v. Harrison County, Mississippi.
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis
denied. Petitioner allowed until July 18, 2016, within which to pay the
docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance
with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
No. 15–9472. George Dimitrios Skrettas, Petitioner v. Department
of Veterans Affairs. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma
pauperis denied. Petitioner allowed until July 18, 2016, within which
to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition
in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Appeal—Jurisdiction Noted
No. 15–1262. Patrick McCrory, Governor of North Carolina, et al.,
Appellants v. David Harris, et al. Appeal from the United States District
Court for the Middle District of North Carolina. In this case probable
jurisdiction is noted.